mirror of
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools
synced 2024-12-13 04:00:08 +00:00
eda2cfbe12
This Cl cleans up the include paths to be relative to the top level directory. Various include-what-you-use fixes have been added.
1676 lines
64 KiB
C++
1676 lines
64 KiB
C++
// Copyright (c) 2018 Google LLC.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
#include "source/opt/loop_dependence.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <functional>
|
|
#include <memory>
|
|
#include <numeric>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
#include <vector>
|
|
|
|
#include "source/opt/instruction.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/scalar_analysis.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/scalar_analysis_nodes.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace spvtools {
|
|
namespace opt {
|
|
|
|
using SubscriptPair = std::pair<SENode*, SENode*>;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
// Calculate the greatest common divisor of a & b using Stein's algorithm.
|
|
// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_GCD_algorithm
|
|
int64_t GreatestCommonDivisor(int64_t a, int64_t b) {
|
|
// Simple cases
|
|
if (a == b) {
|
|
return a;
|
|
} else if (a == 0) {
|
|
return b;
|
|
} else if (b == 0) {
|
|
return a;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both even
|
|
if (a % 2 == 0 && b % 2 == 0) {
|
|
return 2 * GreatestCommonDivisor(a / 2, b / 2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Even a, odd b
|
|
if (a % 2 == 0 && b % 2 == 1) {
|
|
return GreatestCommonDivisor(a / 2, b);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Odd a, even b
|
|
if (a % 2 == 1 && b % 2 == 0) {
|
|
return GreatestCommonDivisor(a, b / 2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both odd, reduce the larger argument
|
|
if (a > b) {
|
|
return GreatestCommonDivisor((a - b) / 2, b);
|
|
} else {
|
|
return GreatestCommonDivisor((b - a) / 2, a);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check if node is affine, ie in the form: a0*i0 + a1*i1 + ... an*in + c
|
|
// and contains only the following types of nodes: SERecurrentNode, SEAddNode
|
|
// and SEConstantNode
|
|
bool IsInCorrectFormForGCDTest(SENode* node) {
|
|
bool children_ok = true;
|
|
|
|
if (auto add_node = node->AsSEAddNode()) {
|
|
for (auto child : add_node->GetChildren()) {
|
|
children_ok &= IsInCorrectFormForGCDTest(child);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool this_ok = node->AsSERecurrentNode() || node->AsSEAddNode() ||
|
|
node->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
|
|
return children_ok && this_ok;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If |node| is an SERecurrentNode then returns |node| or if |node| is an
|
|
// SEAddNode returns a vector of SERecurrentNode that are its children.
|
|
std::vector<SERecurrentNode*> GetAllTopLevelRecurrences(SENode* node) {
|
|
auto nodes = std::vector<SERecurrentNode*>{};
|
|
if (auto recurrent_node = node->AsSERecurrentNode()) {
|
|
nodes.push_back(recurrent_node);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (auto add_node = node->AsSEAddNode()) {
|
|
for (auto child : add_node->GetChildren()) {
|
|
auto child_nodes = GetAllTopLevelRecurrences(child);
|
|
nodes.insert(nodes.end(), child_nodes.begin(), child_nodes.end());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nodes;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If |node| is an SEConstantNode then returns |node| or if |node| is an
|
|
// SEAddNode returns a vector of SEConstantNode that are its children.
|
|
std::vector<SEConstantNode*> GetAllTopLevelConstants(SENode* node) {
|
|
auto nodes = std::vector<SEConstantNode*>{};
|
|
if (auto recurrent_node = node->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
nodes.push_back(recurrent_node);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (auto add_node = node->AsSEAddNode()) {
|
|
for (auto child : add_node->GetChildren()) {
|
|
auto child_nodes = GetAllTopLevelConstants(child);
|
|
nodes.insert(nodes.end(), child_nodes.begin(), child_nodes.end());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nodes;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool AreOffsetsAndCoefficientsConstant(
|
|
const std::vector<SERecurrentNode*>& nodes) {
|
|
for (auto node : nodes) {
|
|
if (!node->GetOffset()->AsSEConstantNode() ||
|
|
!node->GetOffset()->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fold all SEConstantNode that appear in |recurrences| and |constants| into a
|
|
// single integer value.
|
|
int64_t CalculateConstantTerm(const std::vector<SERecurrentNode*>& recurrences,
|
|
const std::vector<SEConstantNode*>& constants) {
|
|
int64_t constant_term = 0;
|
|
for (auto recurrence : recurrences) {
|
|
constant_term +=
|
|
recurrence->GetOffset()->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (auto constant : constants) {
|
|
constant_term += constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return constant_term;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int64_t CalculateGCDFromCoefficients(
|
|
const std::vector<SERecurrentNode*>& recurrences, int64_t running_gcd) {
|
|
for (SERecurrentNode* recurrence : recurrences) {
|
|
auto coefficient = recurrence->GetCoefficient()->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
|
|
running_gcd = GreatestCommonDivisor(
|
|
running_gcd, std::abs(coefficient->FoldToSingleValue()));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return running_gcd;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Compare 2 fractions while first normalizing them, e.g. 2/4 and 4/8 will both
|
|
// be simplified to 1/2 and then determined to be equal.
|
|
bool NormalizeAndCompareFractions(int64_t numerator_0, int64_t denominator_0,
|
|
int64_t numerator_1, int64_t denominator_1) {
|
|
auto gcd_0 =
|
|
GreatestCommonDivisor(std::abs(numerator_0), std::abs(denominator_0));
|
|
auto gcd_1 =
|
|
GreatestCommonDivisor(std::abs(numerator_1), std::abs(denominator_1));
|
|
|
|
auto normalized_numerator_0 = numerator_0 / gcd_0;
|
|
auto normalized_denominator_0 = denominator_0 / gcd_0;
|
|
auto normalized_numerator_1 = numerator_1 / gcd_1;
|
|
auto normalized_denominator_1 = denominator_1 / gcd_1;
|
|
|
|
return normalized_numerator_0 == normalized_numerator_1 &&
|
|
normalized_denominator_0 == normalized_denominator_1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::GetDependence(const Instruction* source,
|
|
const Instruction* destination,
|
|
DistanceVector* distance_vector) {
|
|
// Start off by finding and marking all the loops in |loops_| that are
|
|
// irrelevant to the dependence analysis.
|
|
MarkUnsusedDistanceEntriesAsIrrelevant(source, destination, distance_vector);
|
|
|
|
Instruction* source_access_chain = GetOperandDefinition(source, 0);
|
|
Instruction* destination_access_chain = GetOperandDefinition(destination, 0);
|
|
|
|
auto num_access_chains =
|
|
(source_access_chain->opcode() == SpvOpAccessChain) +
|
|
(destination_access_chain->opcode() == SpvOpAccessChain);
|
|
|
|
// If neither is an access chain, then they are load/store to a variable.
