mirror of
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools
synced 2024-12-26 01:31:06 +00:00
7dadcf9c76
Control dependence analysis constructs a control dependence graph, representing the conditions for a block's execution relative to the results of other blocks with conditional branches, etc. This is an analysis pass that will be useful for the linter and potentially also useful in opt. Currently it is unused except for the added unit tests.
157 lines
6.2 KiB
C++
157 lines
6.2 KiB
C++
// Copyright (c) 2021 Google LLC.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
#include "source/opt/control_dependence.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
#include <tuple>
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
#include "source/opt/basic_block.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/cfg.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/dominator_analysis.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/function.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/instruction.h"
|
|
#include "spirv/unified1/spirv.h"
|
|
|
|
// Computes the control dependence graph (CDG) using the algorithm in Cytron
|
|
// 1991, "Efficiently Computing Static Single Assignment Form and the Control
|
|
// Dependence Graph." It relies on the fact that the control dependence sources
|
|
// (blocks on which a block is control dependent) are exactly the post-dominance
|
|
// frontier for that block. The explanation and proofs are given in Section 6 of
|
|
// that paper.
|
|
// Link: https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~pingali/CS380C/2010/papers/ssaCytron.pdf
|
|
//
|
|
// The algorithm in Section 4.2 of the same paper is used to construct the
|
|
// dominance frontier. It uses the post-dominance tree, which is available in
|
|
// the IR context.
|
|
|
|
namespace spvtools {
|
|
namespace opt {
|
|
constexpr uint32_t ControlDependenceAnalysis::kPseudoEntryBlock;
|
|
|
|
uint32_t ControlDependence::GetConditionID(const CFG& cfg) const {
|
|
if (source_bb_id() == 0) {
|
|
// Entry dependence; return 0.
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
const BasicBlock* source_bb = cfg.block(source_bb_id());
|
|
const Instruction* branch = source_bb->terminator();
|
|
assert((branch->opcode() == SpvOpBranchConditional ||
|
|
branch->opcode() == SpvOpSwitch) &&
|
|
"invalid control dependence; last instruction must be conditional "
|
|
"branch or switch");
|
|
return branch->GetSingleWordInOperand(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ControlDependence::operator<(const ControlDependence& other) const {
|
|
return std::tie(source_bb_id_, target_bb_id_, branch_target_bb_id_) <
|
|
std::tie(other.source_bb_id_, other.target_bb_id_,
|
|
other.branch_target_bb_id_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ControlDependence::operator==(const ControlDependence& other) const {
|
|
return std::tie(source_bb_id_, target_bb_id_, branch_target_bb_id_) ==
|
|
std::tie(other.source_bb_id_, other.target_bb_id_,
|
|
other.branch_target_bb_id_);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const ControlDependence& dep) {
|
|
os << dep.source_bb_id() << "->" << dep.target_bb_id();
|
|
if (dep.branch_target_bb_id() != dep.target_bb_id()) {
|
|
os << " through " << dep.branch_target_bb_id();
|
|
}
|
|
return os;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ControlDependenceAnalysis::ComputePostDominanceFrontiers(
|
|
const CFG& cfg, const PostDominatorAnalysis& pdom) {
|
|
// Compute post-dominance frontiers (reverse graph).
|
|
// The dominance frontier for a block X is equal to (Equation 4)
|
|
// DF_local(X) U { B in DF_up(Z) | X = ipdom(Z) }
|
|
// (ipdom(Z) is the immediate post-dominator of Z.)
|
|
// where
|
|
// DF_local(X) = { Y | X -> Y in CFG, X does not strictly post-dominate Y }
|
|
// represents the contribution of X's predecessors to the DF, and
|
|
// DF_up(Z) = { Y | Y in DF(Z), ipdom(Z) does not strictly post-dominate Y }
|
|
// (note: ipdom(Z) = X.)
|
|
// represents the contribution of a block to its immediate post-
|
|
// dominator's DF.
|
|
// This is computed in one pass through a post-order traversal of the
|
|
// post-dominator tree.
|
|
|
|
// Assert that there is a block other than the pseudo exit in the pdom tree,
|
|
// as we need one to get the function entry point (as the pseudo exit is not
|
|
// actually part of the function.)
|
|
assert(!cfg.IsPseudoExitBlock(pdom.GetDomTree().post_begin()->bb_));
|
|
Function* function = pdom.GetDomTree().post_begin()->bb_->GetParent();
|
|
uint32_t function_entry = function->entry()->id();
|
|
// Explicitly initialize pseudo-entry block, as it doesn't depend on anything,
|
|
// so it won't be initialized in the following loop.
|
|
reverse_nodes_[kPseudoEntryBlock] = {};
|
|
for (auto it = pdom.GetDomTree().post_cbegin();
|
|
it != pdom.GetDomTree().post_cend(); ++it) {
|
|
ComputePostDominanceFrontierForNode(cfg, pdom, function_entry, *it);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ControlDependenceAnalysis::ComputePostDominanceFrontierForNode(
|
|
const CFG& cfg, const PostDominatorAnalysis& pdom, uint32_t function_entry,
|
|
const DominatorTreeNode& pdom_node) {
|
|
const uint32_t label = pdom_node.id();
|
|
ControlDependenceList& edges = reverse_nodes_[label];
|
|
for (uint32_t pred : cfg.preds(label)) {
|
|
if (!pdom.StrictlyDominates(label, pred)) {
|
|
edges.push_back(ControlDependence(pred, label));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (label == function_entry) {
|
|
// Add edge from pseudo-entry to entry.
|
|
// In CDG construction, an edge is added from entry to exit, so only the
|
|
// exit node can post-dominate entry.
|
|
edges.push_back(ControlDependence(kPseudoEntryBlock, label));
|
|
}
|
|
for (DominatorTreeNode* child : pdom_node) {
|
|
// Note: iterate dependences by value, as we need a copy.
|
|
for (const ControlDependence& dep : reverse_nodes_[child->id()]) {
|
|
// Special-case pseudo-entry, as above.
|
|
if (dep.source_bb_id() == kPseudoEntryBlock ||
|
|
!pdom.StrictlyDominates(label, dep.source_bb_id())) {
|
|
edges.push_back(ControlDependence(dep.source_bb_id(), label,
|
|
dep.branch_target_bb_id()));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ControlDependenceAnalysis::ComputeControlDependenceGraph(
|
|
const CFG& cfg, const PostDominatorAnalysis& pdom) {
|
|
ComputePostDominanceFrontiers(cfg, pdom);
|
|
ComputeForwardGraphFromReverse();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ControlDependenceAnalysis::ComputeForwardGraphFromReverse() {
|
|
for (const auto& entry : reverse_nodes_) {
|
|
// Ensure an entry is created for each node.
|
|
forward_nodes_[entry.first];
|
|
for (const ControlDependence& dep : entry.second) {
|
|
forward_nodes_[dep.source_bb_id()].push_back(dep);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace opt
|
|
} // namespace spvtools
|