In DecorationManager::RemoveDecorationsFrom, we do not remove the id
from a decoration group if the group has no decorations. This causes
problems because KillNamesAndDecorates is suppose to remove all
references to the id, but in this case, there is still a reference.
This is fixed by adding a special case.
Also, there is the possibility of a double free because
RemoveDecorationsFrom will delete the instructions defining |id| when
|id| is a decoration group. Later, KillInst would later write to memory
that has been deleted when trying to turn it into a Nop. To fix this,
we will only remove the decorations that use |id| and not its definition
in RemoveDecorationsFrom.
* Copy decorations when creating new ids.
When creating a new value based on an old value, we need to copy the
decorations to the new id. This change does this in 3 places:
1) The variable holding the return value of the function generated by
merge return should get decorations from the function.
2) The results of the OpPhi instructions should get decorations from the
variable they are replacing in the ssa writer.
3) In local access chain convert the intermediate struct (result of
OpCompositeInsert) generated for the store replacement should get its
decorations from the variable being stored to.
Fixes#1787.
This CL moves the files in opt/ to consistenly be under the opt::
namespace. This frees up the ir:: namespace so it can be used to make a
shared ir represenation.
This reimplementation fixes several issues when removing decorations associated
to an ID (partially addresses #1174 and gives tools for fixing #898), as well
as making it easier to remove groups; a few additional tests have been added.
DecorationManager::RemoveDecoration() will still not delete dead decorations it
created, but I do not think it is its job either; given the following input
```
OpCapability Shader
OpCapability Linkage
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpDecorate %2 Restrict
%2 = OpDecorationGroup
OpGroupDecorate %2 %1 %3
OpDecorate %4 Invariant
%4 = OpDecorationGroup
OpGroupDecorate %4 %2
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%1 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
%3 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
```
which of the following two outputs would you expect RemoveDecoration(2) to produce:
```
OpCapability Shader
OpCapability Linkage
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%1 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
%3 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
```
or
```
OpCapability Shader
OpCapability Linkage
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpDecorate %4 Invariant
%4 = OpDecorationGroup
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%1 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
%3 = OpVariable %uint Uniform
```
Fixes https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/924
Fixes https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1174
In order to keep track of all of the implicit capabilities as well as
the explicit ones, we will add them all to the feature manager. That is
the object that needs to be queried when checking if a capability is
enabled.
The name of the "HasCapability" function in the module was changed to
make it more obvious that it does not check for implied capabilities.
Keep an spv_context and AssemblyGrammar in IRContext