|
|
if (num_access_chains == 0) {
|
|
if (source_access_chain != destination_access_chain) {
|
|
// Not the same location, report independence
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Accessing the same variable
|
|
for (auto& entry : distance_vector->GetEntries()) {
|
|
entry = DistanceEntry();
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If only one is an access chain, it could be accessing a part of a struct
|
|
if (num_access_chains == 1) {
|
|
auto source_is_chain = source_access_chain->opcode() == SpvOpAccessChain;
|
|
auto access_chain =
|
|
source_is_chain ? source_access_chain : destination_access_chain;
|
|
auto variable =
|
|
source_is_chain ? destination_access_chain : source_access_chain;
|
|
|
|
auto location_in_chain = GetOperandDefinition(access_chain, 0);
|
|
|
|
if (variable != location_in_chain) {
|
|
// Not the same location, report independence
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Accessing the same variable
|
|
for (auto& entry : distance_vector->GetEntries()) {
|
|
entry = DistanceEntry();
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the access chains aren't collecting from the same structure there is no
|
|
// dependence.
|
|
Instruction* source_array = GetOperandDefinition(source_access_chain, 0);
|
|
Instruction* destination_array =
|
|
GetOperandDefinition(destination_access_chain, 0);
|
|
|
|
// Nested access chains are not supported yet, bail out.
|
|
if (source_array->opcode() == SpvOpAccessChain ||
|
|
destination_array->opcode() == SpvOpAccessChain) {
|
|
for (auto& entry : distance_vector->GetEntries()) {
|
|
entry = DistanceEntry();
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (source_array != destination_array) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence through different arrays.");
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// To handle multiple subscripts we must get every operand in the access
|
|
// chains past the first.
|
|
std::vector<Instruction*> source_subscripts = GetSubscripts(source);
|
|
std::vector<Instruction*> destination_subscripts = GetSubscripts(destination);
|
|
|
|
auto sets_of_subscripts =
|
|
PartitionSubscripts(source_subscripts, destination_subscripts);
|
|
|
|
auto first_coupled = std::partition(
|
|
std::begin(sets_of_subscripts), std::end(sets_of_subscripts),
|
|
[](const std::set<std::pair<Instruction*, Instruction*>>& set) {
|
|
return set.size() == 1;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Go through each subscript testing for independence.
|
|
// If any subscript results in independence, we prove independence between the
|
|
// load and store.
|
|
// If we can't prove independence we store what information we can gather in
|
|
// a DistanceVector.
|
|
for (auto it = std::begin(sets_of_subscripts); it < first_coupled; ++it) {
|
|
auto source_subscript = std::get<0>(*(*it).begin());
|
|
auto destination_subscript = std::get<1>(*(*it).begin());
|
|
|
|
SENode* source_node = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(source_subscript));
|
|
SENode* destination_node = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(destination_subscript));
|
|
|
|
// Check the loops are in a form we support.
|
|
auto subscript_pair = std::make_pair(source_node, destination_node);
|
|
|
|
const Loop* loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair);
|
|
if (loop) {
|
|
if (!IsSupportedLoop(loop)) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"GetDependence found an unsupported loop form. Assuming <=> for "
|
|
"loop.");
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry =
|
|
GetDistanceEntryForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair, distance_vector);
|
|
if (distance_entry) {
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
}
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If either node is simplified to a CanNotCompute we can't perform any
|
|
// analysis so must assume <=> dependence and return.
|
|
if (source_node->GetType() == SENode::CanNotCompute ||
|
|
destination_node->GetType() == SENode::CanNotCompute) {
|
|
// Record the <=> dependence if we can get a DistanceEntry
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"GetDependence found source_node || destination_node as "
|
|
"CanNotCompute. Abandoning evaluation for this subscript.");
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry =
|
|
GetDistanceEntryForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair, distance_vector);
|
|
if (distance_entry) {
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
}
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We have no induction variables so can apply a ZIV test.
|
|
if (IsZIV(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found a ZIV subscript pair");
|
|
if (ZIVTest(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with ZIVTest.");
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We have only one induction variable so should attempt an SIV test.
|
|
if (IsSIV(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found a SIV subscript pair.");
|
|
if (SIVTest(subscript_pair, distance_vector)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with SIVTest.");
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We have multiple induction variables so should attempt an MIV test.
|
|
if (IsMIV(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found a MIV subscript pair.");
|
|
if (GCDMIVTest(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with the GCD test.");
|
|
auto current_loops = CollectLoops(source_node, destination_node);
|
|
|
|
for (auto current_loop : current_loops) {
|
|
auto distance_entry =
|
|
GetDistanceEntryForLoop(current_loop, distance_vector);
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (auto it = first_coupled; it < std::end(sets_of_subscripts); ++it) {
|
|
auto coupled_instructions = *it;
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> coupled_subscripts{};
|
|
|
|
for (const auto& elem : coupled_instructions) {
|
|
auto source_subscript = std::get<0>(elem);
|
|
auto destination_subscript = std::get<1>(elem);
|
|
|
|
SENode* source_node = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(source_subscript));
|
|
SENode* destination_node = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(destination_subscript));
|
|
|
|
coupled_subscripts.push_back({source_node, destination_node});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto supported = true;
|
|
|
|
for (const auto& subscript : coupled_subscripts) {
|
|
auto loops = CollectLoops(std::get<0>(subscript), std::get<1>(subscript));
|
|
|
|
auto is_subscript_supported =
|
|
std::all_of(std::begin(loops), std::end(loops),
|
|
[this](const Loop* l) { return IsSupportedLoop(l); });
|
|
|
|
supported = supported && is_subscript_supported;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (DeltaTest(coupled_subscripts, distance_vector)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence so must gather all of the direction
|
|
// information we found.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"Couldn't prove independence.\n"
|
|
"All possible direction information has been collected in the input "
|
|
"DistanceVector.");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::ZIVTest(
|
|
const std::pair<SENode*, SENode*>& subscript_pair) {
|
|
auto source = std::get<0>(subscript_pair);
|
|
auto destination = std::get<1>(subscript_pair);
|
|
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing ZIVTest");
|
|
// If source == destination, dependence with direction = and distance 0.
|
|
if (source == destination) {
|
|
PrintDebug("ZIVTest found EQ dependence.");
|
|
return false;
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug("ZIVTest found independence.");
|
|
// Otherwise we prove independence.
