mirror of
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools
synced 2024-11-30 06:50:06 +00:00
8d4261bc44
Some transformations (e.g. TransformationAddFunction) rely on running the validator to decide whether the transformation is applicable. A recent change allowed spirv-fuzz to take validator options, to cater for the case where a module should be considered valid under particular conditions. However, validation during the checking of transformations had no access to these validator options. This change introduced TransformationContext, which currently consists of a fact manager and a set of validator options, but could in the future have other fields corresponding to other objects that it is useful to have access to when applying transformations. Now, instead of checking and applying transformations in the context of a FactManager, a TransformationContext is used. This gives access to the fact manager as before, and also access to the validator options when they are needed.
211 lines
8.1 KiB
C++
211 lines
8.1 KiB
C++
// Copyright (c) 2019 Google LLC
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
#include "source/fuzz/transformation_add_dead_break.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "source/fuzz/fuzzer_util.h"
|
|
#include "source/fuzz/transformation_context.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/basic_block.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/ir_context.h"
|
|
#include "source/opt/struct_cfg_analysis.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace spvtools {
|
|
namespace fuzz {
|
|
|
|
TransformationAddDeadBreak::TransformationAddDeadBreak(
|
|
const spvtools::fuzz::protobufs::TransformationAddDeadBreak& message)
|
|
: message_(message) {}
|
|
|
|
TransformationAddDeadBreak::TransformationAddDeadBreak(
|
|
uint32_t from_block, uint32_t to_block, bool break_condition_value,
|
|
std::vector<uint32_t> phi_id) {
|
|
message_.set_from_block(from_block);
|
|
message_.set_to_block(to_block);
|
|
message_.set_break_condition_value(break_condition_value);
|
|
for (auto id : phi_id) {
|
|
message_.add_phi_id(id);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool TransformationAddDeadBreak::AddingBreakRespectsStructuredControlFlow(
|
|
opt::IRContext* ir_context, opt::BasicBlock* bb_from) const {
|
|
// Look at the structured control flow associated with |from_block| and
|
|
// check whether it is contained in an appropriate construct with merge id
|
|
// |to_block| such that a break from |from_block| to |to_block| is legal.
|
|
|
|
// There are three legal cases to consider:
|
|
// (1) |from_block| is a loop header and |to_block| is its merge
|
|
// (2) |from_block| is a non-header node of a construct, and |to_block|
|
|
// is the merge for that construct
|
|
// (3) |from_block| is a non-header node of a selection construct, and
|
|
// |to_block| is the merge for the innermost loop containing
|
|
// |from_block|
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/2653) It may be
|
|
// possible to be more aggressive in breaking from switch constructs.
|
|
//
|
|
// The reason we need to distinguish between cases (1) and (2) is that the
|
|
// structured CFG analysis does not deem a header to be part of the construct
|
|
// that it heads.
|
|
|
|
// Consider case (1)
|
|
if (bb_from->IsLoopHeader()) {
|
|
// Case (1) holds if |to_block| is the merge block for the loop;
|
|
// otherwise no case holds
|
|
return bb_from->MergeBlockId() == message_.to_block();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Both cases (2) and (3) require that |from_block| is inside some
|
|
// structured control flow construct.
|
|
|
|
auto containing_construct =
|
|
ir_context->GetStructuredCFGAnalysis()->ContainingConstruct(
|
|
message_.from_block());
|
|
if (!containing_construct) {
|
|
// |from_block| is not in a construct from which we can break.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Consider case (2)
|
|
if (message_.to_block() ==
|
|
ir_context->cfg()->block(containing_construct)->MergeBlockId()) {
|
|
// This looks like an instance of case (2).
|
|
// However, the structured CFG analysis regards the continue construct of a
|
|
// loop as part of the loop, but it is not legal to jump from a loop's
|
|
// continue construct to the loop's merge (except from the back-edge block),
|
|
// so we need to check for this case.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/issues/2577): We do not
|
|
// currently allow a dead break from a back edge block, but we could and
|
|
// ultimately should.
