I mixed up two cases when folding an OpCompositeExtract that is feed by
and OpCompositeInsert. The specific cases are demonstracted in the new
test. I mixed up the conditions for the cases, and treated one like the
other.
Fixes#1323.
This change handles all 6 regular comparison types in two variations,
ordered (true if values are ordered *and* comparison is true) and
unordered (true if values are unordered *or* comparison is true).
Ordered comparison matches the default floating-point behavior on host
but we use std::isnan to check ordering explicitly anyway.
This change also slightly reworks the floating-point folding support
code to make it possible to define a folding operation that returns
boolean instead of floating point.
These tests exhaustively test ordered/unordered comparisons for
float/double.
Since for NaN inputs the comparison result doesn't depend on the
comparison function, we just test == and !=; NaN inputs result in true
unordered comparisons and false ordered comparisons.
We can fold OpSelect into one of the operands in two cases:
- condition is constant
- both results are the same
Even if the original shader doesn't have either of these, if-conversion
pass sometimes ends up generating instructions like
%7127 = OpSelect %int %3220 %7058 %7058
And this optimization cleans them up.
Implementation of the simplification pass.
- Create pass that calls the instruction folder on each instruction and
propagate instructions that fold to a copy. This will do copy
propagation as well.
- Did not use the propagator engine because I want to modify the instruction
as we go along.
- Change folding to not allocate new instructions, but make changes in
place. This change had a big impact on compile time.
- Add simplification pass to the legalization passes in place of
insert-extract elimination.
- Added test cases for new folding rules.
- Added tests for the simplification pass
- Added a method to the CFG to apply a function to the basic blocks in
reverse post order.
Contributes to #1164.
Create the folding engine that will
1) attempt to fold an instruction.
2) iterates on the folding so small folding rules can be easily combined.
3) insert new instructions when needed.
I've added the minimum number of rules needed to test the features above.
The current folding routines have a very cumbersome interface, make them
harder to use, and not a obvious how to extend.
This change is to create a new interface for the folding routines, and
show how it can be used by calling it from CCP.
This does not make a significant change to the behaviour of CCP. In
general it should produce the same code as before; however it is
possible that an instruction that takes 32-bit integers as inputs and
the result is not a 32-bit integer or bool will not be folded as before.
It seems like andriod has a problem with INT32_MAX and the like. I'll
explicitly define those if the are not already defined.