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::SIVTest(
|
|
const std::pair<SENode*, SENode*>& subscript_pair,
|
|
DistanceVector* distance_vector) {
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry =
|
|
GetDistanceEntryForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair, distance_vector);
|
|
if (!distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"SIVTest could not find a DistanceEntry for subscript_pair. Exiting");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
SENode* source_node = std::get<0>(subscript_pair);
|
|
SENode* destination_node = std::get<1>(subscript_pair);
|
|
|
|
int64_t source_induction_count = CountInductionVariables(source_node);
|
|
int64_t destination_induction_count =
|
|
CountInductionVariables(destination_node);
|
|
|
|
// If the source node has no induction variables we can apply a
|
|
// WeakZeroSrcTest.
|
|
if (source_induction_count == 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found source has no induction variable.");
|
|
if (WeakZeroSourceSIVTest(
|
|
source_node, destination_node->AsSERecurrentNode(),
|
|
destination_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetCoefficient(),
|
|
distance_entry)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with WeakZeroSourceSIVTest.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the destination has no induction variables we can apply a
|
|
// WeakZeroDestTest.
|
|
if (destination_induction_count == 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found destination has no induction variable.");
|
|
if (WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest(
|
|
source_node->AsSERecurrentNode(), destination_node,
|
|
source_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetCoefficient(),
|
|
distance_entry)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We now need to collect the SERecurrentExpr nodes from source and
|
|
// destination. We do not handle cases where source or destination have
|
|
// multiple SERecurrentExpr nodes.
|
|
std::vector<SERecurrentNode*> source_recurrent_nodes =
|
|
source_node->CollectRecurrentNodes();
|
|
std::vector<SERecurrentNode*> destination_recurrent_nodes =
|
|
destination_node->CollectRecurrentNodes();
|
|
|
|
if (source_recurrent_nodes.size() == 1 &&
|
|
destination_recurrent_nodes.size() == 1) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found source and destination have 1 induction variable.");
|
|
SERecurrentNode* source_recurrent_expr = *source_recurrent_nodes.begin();
|
|
SERecurrentNode* destination_recurrent_expr =
|
|
*destination_recurrent_nodes.begin();
|
|
|
|
// If the coefficients are identical we can apply a StrongSIVTest.
|
|
if (source_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient() ==
|
|
destination_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient()) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found source and destination share coefficient.");
|
|
if (StrongSIVTest(source_node, destination_node,
|
|
source_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient(),
|
|
distance_entry)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with StrongSIVTest");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the coefficients are of equal magnitude and opposite sign we can
|
|
// apply a WeakCrossingSIVTest.
|
|
if (source_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient() ==
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
destination_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient())) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Found source coefficient = -destination coefficient.");
|
|
if (WeakCrossingSIVTest(source_node, destination_node,
|
|
source_recurrent_expr->GetCoefficient(),
|
|
distance_entry)) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Proved independence with WeakCrossingSIVTest");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::StrongSIVTest(SENode* source, SENode* destination,
|
|
SENode* coefficient,
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing StrongSIVTest.");
|
|
// If both source and destination are SERecurrentNodes we can perform tests
|
|
// based on distance.
|
|
// If either source or destination contain value unknown nodes or if one or
|
|
// both are not SERecurrentNodes we must attempt a symbolic test.
|
|
std::vector<SEValueUnknown*> source_value_unknown_nodes =
|
|
source->CollectValueUnknownNodes();
|
|
std::vector<SEValueUnknown*> destination_value_unknown_nodes =
|
|
destination->CollectValueUnknownNodes();
|
|
if (source_value_unknown_nodes.size() > 0 ||
|
|
destination_value_unknown_nodes.size() > 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest found symbolics. Will attempt SymbolicStrongSIVTest.");
|
|
return SymbolicStrongSIVTest(source, destination, coefficient,
|
|
distance_entry);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!source->AsSERecurrentNode() || !destination->AsSERecurrentNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest could not simplify source and destination to "
|
|
"SERecurrentNodes so will exit.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Build an SENode for distance.
|
|
std::pair<SENode*, SENode*> subscript_pair =
|
|
std::make_pair(source, destination);
|
|
const Loop* subscript_loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair);
|
|
SENode* source_constant_term =
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, source->AsSERecurrentNode());
|
|
SENode* destination_constant_term =
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, destination->AsSERecurrentNode());
|
|
if (!source_constant_term || !destination_constant_term) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest could not collect the constant terms of either source "
|
|
"or destination so will exit.");
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
SENode* constant_term_delta =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(
|
|
destination_constant_term, source_constant_term));
|
|
|
|
// Scalar evolution doesn't perform division, so we must fold to constants and
|
|
// do it manually.
|
|
// We must check the offset delta and coefficient are constants.
|
|
int64_t distance = 0;
|
|
SEConstantNode* delta_constant = constant_term_delta->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* coefficient_constant = coefficient->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (delta_constant && coefficient_constant) {
|
|
int64_t delta_value = delta_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t coefficient_value = coefficient_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest found delta value and coefficient value as constants "
|
|
"with values:\n"
|
|
"\tdelta value: " +
|
|
ToString(delta_value) +
|
|
"\n\tcoefficient value: " + ToString(coefficient_value) + "\n");
|
|
// Check if the distance is not integral to try to prove independence.
|
|
if (delta_value % coefficient_value != 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest proved independence through distance not being an "
|
|
"integer.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
distance = delta_value / coefficient_value;
|
|
PrintDebug("StrongSIV test found distance as " + ToString(distance));
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
// If we can't fold delta and coefficient to single values we can't produce
|
|
// distance.
|
|
// As a result we can't perform the rest of the pass and must assume
|
|
// dependence in all directions.
|
|
PrintDebug("StrongSIVTest could not produce a distance. Must exit.");
|
|
distance_entry->distance = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Next we gather the upper and lower bounds as constants if possible. If
|
|
// distance > upper_bound - lower_bound we prove independence.
|
|
SENode* lower_bound = GetLowerBound(subscript_loop);
|
|
SENode* upper_bound = GetUpperBound(subscript_loop);
|
|
if (lower_bound && upper_bound) {
|
|
PrintDebug("StrongSIVTest found bounds.");
|
|
SENode* bounds = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(upper_bound, lower_bound));
|
|
|
|
if (bounds->GetType() == SENode::SENodeType::Constant) {
|
|
int64_t bounds_value = bounds->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest found upper_bound - lower_bound as a constant with "
|
|
"value " +
|
|
ToString(bounds_value));
|
|
|
|
// If the absolute value of the distance is > upper bound - lower bound
|
|
// then we prove independence.
|
|
if (llabs(distance) > llabs(bounds_value)) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest proved independence through distance escaping the "
|
|
"loop bounds.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = distance;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug("StrongSIVTest was unable to gather lower and upper bounds.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise we can get a direction as follows
|
|
// { < if distance > 0
|
|
// direction = { = if distance == 0
|
|
// { > if distance < 0
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest could not prove independence. Gathering direction "
|
|
"information.");
|
|
if (distance > 0) {
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::LT;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = distance;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
if (distance == 0) {
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::EQ;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = 0;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
if (distance < 0) {
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::GT;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = distance;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence or discern any additional information
|
|
// Must assume <=> direction.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"StrongSIVTest was unable to determine any dependence information.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::SymbolicStrongSIVTest(
|
|
SENode* source, SENode* destination, SENode* coefficient,
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing SymbolicStrongSIVTest.");
|
|
SENode* source_destination_delta = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(source, destination));
|
|
// By cancelling out the induction variables by subtracting the source and
|
|
// destination we can produce an expression of symbolics and constants. This
|
|
// expression can be compared to the loop bounds to find if the offset is
|
|
// outwith the bounds.
