From 01b00e6dfbf2d427725e4bee6f2d530ef0f8a87a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Victor Zverovich Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:34:03 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.rst --- README.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index fda83726..32fdd8e2 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ As you can see boost::format is much slower than the alternative methods; this is confirmed by `other tests `_. Tinyformat is quite good coming close to IOStreams. Unfortunately tinyformat cannot be faster than the IOStreams because it uses them internally. -Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf. cppformat is [faster on -integer formatting](http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html), +Performance of cppformat is close to that of printf. cppformat is +[faster on integer formatting](http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html), but slower on floating-point formatting which dominates this benchmark. Compile time and code bloat