* Don't fold specialized branchs in loop unswitch
Folding branches can have a lot of special cases, and can be a little
error prone. So I only want it in one place. That will be in dead
branch elimination. I will change loop unswitching to set the branches
that were being folded to have a constant condition. Then subsequent
pass of dead branch elimination will be able to remove the code.
At the same time, I added a check that loop unswitching will not
unswitch a branch with a constant condition. It is not useful to do it
because dead branch elimination will simple fold the branch anyway.
Also it avoid an infinite loop that would other wise be introduced by my
first change.
Fixes#2203.
Loop unswitching is unswitching the conditional branch that creates the
back-edge. In the version of the loop, where the bachedge is not taken,
there is no back-edge. This is what causes the validator to complain.
The solution I will go with will be to now unswitch a condition with a
back-edge. At this time we do not now if loop unswitching is used. We do
not include it in the optimization sets provided, nor is it used in
glslang's set. When there are opportunities and no breaks from the loop,
the loop with either be a single iteration loop, or an infinite loop.
There is no performance advantage to performing loop unswitching in
either of those cases. If there is a break, maintaining structured
control flow will be tricky. Unless we see a clear advantage to handling
these case, I would go with the safer simpler solution.
Fixes#2201.
If there are multiple edges to a basic block, then the ssa rewriter will
create OpPhi instructions with duplicate entries. This is invalid, and
it is fixed in this commit.
Fixes#2202.
* Invalidate the decoration manager at the start of ADCE.
If the decoration manager is kept live the the contex will try to keep
it up to date. ADCE deals with group decorations by changing the
operands in |OpGroupDecorate| instructions directly without informing
the decoration manager. This puts it in an invalid state, which will
cause an error when the context tries to update it. To Avoid this
problem, we will invalidate the decoration manager upfront.
At the same time, the decoration manager is now considered when checking
the consistency of the decoration manager.
* Fix invalid OpPhi generated by merge-return.
When we create a new phi node for a value say %10, we have to replace
all of the uses of %10 that are no longer dominated by the def of %10
by the result id of the new phi. However, if the use is in a phi node,
it is possible that the bb contains the use is not dominated by either.
In this case, needs to be handled differently.
* Split loop headers before add a new branch to them.
In merge return, Phi node in loop header that are also merges for loop
do not get updated correctly. Those cases do not fit in with our
current analysis. Doing this will simplify the code by reducing the
number of cases that have to be handled.
Added documentation to the ir context to indicates that TakeNextId()
returns 0 when the max id is reached. TODOs were added to each call
sight so that we know where we have to start to handle this case.
Handle id overflow in |SplitLoopHeader|.
Handle id overflow in |GetOrCreatePreHeaderBlock|.
Handle failure to create preheader in LICM.
Part of https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1841.
We currently simulate all shift operations when the two operand are
constants. The problem is that if the shift amount is larger than
32, the result is undefined.
I'm changing the folder to return 0 if the shift value is too high.
That way, we will have defined behaviour.
https://crbug.com/910937.
Upgrade to VulkanKHR memory model
* Converts Logical GLSL450 memory model to Logical VulkanKHR
* Adds extension and capability
* Removes deprecated decorations and replaces them with appropriate
flags on downstream instructions
* Support for Workgroup upgrades
* Support for copy memory
* Adding support for image functions
* Adding barrier upgrades and tests
* Use QueueFamilyKHR scope instead of device
* Move ProcessFunction* function from pass to the context.
There are a few functions that are used to traverse the call tree.
They currently live in the Pass class, but they have nothing to do with
a pass, and may be needed outside of a pass. They would be better in
the ir context, or in a specific call tree class if we ever have a need
for it.
* Don't inline recursive functions.
Inlining does not check if a function is recursive or not. This has
been fine as long as the shader was a Vulkan shader, which forbid
recursive functions. However, not all shaders are vulkan, so either
we limit inlining to Vulkan shaders or we teach it to look for recursive
functions.