|
|
std::pair<SENode*, SENode*> subscript_pair =
|
|
std::make_pair(source, destination);
|
|
const Loop* subscript_loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair);
|
|
if (IsProvablyOutsideOfLoopBounds(subscript_loop, source_destination_delta,
|
|
coefficient)) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"SymbolicStrongSIVTest proved independence through loop bounds.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence or discern any additional information.
|
|
// Must assume <=> direction.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"SymbolicStrongSIVTest was unable to determine any dependence "
|
|
"information.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::WeakZeroSourceSIVTest(
|
|
SENode* source, SERecurrentNode* destination, SENode* coefficient,
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing WeakZeroSourceSIVTest.");
|
|
std::pair<SENode*, SENode*> subscript_pair =
|
|
std::make_pair(source, destination);
|
|
const Loop* subscript_loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair);
|
|
// Build an SENode for distance.
|
|
SENode* destination_constant_term =
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, destination);
|
|
SENode* delta = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(source, destination_constant_term));
|
|
|
|
// Scalar evolution doesn't perform division, so we must fold to constants and
|
|
// do it manually.
|
|
int64_t distance = 0;
|
|
SEConstantNode* delta_constant = delta->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* coefficient_constant = coefficient->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (delta_constant && coefficient_constant) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest folding delta and coefficient to constants.");
|
|
int64_t delta_value = delta_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t coefficient_value = coefficient_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
// Check if the distance is not integral.
|
|
if (delta_value % coefficient_value != 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest proved independence through distance not "
|
|
"being an integer.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
distance = delta_value / coefficient_value;
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest calculated distance with the following "
|
|
"values\n"
|
|
"\tdelta value: " +
|
|
ToString(delta_value) +
|
|
"\n\tcoefficient value: " + ToString(coefficient_value) +
|
|
"\n\tdistance: " + ToString(distance) + "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest was unable to fold delta and coefficient to "
|
|
"constants.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we can prove the distance is outside the bounds we prove independence.
|
|
SEConstantNode* lower_bound =
|
|
GetLowerBound(subscript_loop)->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* upper_bound =
|
|
GetUpperBound(subscript_loop)->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (lower_bound && upper_bound) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroSourceSIVTest found bounds as SEConstantNodes.");
|
|
int64_t lower_bound_value = lower_bound->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t upper_bound_value = upper_bound->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
if (!IsWithinBounds(llabs(distance), lower_bound_value,
|
|
upper_bound_value)) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest proved independence through distance escaping "
|
|
"the loop bounds.");
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"Bound values were as follow\n"
|
|
"\tlower bound value: " +
|
|
ToString(lower_bound_value) +
|
|
"\n\tupper bound value: " + ToString(upper_bound_value) +
|
|
"\n\tdistance value: " + ToString(distance) + "\n");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = distance;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest was unable to find lower and upper bound as "
|
|
"SEConstantNodes.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now we want to see if we can detect to peel the first or last iterations.
|
|
|
|
// We get the FirstTripValue as GetFirstTripInductionNode() +
|
|
// GetConstantTerm(destination)
|
|
SENode* first_trip_SENode =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(
|
|
GetFirstTripInductionNode(subscript_loop),
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, destination)));
|
|
|
|
// If source == FirstTripValue, peel_first.
|
|
if (first_trip_SENode) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroSourceSIVTest built first_trip_SENode.");
|
|
if (first_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest has found first_trip_SENode as an "
|
|
"SEConstantNode with value: " +
|
|
ToString(first_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue()) +
|
|
"\n");
|
|
}
|
|
if (source == first_trip_SENode) {
|
|
// We have found that peeling the first iteration will break dependency.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest has found peeling first iteration will break "
|
|
"dependency");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::PEEL;
|
|
distance_entry->peel_first = true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroSourceSIVTest was unable to build first_trip_SENode");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We get the LastTripValue as GetFinalTripInductionNode(coefficient) +
|
|
// GetConstantTerm(destination)
|
|
SENode* final_trip_SENode =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(
|
|
GetFinalTripInductionNode(subscript_loop, coefficient),
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, destination)));
|
|
|
|
// If source == LastTripValue, peel_last.
|
|
if (final_trip_SENode) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroSourceSIVTest built final_trip_SENode.");
|
|
if (first_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest has found final_trip_SENode as an "
|
|
"SEConstantNode with value: " +
|
|
ToString(final_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue()) +
|
|
"\n");
|
|
}
|
|
if (source == final_trip_SENode) {
|
|
// We have found that peeling the last iteration will break dependency.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest has found peeling final iteration will break "
|
|
"dependency");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::PEEL;
|
|
distance_entry->peel_last = true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroSourceSIVTest was unable to build final_trip_SENode");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence or discern any additional information.
|
|
// Must assume <=> direction.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroSourceSIVTest was unable to determine any dependence "
|
|
"information.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest(
|
|
SERecurrentNode* source, SENode* destination, SENode* coefficient,
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest.");
|
|
// Build an SENode for distance.
|
|
std::pair<SENode*, SENode*> subscript_pair =
|
|
std::make_pair(source, destination);
|
|
const Loop* subscript_loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(subscript_pair);
|
|
SENode* source_constant_term = GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, source);
|
|
SENode* delta = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(destination, source_constant_term));
|
|
|
|
// Scalar evolution doesn't perform division, so we must fold to constants and
|
|
// do it manually.
|
|
int64_t distance = 0;
|
|
SEConstantNode* delta_constant = delta->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* coefficient_constant = coefficient->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (delta_constant && coefficient_constant) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest folding delta and coefficient to "
|
|
"constants.");
|
|
int64_t delta_value = delta_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t coefficient_value = coefficient_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
// Check if the distance is not integral.
|
|
if (delta_value % coefficient_value != 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest proved independence through distance not "
|
|
"being an integer.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
distance = delta_value / coefficient_value;
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest calculated distance with the following "
|
|
"values\n"
|
|
"\tdelta value: " +
|
|
ToString(delta_value) +
|
|
"\n\tcoefficient value: " + ToString(coefficient_value) +
|
|
"\n\tdistance: " + ToString(distance) + "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest was unable to fold delta and coefficient "
|
|
"to constants.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we can prove the distance is outside the bounds we prove independence.
