Many of the files have using std::<foo> statements in them, but then the
use of <foo> will be inconsistently std::<foo> or <foo> scattered
through the file. This CL removes all of the using statements and
updates the code to have the required std:: prefix.
This CL moves the validation code to the val:: namespace. This makes it
clearer which instance of the Instruction and other classes are being
referred too.
Re-formatted the source tree with the command:
$ /usr/bin/clang-format -style=file -i \
$(find include source tools test utils -name '*.cpp' -or -name '*.h')
This required a fix to source/val/decoration.h. It was not including
spirv.h, which broke builds when the #include headers were re-ordered by
clang-format.
NFC. This just makes sure every file is formatted following the
formatting definition in .clang-format.
Re-formatted with:
$ clang-format -i $(find source tools include -name '*.cpp')
$ clang-format -i $(find source tools include -name '*.h')
Create class to encapsulate control flow analysis and share across
validator and optimizer. A WIP. Start with DepthFirstTraversal. Next
pull in CalculateDominators.
entry_block_to_construct_ maps an entry block to its construct. The key
in this map (the entry block) is not unique, and therefore the entry for
the continue construct gets overwritten when the selection construct is
discovered.
Since a given block may be the entry block of different types of
constructs, the (basic_block, construct_type) pair should be able to
uniquely identify the construct.
Adds test:
- In this test, a basic block is the entry block of a continue construct
as well as the entry block of a selection construct.
It can be shown that this unit test would crash without the fix in this
PR and passes with the fix in this PR.
According to Section 2.17 (Universal Limits) of the SPIR-V Spec, the
control flow nesting depth may not be larger than 1023.
This is checked only when we are required to have structured
control flow. Otherwise it's not clear how to compute control
flow nesting depth.
