Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Diego Novillo
e5560d64de Fix constant propagation of induction variables.
This fixes https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1143.
When an instruction transitions from constant to bottom (varying) in the
lattice, we were telling the propagator that the instruction was
varying, but never updating the actual value in the values table.

This led to incorrect value substitutions at the end of propagation.

The patch also re-enables CCP in -O and -Os.
2018-01-08 15:34:35 -05:00
Diego Novillo
135150a1a8 Do not insert Phi nodes in CCP propagator.
In CCP we should not need to insert Phi nodes because CCP never looks at
loads/stores.  This required adjusting two tests that relied on Phi
instructions being inserted.  I changed the tests to have the Phi
instructions pre-inserted.

I also added a new test to make sure that CCP does not try to look
through stores and loads.

Finally, given that CCP does not handle loads/stores, it's better to run
mem2reg before it.  I've changed the -O/-Os schedules to run local
multi-store elimination before CCP.

Although this is just an efficiency fix for CCP, it is
also working around a bug in Phi insertion.  When Phi instructions are
inserted, they are never associated a basic block.  This causes a
segfault when the propagator tries to lookup CFG edges when analyzing
Phi instructions.
2018-01-03 15:12:25 -05:00
Diego Novillo
1acce99255 Fix https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/1130
This addresses review feedback for the CCP implementation (which fixes
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/889).

This adds more protection around the folding of instructions that would
not be supported by the folder.
2017-12-22 13:33:17 -05:00
Diego Novillo
4ba9dcc8a0 Implement SSA CCP (SSA Conditional Constant Propagation).
This implements the conditional constant propagation pass proposed in

Constant propagation with conditional branches,
Wegman and Zadeck, ACM TOPLAS 13(2):181-210.

The main logic resides in CCPPass::VisitInstruction.  Instruction that
may produce a constant value are evaluated with the constant folder. If
they produce a new constant, the instruction is considered interesting.
Otherwise, it's considered varying (for unfoldable instructions) or
just not interesting (when not enough operands have a constant value).

The other main piece of logic is in CCPPass::VisitBranch.  This
evaluates the selector of the branch.  When it's found to be a known
value, it computes the destination basic block and sets it.  This tells
the propagator which branches to follow.

The patch required extensions to the constant manager as well. Instead
of hashing the Constant pointers, this patch changes the constant pool
to hash the contents of the Constant.  This allows the lookups to be
done using the actual values of the Constant, preventing duplicate
definitions.
2017-12-21 14:29:45 -05:00