This is not necessary, as we must emit an invalidating store before we
potentially consume an invalid expression. In fact, we're a bit
conservative here in this case for example:
int tmp = variable;
if (...)
{
variable = 10;
}
else
{
// Consuming tmp here is fine, but it was
// invalidated while emitting other branch.
// Technically, we need to study if there is an invalidating store
// in the CFG between the loading block and this block, and the other
// branch will not be a part of that analysis.
int tmp2 = tmp * tmp;
}
Fixing this case means complex CFG traversal *everywhere*, and it feels like overkill.
Fixing this exposed a bug with access chains, so fix a bug where expression dependencies were not
inherited properly in access chains. Access chains are now considered forwarded if there
is at least one dependency which is also forwarded.
Return after loading the input control point array if there are more
input points than output points, and this was one of the helper
invocations spun off to load the input points. I was hesitant to do this
initially, since the MSL spec has this to say about barriers:
> The `threadgroup_barrier` (or `simdgroup_barrier`) function must be
> encountered by all threads in a threadgroup (or SIMD-group) executing
> the kernel.
That is, if any thread executes the barrier, then all threads must
execute it, or the barrier'd invocations will hang. But, the key words
here seem to be "executing the kernel;" inactive invocations, those that
have already returned, need not encounter the barrier to prevent hangs.
Indeed, I've encountered no problems from doing this, at least on my
hardware. This also fixes a few CTS tests that were failing due to
execution ordering; apparently, my assumption that the later, invalid
data written by the helpers would get overwritten was wrong.
These are transpiled to kernel functions that write the output of the
shader to three buffers: one for per-vertex varyings, one for per-patch
varyings, and one for the tessellation levels. This structure is
mandated by the way Metal works, where the tessellation factors are
supplied to the draw method in their own buffer, while the per-patch and
per-vertex varyings are supplied as though they were vertex attributes;
since they have different step rates, they must be in separate buffers.
The kernel is expected to be run in a workgroup whose size is the
greater of the number of input or output control points. It uses Metal's
support for vertex-style stage input to a compute shader to get the
input values; therefore, at least one instance must run per input point.
Meanwhile, Vulkan mandates that it run at least once per output point.
Overrunning the output array is a concern, but any values written should
either be discarded or overwritten by subsequent patches. I'm probably
going to put some slop space in the buffer when I integrate this into
MoltenVK to be on the safe side.