|
|
SEConstantNode* lower_bound =
|
|
GetLowerBound(subscript_loop)->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* upper_bound =
|
|
GetUpperBound(subscript_loop)->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (lower_bound && upper_bound) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest found bounds as SEConstantNodes.");
|
|
int64_t lower_bound_value = lower_bound->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t upper_bound_value = upper_bound->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
if (!IsWithinBounds(llabs(distance), lower_bound_value,
|
|
upper_bound_value)) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest proved independence through distance "
|
|
"escaping the loop bounds.");
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"Bound values were as follows\n"
|
|
"\tlower bound value: " +
|
|
ToString(lower_bound_value) +
|
|
"\n\tupper bound value: " + ToString(upper_bound_value) +
|
|
"\n\tdistance value: " + ToString(distance));
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = distance;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest was unable to find lower and upper bound "
|
|
"as SEConstantNodes.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now we want to see if we can detect to peel the first or last iterations.
|
|
|
|
// We get the FirstTripValue as GetFirstTripInductionNode() +
|
|
// GetConstantTerm(source)
|
|
SENode* first_trip_SENode = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(GetFirstTripInductionNode(subscript_loop),
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, source)));
|
|
|
|
// If destination == FirstTripValue, peel_first.
|
|
if (first_trip_SENode) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest built first_trip_SENode.");
|
|
if (first_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest has found first_trip_SENode as an "
|
|
"SEConstantNode with value: " +
|
|
ToString(first_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue()) +
|
|
"\n");
|
|
}
|
|
if (destination == first_trip_SENode) {
|
|
// We have found that peeling the first iteration will break dependency.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest has found peeling first iteration will "
|
|
"break dependency");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::PEEL;
|
|
distance_entry->peel_first = true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest was unable to build first_trip_SENode");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We get the LastTripValue as GetFinalTripInductionNode(coefficient) +
|
|
// GetConstantTerm(source)
|
|
SENode* final_trip_SENode =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(
|
|
GetFinalTripInductionNode(subscript_loop, coefficient),
|
|
GetConstantTerm(subscript_loop, source)));
|
|
|
|
// If destination == LastTripValue, peel_last.
|
|
if (final_trip_SENode) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest built final_trip_SENode.");
|
|
if (final_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest has found final_trip_SENode as an "
|
|
"SEConstantNode with value: " +
|
|
ToString(final_trip_SENode->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue()) +
|
|
"\n");
|
|
}
|
|
if (destination == final_trip_SENode) {
|
|
// We have found that peeling the last iteration will break dependency.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest has found peeling final iteration will "
|
|
"break dependency");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::PEEL;
|
|
distance_entry->peel_last = true;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest was unable to build final_trip_SENode");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence or discern any additional information.
|
|
// Must assume <=> direction.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakZeroDestinationSIVTest was unable to determine any dependence "
|
|
"information.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::WeakCrossingSIVTest(
|
|
SENode* source, SENode* destination, SENode* coefficient,
|
|
DistanceEntry* distance_entry) {
|
|
PrintDebug("Performing WeakCrossingSIVTest.");
|
|
// We currently can't handle symbolic WeakCrossingSIVTests. If either source
|
|
// or destination are not SERecurrentNodes we must exit.
|
|
if (!source->AsSERecurrentNode() || !destination->AsSERecurrentNode()) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakCrossingSIVTest found source or destination != SERecurrentNode. "
|
|
"Exiting");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Build an SENode for distance.
|
|
SENode* offset_delta =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(
|
|
destination->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetOffset(),
|
|
source->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetOffset()));
|
|
|
|
// Scalar evolution doesn't perform division, so we must fold to constants and
|
|
// do it manually.
|
|
int64_t distance = 0;
|
|
SEConstantNode* delta_constant = offset_delta->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
SEConstantNode* coefficient_constant = coefficient->AsSEConstantNode();
|
|
if (delta_constant && coefficient_constant) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakCrossingSIVTest folding offset_delta and coefficient to "
|
|
"constants.");
|
|
int64_t delta_value = delta_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
int64_t coefficient_value = coefficient_constant->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
// Check if the distance is not integral or if it has a non-integral part
|
|
// equal to 1/2.
|
|
if (delta_value % (2 * coefficient_value) != 0 &&
|
|
static_cast<float>(delta_value % (2 * coefficient_value)) /
|
|
static_cast<float>(2 * coefficient_value) !=
|
|
0.5) {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakCrossingSIVTest proved independence through distance escaping "
|
|
"the loop bounds.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DIRECTION;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::NONE;
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else {
|
|
distance = delta_value / (2 * coefficient_value);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (distance == 0) {
|
|
PrintDebug("WeakCrossingSIVTest found EQ dependence.");
|
|
distance_entry->dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::EQ;
|
|
distance_entry->distance = 0;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakCrossingSIVTest was unable to fold offset_delta and coefficient "
|
|
"to constants.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We were unable to prove independence or discern any additional information.
|
|
// Must assume <=> direction.
|
|
PrintDebug(
|
|
"WeakCrossingSIVTest was unable to determine any dependence "
|
|
"information.");
|
|
distance_entry->direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::ALL;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Perform the GCD test if both, the source and the destination nodes, are in
|
|
// the form a0*i0 + a1*i1 + ... an*in + c.
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::GCDMIVTest(
|
|
const std::pair<SENode*, SENode*>& subscript_pair) {
|
|
auto source = std::get<0>(subscript_pair);
|
|
auto destination = std::get<1>(subscript_pair);
|
|
|
|
// Bail out if source/destination is in an unexpected form.
|
|
if (!IsInCorrectFormForGCDTest(source) ||
|
|
!IsInCorrectFormForGCDTest(destination)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
auto source_recurrences = GetAllTopLevelRecurrences(source);
|
|
auto dest_recurrences = GetAllTopLevelRecurrences(destination);
|
|
|
|
// Bail out if all offsets and coefficients aren't constant.
|
|
if (!AreOffsetsAndCoefficientsConstant(source_recurrences) ||
|
|
!AreOffsetsAndCoefficientsConstant(dest_recurrences)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Calculate the GCD of all coefficients.
|
|
auto source_constants = GetAllTopLevelConstants(source);
|
|
int64_t source_constant =
|
|
CalculateConstantTerm(source_recurrences, source_constants);
|
|
|
|
auto dest_constants = GetAllTopLevelConstants(destination);
|
|
int64_t destination_constant =
|
|
CalculateConstantTerm(dest_recurrences, dest_constants);
|
|
|
|
int64_t delta = std::abs(source_constant - destination_constant);
|
|
|
|
int64_t running_gcd = 0;
|
|
|
|
running_gcd = CalculateGCDFromCoefficients(source_recurrences, running_gcd);
|
|
running_gcd = CalculateGCDFromCoefficients(dest_recurrences, running_gcd);
|
|
|
|
return delta % running_gcd != 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
using PartitionedSubscripts =
|
|
std::vector<std::set<std::pair<Instruction*, Instruction*>>>;
|
|
PartitionedSubscripts LoopDependenceAnalysis::PartitionSubscripts(
|
|
const std::vector<Instruction*>& source_subscripts,
|
|
const std::vector<Instruction*>& destination_subscripts) {
|
|
PartitionedSubscripts partitions{};
|
|
|
|
auto num_subscripts = source_subscripts.size();
|
|
|
|
// Create initial partitions with one subscript pair per partition.