I prefer to keep the passes as general as is reasonable. The change
does not require much new code in inlining and gives a reason to refactor
some other code.
The changes are to add a member function to the Function class that
checks if that function is recursive or not.
Then this is used in inlining to not inlining a function call if it calls
a recursive function.
* Add id to function analysis
There are a few places that build a map from ids to Function whose
result is that id. I decided to add an analysis to the context for this
to reduce that code, and simplify some of the functions.
* Add missing file.
* Added a reduction pass to replace ids with ids of the same type that dominate them.
* Introduce helper method for querying whether an operand type is an input id.
These are bookend passes designed to help preserve line information
across passes which delete, move and clone instructions. The propagation
pass attaches a debug line instruction to every instruction based on
SPIR-V line propagation rules. It should be performed before optimization.
The redundant line elimination pass eliminates all line instructions
which match the previous line instruction. This pass should be performed
at the end of optimization to reduce physical SPIR-V file size.
Fixes#2027.
The type manager in spirv-opt currently asserts if a function parameter
has type void. It is not exactly clear from the spec that this is
disallowed, even if it probably will be disallowed. In either case,
asserts should be used to verify assumptions that will actually make a
difference to the code. As far as the optimizer is concerned, a void
parameter does not matter. I don't see the point of the assert. I'll
just remove it and let the validator decide whether to accept it or not.
No test was added because it is not clear that it is legal, and should
not force us to accept it in the future unless the spec make it clear
that it is legal.
Fixes crbug.com/903088.
That function currently only handled OpPtrAccessChain if it was in the
middle of the chain, but not at the start. Fixing that up.
Fixes crbug.com/905271.
* Add base and core bindless validation instrumentation classes
* Fix formatting.
* Few more formatting fixes
* Fix build failure
* More build fixes
* Need to call non-const functions in order.
Specifically, these are functions which call TakeNextId(). These need to
be called in a specific order to guarantee that tests which do exact
compares will work across all platforms. c++ pretty much does not
guarantee order of evaluation of operands, so any such functions need to
be called separately in individual statements to guarantee order.
* More ordering.
* And more ordering.
* And more formatting.
* Attempt to fix NDK build
* Another attempt to address NDK build problem.
* One more attempt at NDK build failure
* Add instrument.hpp to BUILD.gn
* Some name improvement in instrument.hpp
* Change all types in instrument.hpp to int.
* Improve documentation in instrument.hpp
* Format fixes
* Comment clean up in instrument.hpp
* imageInst -> image_inst
* Fix GetLabel() issue.
If there is only 1 return and it is in a loop, then the function cannot be inlined.
Fix condition when inlined code needs one-trip loop wrapper. The dummy loop is needed when there is a return inside a selection construct. Even if there is only 1 return.
When looking for a break from a selection construct, we do not realize
that a jump to the continue target of a loop containing the selection
is a break. This causes and infinit loop, or possibly other failures.
Fixes#2004.
When looking for a break from a selection construct, we do not need to
look inside nested constructs. However, if a loop header has an
unconditional branch, then we enter the loop. Entering the loop causes
an infinite loop because we keep going through the loop.
The solution is to look for a merge block, if one exsits, even for block
terminated by an OpBranch.
Fixes#1979.
ADCE liveness algorithm should treat OpUnreachable at least like other
branch instructions. It was being treated as always live which was
preventing useless structured constructs from being eliminated.
OpUnreachable is generated by dead branch elimination which is now
being required by merge return, so this fix should accompany that
change.
We currently run merge-return on all functions, but
dead-branch-elimination only runs on function reachable from an entry
point or exported function. Since dead-branch-elimination is needed for
merge-return, they have to match.
Fixes#1976.
Was removing control structures which didn't have data dependency
with enclosed live loop and otherwise did not contain live code.
An example is a counting loop around a live loop.
Fixes#1967.
