SPIRV-Tools/source/fuzz/fuzzer_pass_add_access_chains.cpp
Alastair Donaldson 8d4261bc44
spirv-fuzz: Introduce TransformationContext (#3272)
Some transformations (e.g. TransformationAddFunction) rely on running
the validator to decide whether the transformation is applicable.  A
recent change allowed spirv-fuzz to take validator options, to cater
for the case where a module should be considered valid under
particular conditions.  However, validation during the checking of
transformations had no access to these validator options.

This change introduced TransformationContext, which currently consists
of a fact manager and a set of validator options, but could in the
future have other fields corresponding to other objects that it is
useful to have access to when applying transformations.  Now, instead
of checking and applying transformations in the context of a
FactManager, a TransformationContext is used.  This gives access to
the fact manager as before, and also access to the validator options
when they are needed.
2020-04-02 15:54:46 +01:00

171 lines
7.1 KiB
C++

// Copyright (c) 2020 Google LLC
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
#include "source/fuzz/fuzzer_pass_add_access_chains.h"
#include "source/fuzz/fuzzer_util.h"
#include "source/fuzz/transformation_access_chain.h"
namespace spvtools {
namespace fuzz {
FuzzerPassAddAccessChains::FuzzerPassAddAccessChains(
opt::IRContext* ir_context, TransformationContext* transformation_context,
FuzzerContext* fuzzer_context,
protobufs::TransformationSequence* transformations)
: FuzzerPass(ir_context, transformation_context, fuzzer_context,
transformations) {}
FuzzerPassAddAccessChains::~FuzzerPassAddAccessChains() = default;
void FuzzerPassAddAccessChains::Apply() {
ForEachInstructionWithInstructionDescriptor(
[this](opt::Function* function, opt::BasicBlock* block,
opt::BasicBlock::iterator inst_it,
const protobufs::InstructionDescriptor& instruction_descriptor)
-> void {
assert(inst_it->opcode() ==
instruction_descriptor.target_instruction_opcode() &&
"The opcode of the instruction we might insert before must be "
"the same as the opcode in the descriptor for the instruction");
// Check whether it is legitimate to insert an access chain
// instruction before this instruction.
if (!fuzzerutil::CanInsertOpcodeBeforeInstruction(SpvOpAccessChain,
inst_it)) {
return;
}
// Randomly decide whether to try inserting a load here.
if (!GetFuzzerContext()->ChoosePercentage(
GetFuzzerContext()->GetChanceOfAddingAccessChain())) {
return;
}
// Get all of the pointers that are currently in scope, excluding
// explicitly null and undefined pointers.
std::vector<opt::Instruction*> relevant_pointer_instructions =
FindAvailableInstructions(
function, block, inst_it,
[](opt::IRContext* context,
opt::Instruction* instruction) -> bool {
if (!instruction->result_id() || !instruction->type_id()) {
// A pointer needs both a result and type id.
return false;
}
switch (instruction->opcode()) {
case SpvOpConstantNull:
case SpvOpUndef:
// Do not allow making an access chain from a null or
// undefined pointer. (We can eliminate these cases
// before actually checking that the instruction is a
// pointer.)
return false;
default:
break;
}
// If the instruction has pointer type, we can legitimately
// make an access chain from it.
return context->get_def_use_mgr()
->GetDef(instruction->type_id())
->opcode() == SpvOpTypePointer;
});
// At this point, |relevant_instructions| contains all the pointers
// we might think of making an access chain from.
if (relevant_pointer_instructions.empty()) {
return;
}
auto chosen_pointer =
relevant_pointer_instructions[GetFuzzerContext()->RandomIndex(
relevant_pointer_instructions)];
std::vector<uint32_t> index_ids;
auto pointer_type = GetIRContext()->get_def_use_mgr()->GetDef(
chosen_pointer->type_id());
uint32_t subobject_type_id = pointer_type->GetSingleWordInOperand(1);
while (true) {
auto subobject_type =
GetIRContext()->get_def_use_mgr()->GetDef(subobject_type_id);
if (!spvOpcodeIsComposite(subobject_type->opcode())) {
break;
}
if (!GetFuzzerContext()->ChoosePercentage(
GetFuzzerContext()
->GetChanceOfGoingDeeperWhenMakingAccessChain())) {
break;
}
uint32_t bound;
switch (subobject_type->opcode()) {
case SpvOpTypeArray:
bound = fuzzerutil::GetArraySize(*subobject_type, GetIRContext());
break;
case SpvOpTypeMatrix:
case SpvOpTypeVector:
bound = subobject_type->GetSingleWordInOperand(1);
break;
case SpvOpTypeStruct:
bound = fuzzerutil::GetNumberOfStructMembers(*subobject_type);
break;
default:
assert(false && "Not a composite type opcode.");
// Set the bound to a value in order to keep release compilers
// happy.
bound = 0;
break;
}
if (bound == 0) {
// It is possible for a composite type to legitimately have zero
// sub-components, at least in the case of a struct, which
// can have no fields.
break;
}
// TODO(https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/3179) We
// could allow non-constant indices when looking up non-structs,
// using clamping to ensure they are in-bounds.
uint32_t index_value =
GetFuzzerContext()->GetRandomIndexForAccessChain(bound);
index_ids.push_back(FindOrCreate32BitIntegerConstant(
index_value, GetFuzzerContext()->ChooseEven()));
switch (subobject_type->opcode()) {
case SpvOpTypeArray:
case SpvOpTypeMatrix:
case SpvOpTypeVector:
subobject_type_id = subobject_type->GetSingleWordInOperand(0);
break;
case SpvOpTypeStruct:
subobject_type_id =
subobject_type->GetSingleWordInOperand(index_value);
break;
default:
assert(false && "Not a composite type opcode.");
}
}
// The transformation we are about to create will only apply if a
// pointer suitable for the access chain's result type exists, so we
// create one if it does not.
FindOrCreatePointerType(subobject_type_id,
static_cast<SpvStorageClass>(
pointer_type->GetSingleWordInOperand(0)));
// Apply the transformation to add an access chain.
ApplyTransformation(TransformationAccessChain(
GetFuzzerContext()->GetFreshId(), chosen_pointer->result_id(),
index_ids, instruction_descriptor));
});
}
} // namespace fuzz
} // namespace spvtools