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < num_subscripts; ++i) {
|
|
partitions.push_back({{source_subscripts[i], destination_subscripts[i]}});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Iterate over the loops to create all partitions
|
|
for (auto loop : loops_) {
|
|
int64_t k = -1;
|
|
|
|
for (size_t j = 0; j < partitions.size(); ++j) {
|
|
auto& current_partition = partitions[j];
|
|
|
|
// Does |loop| appear in |current_partition|
|
|
auto it = std::find_if(
|
|
current_partition.begin(), current_partition.end(),
|
|
[loop,
|
|
this](const std::pair<Instruction*, Instruction*>& elem) -> bool {
|
|
auto source_recurrences =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(std::get<0>(elem))
|
|
->CollectRecurrentNodes();
|
|
auto destination_recurrences =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.AnalyzeInstruction(std::get<1>(elem))
|
|
->CollectRecurrentNodes();
|
|
|
|
source_recurrences.insert(source_recurrences.end(),
|
|
destination_recurrences.begin(),
|
|
destination_recurrences.end());
|
|
|
|
auto loops_in_pair = CollectLoops(source_recurrences);
|
|
auto end_it = loops_in_pair.end();
|
|
|
|
return std::find(loops_in_pair.begin(), end_it, loop) != end_it;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
auto has_loop = it != current_partition.end();
|
|
|
|
if (has_loop) {
|
|
if (k == -1) {
|
|
k = j;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Add |partitions[j]| to |partitions[k]| and discard |partitions[j]|
|
|
partitions[static_cast<size_t>(k)].insert(current_partition.begin(),
|
|
current_partition.end());
|
|
current_partition.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Remove empty (discarded) partitions
|
|
partitions.erase(
|
|
std::remove_if(
|
|
partitions.begin(), partitions.end(),
|
|
[](const std::set<std::pair<Instruction*, Instruction*>>& partition) {
|
|
return partition.empty();
|
|
}),
|
|
partitions.end());
|
|
|
|
return partitions;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Constraint* LoopDependenceAnalysis::IntersectConstraints(
|
|
Constraint* constraint_0, Constraint* constraint_1,
|
|
const SENode* lower_bound, const SENode* upper_bound) {
|
|
if (constraint_0->AsDependenceNone()) {
|
|
return constraint_1;
|
|
} else if (constraint_1->AsDependenceNone()) {
|
|
return constraint_0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both constraints are distances. Either the same distance or independent.
|
|
if (constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance() &&
|
|
constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance()) {
|
|
auto dist_0 = constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance();
|
|
auto dist_1 = constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance();
|
|
|
|
if (*dist_0->GetDistance() == *dist_1->GetDistance()) {
|
|
return constraint_0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both constraints are points. Either the same point or independent.
|
|
if (constraint_0->AsDependencePoint() && constraint_1->AsDependencePoint()) {
|
|
auto point_0 = constraint_0->AsDependencePoint();
|
|
auto point_1 = constraint_1->AsDependencePoint();
|
|
|
|
if (*point_0->GetSource() == *point_1->GetSource() &&
|
|
*point_0->GetDestination() == *point_1->GetDestination()) {
|
|
return constraint_0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both constraints are lines/distances.
|
|
if ((constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance() ||
|
|
constraint_0->AsDependenceLine()) &&
|
|
(constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance() ||
|
|
constraint_1->AsDependenceLine())) {
|
|
auto is_distance_0 = constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance() != nullptr;
|
|
auto is_distance_1 = constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance() != nullptr;
|
|
|
|
auto a0 = is_distance_0 ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(1)
|
|
: constraint_0->AsDependenceLine()->GetA();
|
|
auto b0 = is_distance_0 ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(-1)
|
|
: constraint_0->AsDependenceLine()->GetB();
|
|
auto c0 =
|
|
is_distance_0
|
|
? scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance()->GetDistance()))
|
|
: constraint_0->AsDependenceLine()->GetC();
|
|
|
|
auto a1 = is_distance_1 ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(1)
|
|
: constraint_1->AsDependenceLine()->GetA();
|
|
auto b1 = is_distance_1 ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(-1)
|
|
: constraint_1->AsDependenceLine()->GetB();
|
|
auto c1 =
|
|
is_distance_1
|
|
? scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance()->GetDistance()))
|
|
: constraint_1->AsDependenceLine()->GetC();
|
|
|
|
if (a0->AsSEConstantNode() && b0->AsSEConstantNode() &&
|
|
c0->AsSEConstantNode() && a1->AsSEConstantNode() &&
|
|
b1->AsSEConstantNode() && c1->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
auto constant_a0 = a0->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_b0 = b0->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_c0 = c0->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
|
|
auto constant_a1 = a1->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_b1 = b1->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_c1 = c1->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
|
|
// a & b can't both be zero, otherwise it wouldn't be line.
|
|
if (NormalizeAndCompareFractions(constant_a0, constant_b0, constant_a1,
|
|
constant_b1)) {
|
|
// Slopes are equal, either parallel lines or the same line.
|
|
|
|
if (constant_b0 == 0 && constant_b1 == 0) {
|
|
if (NormalizeAndCompareFractions(constant_c0, constant_a0,
|
|
constant_c1, constant_a1)) {
|
|
return constraint_0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
} else if (NormalizeAndCompareFractions(constant_c0, constant_b0,
|
|
constant_c1, constant_b1)) {
|
|
// Same line.
|
|
return constraint_0;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Parallel lines can't intersect, report independence.
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Lines are not parallel, therefore, they must intersect.
|
|
|
|
// Calculate intersection.
|
|
if (upper_bound->AsSEConstantNode() &&
|
|
lower_bound->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
auto constant_lower_bound =
|
|
lower_bound->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_upper_bound =
|
|
upper_bound->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
|
|
auto up = constant_b1 * constant_c0 - constant_b0 * constant_c1;
|
|
// Both b or both a can't be 0, so down is never 0
|
|
// otherwise would have entered the parallel line section.
|
|
auto down = constant_b1 * constant_a0 - constant_b0 * constant_a1;
|
|
|
|
auto x_coord = up / down;
|
|
|
|
int64_t y_coord = 0;
|
|
int64_t arg1 = 0;
|
|
int64_t const_b_to_use = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (constant_b1 != 0) {
|
|
arg1 = constant_c1 - constant_a1 * x_coord;
|
|
y_coord = arg1 / constant_b1;
|
|
const_b_to_use = constant_b1;
|
|
} else if (constant_b0 != 0) {
|
|
arg1 = constant_c0 - constant_a0 * x_coord;
|
|
y_coord = arg1 / constant_b0;
|
|
const_b_to_use = constant_b0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (up % down == 0 &&
|
|
arg1 % const_b_to_use == 0 && // Coordinates are integers.
|
|
constant_lower_bound <=
|
|
x_coord && // x_coord is within loop bounds.
|
|
x_coord <= constant_upper_bound &&
|
|
constant_lower_bound <=
|
|
y_coord && // y_coord is within loop bounds.
|
|
y_coord <= constant_upper_bound) {
|
|
// Lines intersect at integer coordinates.
|
|
return make_constraint<DependencePoint>(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(x_coord),
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(y_coord),
|
|
constraint_0->GetLoop());
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Not constants, bail out.