Consider atomics that load when analyzing live stores in ADCE.
Previously it asserted that the base of an OpImageTexelPointer should
be an image. It is actually a pointer to an image, so IsValidBasePointer
should suffice.
Merge return assumes that the only unreachable blocks are those needed
to keep the structured cfg valid. Even those must be essentially empty
blocks.
If this is not the case, we get unpredictable behaviour. This commit
add a check in merge return, and emits an error if it is not the case.
Added a pass of dead branch elimination before merge return in both the
performance and size passes. It is a precondition of merge return.
Fixes#1962.
The current implementation in the folder when seeing a division by zero
is to assert. In the release build, the compiler will attempt to
compute the value, which causes its own problems.
The solution I will go with is to fold the division, and just give it
the value of 0. The same goes for remainder and mod operations.
Fixes#1961.
The HlslCounterBufferGOOGLE that was introduced changed the OpDecorateId
so that is can now reference an id other than the target. If that other
id is used only in the decoration, then the definition of the id will be
removed because decoration do not count as real uses.
However, if the target of the decoration is still live the decoration
will not be removed. This leaves a reference to an id that is not
defined.
There are two solutions to consider. The first is that is the decoration
is kept, then the definition of the id should be kept live. Implementing
this change would be involved because the way ADCE handles decorations
will have to be reimplemented.
The other solution is to remove the decoration the id is otherwise dead.
This works for this specific case. Also this is the more desirable
behaviour in this case. The id will always be the id of a variable that
belongs to a descriptor set. If that variable is not bound and we do
not remove it, the driver will complain.
I chose to implement the second solution. The first will be left to when
a case for it comes up.
Fixes https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1885.
There are a few spots where copy propagate arrays is trying
to go from a Type to an id, but the type is not unique. When generating
code this pass needs specific ids, otherwise we get type mismatches.
However, the ambigous types means we can sometimes get the wrong type
and generate invalid code.
That code has been rewritten to not rely on the type manager, and just
look at the instructions instead.
I have opened https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1939 to
try to get a way to make this more robust.
* Analyze uses for all instructions.
The def-use manager needs to fill in the `inst_to_used_ids_` field for
every instruction. This means we have to analyze the uses for every
instruction, even if they do not have any uses.
This mistake was not found earlier because there was a typo in the
equality check for def-use managers. No new tests are needed.
While looking into this I found redundant work in block merge. Cleaning
that up at the same time.
* Fix other transformations
Aggressive dead code elimination did not update the OpGroupDecorate
and the OpGroupMemberDecorate instructions properly when they are
updated. That is fixed.
Dead branch elimination did not analyze the OpUnreachable instructions
that is would add. That is taken care of.
In DecorationManager::RemoveDecorationsFrom, we do not remove the id
from a decoration group if the group has no decorations. This causes
problems because KillNamesAndDecorates is suppose to remove all
references to the id, but in this case, there is still a reference.
This is fixed by adding a special case.
Also, there is the possibility of a double free because
RemoveDecorationsFrom will delete the instructions defining |id| when
|id| is a decoration group. Later, KillInst would later write to memory
that has been deleted when trying to turn it into a Nop. To fix this,
we will only remove the decorations that use |id| and not its definition
in RemoveDecorationsFrom.
Add code to keep the def-use manger and the inst-to-block mapping up-to-date. This means we do not have to rebuild them later.
To make this work, we will have to have to find places to update the
def-use manager. Updating the def-use manager is not straight forward
because we are unrolling loops, and we have circular references.
This forces one pass to register all of the definitions. A second one
to analyze the uses. Also because there will be references to the new
instructions in the old code, we want to register the definitions of the
new instructions early, so we can update the uses of the older code as
we go along.
The inst-to-block mapping is not too difficult. It can be done as instructions are created.
Fixes#1928.
A limit of 0 for the scalar replacement options it used to indicate that
there is no limit. The current implementation does not allow 0. This
should be fixed.
