The passes that add dead breaks and continues suffer from the
challenge that a new control flow graph edge can change dominance
information, leading to the potenital for definitions to no longer
dominate their uses. The attempt at guarding against this was known
to be incomplete. This change calls on the SPIR-V validator to do the
necessary checking: in deciding whether adding such an edge would be
legitimate, we clone the module, add the edge, and use the validator
to check whether the transformed clone is valid.
This strategy is heavy-weight, and should be used sparingly, but seems
like a good option when the validity of transformations is intricate,
to avoid reimplementing swathes of validation logic in the fuzzer.
Fixes#2919.
* Validate that if a construct contains a header and it's merge is
reachable, the construct also contains the merge
* updated block merging to not merge into the continue
* update inlining to mark the original block of a single block loop as
the continue
* updated some tests
* remove dead code
* rename kBlockTypeHeader to kBlockTypeSelection for clarity
Issue #2919 identifies a problem in spirv-fuzz's ability to determine
when it is safe to add a new control flow edge without breaking
dominance rules. This change adds a (currently disabled) test to
expose the issue, and a comment to document that the current solution
is incomplete.
Issues #2898 and #2900 identify some cases where adding a dead
continue would lead to an invalid module, and these turned out to be
due to the lack of sensible dominance information when a continue
target is unreachable. This change requires that the header of a loop
dominates the loop's continue target if a dead continue is to be
added.
Furthermore, issue #2905 identified a shortcoming in the algorithm
being used to identify when it is OK, from a dominance point of view,
to add a new break/continue edge to a control flow graph. This change
replaces that algorithm with a simpler and more obviously correct
algorithm (that incidentally does not require the new edge to be a
break/continue edge in particular).
Fixes#2898.
Fixes#2900.
Fixes#2905.
The implementation of these passes had overlooked the fact that adding
a new edge to a control flow graph can change dominance information.
Adding a dead break/continue risks causing uses to no longer be
dominated by their definitions. This change introduces various tests
to expose such scenarios, and augments the preconditions for these
transformations with checks to guard against the situation.
Similar to the existing 'add dead breaks' pass, this adds a pass to
add dead continues to blocks in loops where such a transformation is
viable. Various functionality common to this new pass and 'add dead
breaks' has been factored into 'fuzzer_util', and some small
improvements to 'add dead breaks' that were identified while reviewing
that code again have been applied.
Fixes#2719.