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceNone>();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Not constants, bail out.
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceNone>();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// One constraint is a line/distance and the other is a point.
|
|
if ((constraint_0->AsDependencePoint() &&
|
|
(constraint_1->AsDependenceLine() ||
|
|
constraint_1->AsDependenceDistance())) ||
|
|
(constraint_1->AsDependencePoint() &&
|
|
(constraint_0->AsDependenceLine() ||
|
|
constraint_0->AsDependenceDistance()))) {
|
|
auto point_0 = constraint_0->AsDependencePoint() != nullptr;
|
|
|
|
auto point = point_0 ? constraint_0->AsDependencePoint()
|
|
: constraint_1->AsDependencePoint();
|
|
|
|
auto line_or_distance = point_0 ? constraint_1 : constraint_0;
|
|
|
|
auto is_distance = line_or_distance->AsDependenceDistance() != nullptr;
|
|
|
|
auto a = is_distance ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(1)
|
|
: line_or_distance->AsDependenceLine()->GetA();
|
|
auto b = is_distance ? scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(-1)
|
|
: line_or_distance->AsDependenceLine()->GetB();
|
|
auto c =
|
|
is_distance
|
|
? scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
line_or_distance->AsDependenceDistance()->GetDistance()))
|
|
: line_or_distance->AsDependenceLine()->GetC();
|
|
|
|
auto x = point->GetSource();
|
|
auto y = point->GetDestination();
|
|
|
|
if (a->AsSEConstantNode() && b->AsSEConstantNode() &&
|
|
c->AsSEConstantNode() && x->AsSEConstantNode() &&
|
|
y->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
auto constant_a = a->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_b = b->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_c = c->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
|
|
auto constant_x = x->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
auto constant_y = y->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
|
|
auto left_hand_side = constant_a * constant_x + constant_b * constant_y;
|
|
|
|
if (left_hand_side == constant_c) {
|
|
// Point is on line, return point
|
|
return point_0 ? constraint_0 : constraint_1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Point not on line, report independence (empty constraint).
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceEmpty>();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Not constants, bail out.
|
|
return make_constraint<DependenceNone>();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Propagate constraints function as described in section 5 of Practical
|
|
// Dependence Testing, Goff, Kennedy, Tseng, 1991.
|
|
SubscriptPair LoopDependenceAnalysis::PropagateConstraints(
|
|
const SubscriptPair& subscript_pair,
|
|
const std::vector<Constraint*>& constraints) {
|
|
SENode* new_first = subscript_pair.first;
|
|
SENode* new_second = subscript_pair.second;
|
|
|
|
for (auto& constraint : constraints) {
|
|
// In the paper this is a[k]. We're extracting the coefficient ('a') of a
|
|
// recurrent expression with respect to the loop 'k'.
|
|
SENode* coefficient_of_recurrent =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.GetCoefficientFromRecurrentTerm(
|
|
new_first, constraint->GetLoop());
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is a'[k].
|
|
SENode* coefficient_of_recurrent_prime =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.GetCoefficientFromRecurrentTerm(
|
|
new_second, constraint->GetLoop());
|
|
|
|
if (constraint->GetType() == Constraint::Distance) {
|
|
DependenceDistance* as_distance = constraint->AsDependenceDistance();
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is a[k]*d
|
|
SENode* rhs = scalar_evolution_.CreateMultiplyNode(
|
|
coefficient_of_recurrent, as_distance->GetDistance());
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is a[k] <- 0
|
|
SENode* zeroed_coefficient =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.BuildGraphWithoutRecurrentTerm(
|
|
new_first, constraint->GetLoop());
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is e <- e - a[k]*d.
|
|
new_first = scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(zeroed_coefficient, rhs);
|
|
new_first = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(new_first);
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is a'[k] - a[k].
|
|
SENode* new_child = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(
|
|
scalar_evolution_.CreateSubtraction(coefficient_of_recurrent_prime,
|
|
coefficient_of_recurrent));
|
|
|
|
// In the paper this is a'[k]'i[k].
|
|
SERecurrentNode* prime_recurrent =
|
|
scalar_evolution_.GetRecurrentTerm(new_second, constraint->GetLoop());
|
|
|
|
if (!prime_recurrent) continue;
|
|
|
|
// As we hash the nodes we need to create a new node when we update a
|
|
// child.
|
|
SENode* new_recurrent = scalar_evolution_.CreateRecurrentExpression(
|
|
constraint->GetLoop(), prime_recurrent->GetOffset(), new_child);
|
|
// In the paper this is a'[k] <- a'[k] - a[k].
|
|
new_second = scalar_evolution_.UpdateChildNode(
|
|
new_second, prime_recurrent, new_recurrent);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
new_second = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(new_second);
|
|
return std::make_pair(new_first, new_second);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool LoopDependenceAnalysis::DeltaTest(
|
|
const std::vector<SubscriptPair>& coupled_subscripts,
|
|
DistanceVector* dv_entry) {
|
|
std::vector<Constraint*> constraints(loops_.size());
|
|
|
|
std::vector<bool> loop_appeared(loops_.size());
|
|
|
|
std::generate(std::begin(constraints), std::end(constraints),
|
|
[this]() { return make_constraint<DependenceNone>(); });
|
|
|
|
// Separate SIV and MIV subscripts
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> siv_subscripts{};
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> miv_subscripts{};
|
|
|
|
for (const auto& subscript_pair : coupled_subscripts) {
|
|
if (IsSIV(subscript_pair)) {
|
|
siv_subscripts.push_back(subscript_pair);
|
|
} else {
|
|
miv_subscripts.push_back(subscript_pair);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Delta Test
|
|
while (!siv_subscripts.empty()) {
|
|
std::vector<bool> results(siv_subscripts.size());
|
|
|
|
std::vector<DistanceVector> current_distances(
|
|
siv_subscripts.size(), DistanceVector(loops_.size()));
|
|
|
|
// Apply SIV test to all SIV subscripts, report independence if any of them
|
|
// is independent
|
|
std::transform(
|
|
std::begin(siv_subscripts), std::end(siv_subscripts),
|
|
std::begin(current_distances), std::begin(results),
|
|
[this](SubscriptPair& p, DistanceVector& d) { return SIVTest(p, &d); });
|
|
|
|
if (std::accumulate(std::begin(results), std::end(results), false,
|
|
std::logical_or<bool>{})) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Derive new constraint vector.
