* Also mark function parameters as varying
* Conservatively mark assignment instructions as varying if any input is
varying after attempting to fold
* Added a test to catch this case
* Now track propagation status and assert on bad statuses
* Added helper methods to access instruction propagation status
* Modified the phi meet operator to properly reflect the paper it is
based on
* Modified SSA edge addition so that all edge are added, but only on
state changes
* Fixed a bug in instruction simulation where interesting conditional
branches would not mark the interesting edge as executed
* Added a test to catch this bug
* Added an ostream operator for SSAPropagator::PropStatus
* Forces traversal of phis if the def has changed to varying
* Mark a phi as varying if all incoming values are varying
* added a test to catch the bug
At the moment specialization constants look like constants to ccp. This
causes a problem because they are handled differently by the constant
manager.
I choose to simply skip over them, and not try to add them to the value
table. We can do specialization before ccp if we want to be able to
propagate these values.
Fixes#1199.
The current code expects the users of the constant manager to initialize
it with all of the constants in the module. The problem is that you do
not want to redo the work multiple times. So I decided to move that
code to the constructor of the constant manager. This way it will
always be initialized on first use.
I also removed an assert that expects all constant instructions to be
successfully mapped. This is because not all OpConstant* instruction
can map to a constant, and neither do the OpSpecConstant* instructions.
The real problem is that an OpConstantComposite can contain a member
that is OpUndef. I tried to treat OpUndef like OpConstantNull, but this
failed because an OpSpecConstantComposite with an OpUndef cannot be
changed to an OpConstantComposite. Since I feel this case will not be
common, I decided to not complicate the code.
Fixes#1193.
The current folding routines have a very cumbersome interface, make them
harder to use, and not a obvious how to extend.
This change is to create a new interface for the folding routines, and
show how it can be used by calling it from CCP.
This does not make a significant change to the behaviour of CCP. In
general it should produce the same code as before; however it is
possible that an instruction that takes 32-bit integers as inputs and
the result is not a 32-bit integer or bool will not be folded as before.
This fixes https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1143.
When an instruction transitions from constant to bottom (varying) in the
lattice, we were telling the propagator that the instruction was
varying, but never updating the actual value in the values table.
This led to incorrect value substitutions at the end of propagation.
The patch also re-enables CCP in -O and -Os.
In CCP we should not need to insert Phi nodes because CCP never looks at
loads/stores. This required adjusting two tests that relied on Phi
instructions being inserted. I changed the tests to have the Phi
instructions pre-inserted.
I also added a new test to make sure that CCP does not try to look
through stores and loads.
Finally, given that CCP does not handle loads/stores, it's better to run
mem2reg before it. I've changed the -O/-Os schedules to run local
multi-store elimination before CCP.
Although this is just an efficiency fix for CCP, it is
also working around a bug in Phi insertion. When Phi instructions are
inserted, they are never associated a basic block. This causes a
segfault when the propagator tries to lookup CFG edges when analyzing
Phi instructions.
This addresses review feedback for the CCP implementation (which fixes
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/889).
This adds more protection around the folding of instructions that would
not be supported by the folder.
This implements the conditional constant propagation pass proposed in
Constant propagation with conditional branches,
Wegman and Zadeck, ACM TOPLAS 13(2):181-210.
The main logic resides in CCPPass::VisitInstruction. Instruction that
may produce a constant value are evaluated with the constant folder. If
they produce a new constant, the instruction is considered interesting.
Otherwise, it's considered varying (for unfoldable instructions) or
just not interesting (when not enough operands have a constant value).
The other main piece of logic is in CCPPass::VisitBranch. This
evaluates the selector of the branch. When it's found to be a known
value, it computes the destination basic block and sets it. This tells
the propagator which branches to follow.
The patch required extensions to the constant manager as well. Instead
of hashing the Constant pointers, this patch changes the constant pool
to hash the contents of the Constant. This allows the lookups to be
done using the actual values of the Constant, preventing duplicate
definitions.
