mirror of
https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/OpenSubdiv
synced 2024-11-09 13:50:05 +00:00
Merge pull request #886 from davidgyu/release_docs1
Removed roadmap page from the documentation.
This commit is contained in:
commit
3f30b34de2
@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ if (DOCUTILS_FOUND AND PYTHONINTERP_FOUND)
|
||||
references.rst
|
||||
release_notes.rst
|
||||
release_notes_2x.rst
|
||||
roadmap.rst
|
||||
sdc_overview.rst
|
||||
subdivision_surfaces.rst
|
||||
tutorials.rst
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
|
||||
<li><a href="contributing.html">Contributing</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="cmake_build.html">Building OpenSubdiv</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="code_examples.html">Code Examples</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="roadmap.html">Roadmap</a></li>
|
||||
<li><a href="references.html">References</a></li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
<p></p>
|
||||
|
@ -1,156 +0,0 @@
|
||||
..
|
||||
Copyright 2013 Pixar
|
||||
|
||||
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "Apache License")
|
||||
with the following modification; you may not use this file except in
|
||||
compliance with the Apache License and the following modification to it:
|
||||
Section 6. Trademarks. is deleted and replaced with:
|
||||
|
||||
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
|
||||
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor
|
||||
and its affiliates, except as required to comply with Section 4(c) of
|
||||
the License and to reproduce the content of the NOTICE file.
|
||||
|
||||
You may obtain a copy of the Apache License at
|
||||
|
||||
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
||||
|
||||
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
||||
distributed under the Apache License with the above modification is
|
||||
distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
|
||||
KIND, either express or implied. See the Apache License for the specific
|
||||
language governing permissions and limitations under the Apache License.
|
||||
|
||||
Roadmap
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
.. contents::
|
||||
:local:
|
||||
:backlinks: none
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
3.x Release Cycle
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
For more details, please see the `Release Notes <release_notes.html>`_.
|
||||
|
||||
3.0 Master Release (Q2 2015)
|
||||
|
||||
* freeze subdivision 'specification' (enforce backward compatibility)
|
||||
|
||||
3.1 Supplemental Release (Q3/Q4 2015)
|
||||
|
||||
* include any noteworthy omissions arising from 3.0
|
||||
* add support for bi-cubic face-varying limit patches
|
||||
* add support for higher order differentiation of limit patches
|
||||
|
||||
3.2 Future Release (2016)
|
||||
|
||||
* TBD
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Near Term
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
The following is a short list of topics already expressed as priorities and
|
||||
receiving ongoing attention -- some being actively prototyped to varying
|
||||
degrees.
|
||||
|
||||
Feature parity for Loop subdivision
|
||||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
The more popular Catmark scheme has long received more attention and effort
|
||||
than the Loop scheme. Given OpenSubdiv claims to support both, additional
|
||||
effort is required to bring Loop to the same level of functionality as
|
||||
Catmark. With the feature-adaptive analysis now scheme-independent, the
|
||||
addition of triangular patches to the PatchTables will go a long way towards
|
||||
that goal. Prototype patch gathering and evaluation methods have already
|
||||
been tested within the existing code base and discussions on extending the
|
||||
internal patch infra-structure are underway.
|
||||
|
||||
Improved support for infinitely sharp features
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
The current implementation of adaptive feature isolation requires infinitely
|
||||
sharp creases to be pushed to the highest level of isolation -- eventually
|
||||
representing the result with a regular patch. The surface is therefore both
|
||||
inefficient and incorrect. Patches with a single infinitely sharp edge can be
|
||||
represented exactly with regular boundary patches and could be isolated at a
|
||||
much higher level. Continuity with dart patches is necessary in such cases,
|
||||
and approximating more sharp irregular regions with alternate patch types
|
||||
(e.g. Gregory or Bezier) will help this goal and others.
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic feature adaptive isolation (DFAS)
|
||||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Adaptive feature isolation can produce a large number of patches, especially
|
||||
when the model contains a lot of semi-sharp creases. We need a LOD solution
|
||||
that can dynamically isolate features based on distance to view-point. (Note:
|
||||
paper from Matthias Niessner & Henry Schafer)
|
||||
|
||||
Longer Term
|
||||
===========
|
||||
|
||||
The following is a list of pending projects and future directions for
|
||||
OpenSubdiv.
|
||||
|
||||
Implement a "high-level" API layer
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
One of the original goals of the OpenSubdiv project is to provide a robust
|
||||
and simple API to display subdivision surfaces interactively. Now that the
|
||||
algorithms and code-base have matured, we would like to foster a consistent
|
||||
implementation of subdivision surfaces suitable for adoption in the lower
|
||||
layers of the graphics stack, such as GPU drivers. We have been working on
|
||||
the draft of a "specification document" detailing the workings of a high-
|
||||
level interface for subdivision surface data and functionality. We need an
|
||||
implementation of this high-level API.
|
||||
|
||||
Note: this document drafting has been started at Pixar with partners.
|
||||
|
||||
"Next-gen" back-ends
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Implement Osd Evaluator and Patch Drawing for next-gen GPU APIs such as
|
||||
Mantle, Metal, DX12, Vulkan.
|
||||
|
||||
A means to control edge curvature
|
||||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
Edge sharpness provides insufficient control over the overall contour of the
|
||||
surfaces. Artists often duplicate edge-loops around semi-sharp edges in
|
||||
order to control the local surface curvature. Ideally, they would like to be
|
||||
able to specify a radius of curvature that produces circular rounded edges.
|
||||
This will likely require the introduction of non-uniform rational splines
|
||||
(NURCCS ?) in OpenSubdiv.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Always in Need of Improvement
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
|
||||
And finally, a few topics that always benefit from continual improvement.
|
||||
Any and all contributions in this area are greatly appreciated.
|
||||
|
||||
Regression testing
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
OpenSubdiv currently ships with some regression testing code which can be
|
||||
run using CTest. It's always great to have more regression testing that
|
||||
covers more of the code base.
|
||||
|
||||
* Implement a robust regression harness for numerical correctness
|
||||
* Implement a cross-platform regression harness for GPU drawing correctness
|
||||
* Implement a cross-platform regression harness for performance (speed & memory)
|
||||
* Implement code coverage analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation
|
||||
+++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
In order to facilitate adoption of OpenSubdiv, we need to provide clear,
|
||||
concise and comprehensive documentation of all APIs. In particular:
|
||||
|
||||
* Update and flesh out high-level ReST documentation
|
||||
* Clean up the Doxygen documentation
|
||||
* Expand code tutorials
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user