|
|
std::vector<std::pair<Constraint*, size_t>> all_new_constrants{};
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < siv_subscripts.size(); ++i) {
|
|
auto loop = GetLoopForSubscriptPair(siv_subscripts[i]);
|
|
|
|
auto loop_id =
|
|
std::distance(std::begin(loops_),
|
|
std::find(std::begin(loops_), std::end(loops_), loop));
|
|
|
|
loop_appeared[loop_id] = true;
|
|
auto distance_entry = current_distances[i].GetEntries()[loop_id];
|
|
|
|
if (distance_entry.dependence_information ==
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE) {
|
|
// Construct a DependenceDistance.
|
|
auto node = scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(distance_entry.distance);
|
|
|
|
all_new_constrants.push_back(
|
|
{make_constraint<DependenceDistance>(node, loop), loop_id});
|
|
} else {
|
|
// Construct a DependenceLine.
|
|
const auto& subscript_pair = siv_subscripts[i];
|
|
SENode* source_node = std::get<0>(subscript_pair);
|
|
SENode* destination_node = std::get<1>(subscript_pair);
|
|
|
|
int64_t source_induction_count = CountInductionVariables(source_node);
|
|
int64_t destination_induction_count =
|
|
CountInductionVariables(destination_node);
|
|
|
|
SENode* a = nullptr;
|
|
SENode* b = nullptr;
|
|
SENode* c = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
if (destination_induction_count != 0) {
|
|
a = destination_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetCoefficient();
|
|
c = scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
destination_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetOffset());
|
|
} else {
|
|
a = scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(0);
|
|
c = scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(destination_node);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (source_induction_count != 0) {
|
|
b = scalar_evolution_.CreateNegation(
|
|
source_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetCoefficient());
|
|
c = scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(
|
|
c, source_node->AsSERecurrentNode()->GetOffset());
|
|
} else {
|
|
b = scalar_evolution_.CreateConstant(0);
|
|
c = scalar_evolution_.CreateAddNode(c, source_node);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
a = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(a);
|
|
b = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(b);
|
|
c = scalar_evolution_.SimplifyExpression(c);
|
|
|
|
all_new_constrants.push_back(
|
|
{make_constraint<DependenceLine>(a, b, c, loop), loop_id});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Calculate the intersection between the new and existing constraints.
|
|
std::vector<Constraint*> intersection = constraints;
|
|
for (const auto& constraint_to_intersect : all_new_constrants) {
|
|
auto loop_id = std::get<1>(constraint_to_intersect);
|
|
auto loop = loops_[loop_id];
|
|
intersection[loop_id] = IntersectConstraints(
|
|
intersection[loop_id], std::get<0>(constraint_to_intersect),
|
|
GetLowerBound(loop), GetUpperBound(loop));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Report independence if an empty constraint (DependenceEmpty) is found.
|
|
auto first_empty =
|
|
std::find_if(std::begin(intersection), std::end(intersection),
|
|
[](Constraint* constraint) {
|
|
return constraint->AsDependenceEmpty() != nullptr;
|
|
});
|
|
if (first_empty != std::end(intersection)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> new_siv_subscripts{};
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> new_miv_subscripts{};
|
|
|
|
auto equal =
|
|
std::equal(std::begin(constraints), std::end(constraints),
|
|
std::begin(intersection),
|
|
[](Constraint* a, Constraint* b) { return *a == *b; });
|
|
|
|
// If any constraints have changed, propagate them into the rest of the
|
|
// subscripts possibly creating new ZIV/SIV subscripts.
|
|
if (!equal) {
|
|
std::vector<SubscriptPair> new_subscripts(miv_subscripts.size());
|
|
|
|
// Propagate constraints into MIV subscripts
|
|
std::transform(std::begin(miv_subscripts), std::end(miv_subscripts),
|
|
std::begin(new_subscripts),
|
|
[this, &intersection](SubscriptPair& subscript_pair) {
|
|
return PropagateConstraints(subscript_pair,
|
|
intersection);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// If a ZIV subscript is returned, apply test, otherwise, update untested
|
|
// subscripts.
|
|
for (auto& subscript : new_subscripts) {
|
|
if (IsZIV(subscript) && ZIVTest(subscript)) {
|
|
return true;
|
|
} else if (IsSIV(subscript)) {
|
|
new_siv_subscripts.push_back(subscript);
|
|
} else {
|
|
new_miv_subscripts.push_back(subscript);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Set new constraints and subscripts to test.
|
|
std::swap(siv_subscripts, new_siv_subscripts);
|
|
std::swap(miv_subscripts, new_miv_subscripts);
|
|
std::swap(constraints, intersection);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Create the dependence vector from the constraints.
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < loops_.size(); ++i) {
|
|
// Don't touch entries for loops that weren't tested.
|
|
if (loop_appeared[i]) {
|
|
auto current_constraint = constraints[i];
|
|
auto& current_distance_entry = (*dv_entry).GetEntries()[i];
|
|
|
|
if (auto dependence_distance =
|
|
current_constraint->AsDependenceDistance()) {
|
|
if (auto constant_node =
|
|
dependence_distance->GetDistance()->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
current_distance_entry.dependence_information =
|
|
DistanceEntry::DependenceInformation::DISTANCE;
|
|
|
|
current_distance_entry.distance = constant_node->FoldToSingleValue();
|
|
if (current_distance_entry.distance == 0) {
|
|
current_distance_entry.direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::EQ;
|
|
} else if (current_distance_entry.distance < 0) {
|
|
current_distance_entry.direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::GT;
|
|
} else {
|
|
current_distance_entry.direction = DistanceEntry::Directions::LT;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} else if (auto dependence_point =
|
|
current_constraint->AsDependencePoint()) {
|
|
auto source = dependence_point->GetSource();
|
|
auto destination = dependence_point->GetDestination();
|
|
|
|
if (source->AsSEConstantNode() && destination->AsSEConstantNode()) {
|
|
current_distance_entry = DistanceEntry(
|
|
source->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue(),
|
|
destination->AsSEConstantNode()->FoldToSingleValue());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test any remaining MIV subscripts and report independence if found.
|
|
std::vector<bool> results(miv_subscripts.size());
|
|
|
|
std::transform(std::begin(miv_subscripts), std::end(miv_subscripts),
|
|
std::begin(results),
|
|
[this](const SubscriptPair& p) { return GCDMIVTest(p); });
|
|
|
|
return std::accumulate(std::begin(results), std::end(results), false,
|
|
std::logical_or<bool>{});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace opt
|
|
} // namespace spvtools
|