diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index fda83726..32fdd8e2 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ As you can see boost::format is much slower than the alternative methods; this is confirmed by `other tests `_. Tinyformat is quite good coming close to IOStreams. Unfortunately tinyformat cannot be faster than the IOStreams because it uses them internally. -Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf. cppformat is [faster on -integer formatting](http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html), +Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf. cppformat is +[faster on integer formatting](http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html), but slower on floating-point formatting which dominates this benchmark. Compile time and code bloat