|
|
return !fuzzerutil::BlockIsInLoopContinueConstruct(
|
|
ir_context, message_.from_block(), containing_construct);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Case (3) holds if and only if |to_block| is the merge block for this
|
|
// innermost loop that contains |from_block|
|
|
auto containing_loop_header =
|
|
ir_context->GetStructuredCFGAnalysis()->ContainingLoop(
|
|
message_.from_block());
|
|
if (containing_loop_header &&
|
|
message_.to_block() ==
|
|
ir_context->cfg()->block(containing_loop_header)->MergeBlockId()) {
|
|
return !fuzzerutil::BlockIsInLoopContinueConstruct(
|
|
ir_context, message_.from_block(), containing_loop_header);
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool TransformationAddDeadBreak::IsApplicable(
|
|
opt::IRContext* ir_context,
|
|
const TransformationContext& transformation_context) const {
|
|
// First, we check that a constant with the same value as
|
|
// |message_.break_condition_value| is present.
|
|
if (!fuzzerutil::MaybeGetBoolConstantId(ir_context,
|
|
message_.break_condition_value())) {
|
|
// The required constant is not present, so the transformation cannot be
|
|
// applied.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that |message_.from_block| and |message_.to_block| really are block
|
|
// ids
|
|
opt::BasicBlock* bb_from =
|
|
fuzzerutil::MaybeFindBlock(ir_context, message_.from_block());
|
|
if (bb_from == nullptr) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
opt::BasicBlock* bb_to =
|
|
fuzzerutil::MaybeFindBlock(ir_context, message_.to_block());
|
|
if (bb_to == nullptr) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!fuzzerutil::BlockIsReachableInItsFunction(ir_context, bb_to)) {
|
|
// If the target of the break is unreachable, we conservatively do not
|
|
// allow adding a dead break, to avoid the compilations that arise due to
|
|
// the lack of sensible dominance information for unreachable blocks.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that |message_.from_block| ends with an unconditional branch.
|
|
if (bb_from->terminator()->opcode() != SpvOpBranch) {
|
|
// The block associated with the id does not end with an unconditional
|
|
// branch.
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert(bb_from != nullptr &&
|
|
"We should have found a block if this line of code is reached.");
|
|
assert(
|
|
bb_from->id() == message_.from_block() &&
|
|
"The id of the block we found should match the source id for the break.");
|
|
assert(bb_to != nullptr &&
|
|
"We should have found a block if this line of code is reached.");
|
|
assert(
|
|
bb_to->id() == message_.to_block() &&
|
|
"The id of the block we found should match the target id for the break.");
|
|
|
|
// Check whether the data passed to extend OpPhi instructions is appropriate.
|
|
if (!fuzzerutil::PhiIdsOkForNewEdge(ir_context, bb_from, bb_to,
|
|
message_.phi_id())) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that adding the break would respect the rules of structured
|
|
// control flow.
|
|
if (!AddingBreakRespectsStructuredControlFlow(ir_context, bb_from)) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Adding the dead break is only valid if SPIR-V rules related to dominance
|
|
// hold. Rather than checking these rules explicitly, we defer to the
|
|
// validator. We make a clone of the module, apply the transformation to the
|
|
// clone, and check whether the transformed clone is valid.
|
|
//
|
|
// In principle some of the above checks could be removed, with more reliance
|
|
// being places on the validator. This should be revisited if we are sure
|
|
// the validator is complete with respect to checking structured control flow
|
|
// rules.
|
|
auto cloned_context = fuzzerutil::CloneIRContext(ir_context);
|
|
ApplyImpl(cloned_context.get());
|
|
return fuzzerutil::IsValid(cloned_context.get(),
|
|
transformation_context.GetValidatorOptions());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void TransformationAddDeadBreak::Apply(
|
|
opt::IRContext* ir_context, TransformationContext* /*unused*/) const {
|
|
ApplyImpl(ir_context);
|
|
// Invalidate all analyses
|
|
ir_context->InvalidateAnalysesExceptFor(
|
|
opt::IRContext::Analysis::kAnalysisNone);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
protobufs::Transformation TransformationAddDeadBreak::ToMessage() const {
|
|
protobufs::Transformation result;
|
|
*result.mutable_add_dead_break() = message_;
|
|
return result;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void TransformationAddDeadBreak::ApplyImpl(
|
|
spvtools::opt::IRContext* ir_context) const {
|
|
fuzzerutil::AddUnreachableEdgeAndUpdateOpPhis(
|
|
ir_context, ir_context->cfg()->block(message_.from_block()),
|
|
ir_context->cfg()->block(message_.to_block()),
|
|
message_.break_condition_value(), message_.phi_id());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace fuzz
|
|
} // namespace spvtools
|