Issues #2898 and #2900 identify some cases where adding a dead
continue would lead to an invalid module, and these turned out to be
due to the lack of sensible dominance information when a continue
target is unreachable. This change requires that the header of a loop
dominates the loop's continue target if a dead continue is to be
added.
Furthermore, issue #2905 identified a shortcoming in the algorithm
being used to identify when it is OK, from a dominance point of view,
to add a new break/continue edge to a control flow graph. This change
replaces that algorithm with a simpler and more obviously correct
algorithm (that incidentally does not require the new edge to be a
break/continue edge in particular).
Fixes#2898.
Fixes#2900.
Fixes#2905.
The implementation of these passes had overlooked the fact that adding
a new edge to a control flow graph can change dominance information.
Adding a dead break/continue risks causing uses to no longer be
dominated by their definitions. This change introduces various tests
to expose such scenarios, and augments the preconditions for these
transformations with checks to guard against the situation.
Similar to the existing 'add dead breaks' pass, this adds a pass to
add dead continues to blocks in loops where such a transformation is
viable. Various functionality common to this new pass and 'add dead
breaks' has been factored into 'fuzzer_util', and some small
improvements to 'add dead breaks' that were identified while reviewing
that code again have been applied.
Fixes#2719.
