Update test results
This commit is contained in:
parent
534bff7d31
commit
39bc319b35
39
README.rst
39
README.rst
@ -298,11 +298,12 @@ further details see the `source
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
Library Method Run Time, s
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
EGLIBC 2.19 printf 1.30
|
||||
libstdc++ 4.8.2 std::ostream 1.85
|
||||
fmt 1.0 fmt::print 1.42
|
||||
tinyformat 2.0.1 tfm::printf 2.25
|
||||
Boost Format 1.54 boost::format 9.94
|
||||
libc printf 1.35
|
||||
libc++ std::ostream 3.42
|
||||
fmt 534bff7 fmt::print 1.56
|
||||
tinyformat 2.0.1 tfm::printf 3.73
|
||||
Boost Format 1.54 boost::format 8.44
|
||||
Folly Format folly::format 2.54
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see ``boost::format`` is much slower than the alternative methods; this
|
||||
@ -322,19 +323,20 @@ from `format-benchmark <https://github.com/fmtlib/format-benchmark>`_
|
||||
tests compile time and code bloat for nontrivial projects.
|
||||
It generates 100 translation units and uses ``printf()`` or its alternative
|
||||
five times in each to simulate a medium sized project. The resulting
|
||||
executable size and compile time (g++-4.8.1, Ubuntu GNU/Linux 13.10,
|
||||
best of three) is shown in the following tables.
|
||||
executable size and compile time (Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.42),
|
||||
macOS Sierra, best of three) is shown in the following tables.
|
||||
|
||||
**Optimized build (-O3)**
|
||||
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
printf 2.6 41 30
|
||||
IOStreams 19.4 92 70
|
||||
fmt 46.8 46 34
|
||||
tinyformat 64.6 418 386
|
||||
Boost Format 222.8 990 923
|
||||
printf 2.3 29 26
|
||||
IOStreams 26.9 59 55
|
||||
fmt 38.0 37 34
|
||||
tinyformat 42.5 104 98
|
||||
Boost Format 112.2 774 751
|
||||
Folly Format 152.3 104 87
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see, fmt has two times less overhead in terms of resulting
|
||||
@ -346,14 +348,15 @@ Boost Format has by far the largest overheads.
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
printf 2.1 41 30
|
||||
IOStreams 19.7 86 62
|
||||
fmt 47.9 108 86
|
||||
tinyformat 27.7 234 190
|
||||
Boost Format 122.6 884 763
|
||||
printf 2.0 33 30
|
||||
IOStreams 25.4 56 52
|
||||
fmt 37.0 57 51
|
||||
tinyformat 30.2 88 82
|
||||
Boost Format 54.0 364 302
|
||||
Folly Format 107.1 438 424
|
||||
============ =============== ==================== ==================
|
||||
|
||||
``libc``, ``libstdc++`` and ``libfmt`` are all linked as shared
|
||||
``libc``, ``lib(std)c++`` and ``libfmt`` are all linked as shared
|
||||
libraries to compare formatting function overhead only. Boost Format
|
||||
and tinyformat are header-only libraries so they don't provide any
|
||||
linkage options.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user