* Don't fold specialized branchs in loop unswitch
Folding branches can have a lot of special cases, and can be a little
error prone. So I only want it in one place. That will be in dead
branch elimination. I will change loop unswitching to set the branches
that were being folded to have a constant condition. Then subsequent
pass of dead branch elimination will be able to remove the code.
At the same time, I added a check that loop unswitching will not
unswitch a branch with a constant condition. It is not useful to do it
because dead branch elimination will simple fold the branch anyway.
Also it avoid an infinite loop that would other wise be introduced by my
first change.
Fixes#2203.
Loop unswitching is unswitching the conditional branch that creates the
back-edge. In the version of the loop, where the bachedge is not taken,
there is no back-edge. This is what causes the validator to complain.
The solution I will go with will be to now unswitch a condition with a
back-edge. At this time we do not now if loop unswitching is used. We do
not include it in the optimization sets provided, nor is it used in
glslang's set. When there are opportunities and no breaks from the loop,
the loop with either be a single iteration loop, or an infinite loop.
There is no performance advantage to performing loop unswitching in
either of those cases. If there is a break, maintaining structured
control flow will be tricky. Unless we see a clear advantage to handling
these case, I would go with the safer simpler solution.
Fixes#2201.
It moves all conditional branching and switch whose conditions are loop
invariant and uniform. Before performing the loop unswitch we check that
the loop does not contain any instruction that would prevent it
(barriers, group instructions etc.).
