AuroraMiddleware/fmt
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt.git synced 2024-11-29 13:21:05 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update benchmark results.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Victor Zverovich 2014-05-23 08:58:28 -07:00
parent 23eb9b4f4c
commit 60cd838f1c
1 changed files with 22 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

47
README.rst
View File

@ -271,34 +271,31 @@ best of three) is shown in the following tables.
**Optimized build (-O3)**
====================== ================== ==========================
test name total compile time executable size (stripped)
====================== ================== ==========================
libc printf 2.5s 42K (31K)
IOStreams 19.8s 86K (64K)
C++ Format 48.8s 103K (84K)
tinyformat 65.0s 428K (396K)
Boost Format 212.0s 1014K (945K)
====================== ================== ==========================
============ =============== ==================== ==================
Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
============ =============== ==================== ==================
printf 2.6 41 30
IOStreams 19.4 92 70
C++ Format 46.8 46 34
tinyformat 64.6 418 386
Boost Format 222.8 990 923
============ =============== ==================== ==================
As you can see, C++ Format has 80% less overhead in terms of resulting
code size compared to IOStreams and comes pretty close to ``printf``.
Boost Format has by far the largest overheads.
**Non-optimized build**
====================== ================== ==========================
test name total compile time executable size (stripped)
====================== ================== ==========================
libc printf 2.1s 42K (31K)
IOStreams 17.3s 84K (60K)
C++ Format 42.7s 167K (138K)
tinyformat 25.1s 239K (195K)
Boost Format 110.2s 905K (781K)
====================== ================== ==========================
IOStreams and printf win here which is not surprising considering that
they are included in the standard library. Tinyformat produces somewhat
larger executable sizes compared to C++ Format. Interestingly optimized
compile time is smaller for C++ Format than for tinyformat and its the
other way around with non-optimized build. Boost Format has by far the
largest overheads.
============ =============== ==================== ==================
Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
============ =============== ==================== ==================
printf 2.1 41 30
IOStreams 19.7 86 62
C++ Format 47.9 108 86
tinyformat 27.7 234 190
Boost Format 122.6 884 763
============ =============== ==================== ==================
``libc``, ``libstdc++`` and ``libformat`` are all linked as shared
libraries to compare formatting function overhead only. Boost Format