AuroraMiddleware/fmtlegacy
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Update README.rst

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Victor Zverovich 2016-04-25 06:36:26 -07:00
parent f1cd5413e9
commit 4cddbfa7cf
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
README.rst
View File

@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Arguments can be accessed by position and arguments' indices can be repeated:
std::string s = fmt::format("{0}{1}{0}", "abra", "cad");
// s == "abracadabra"
C++ Format can be used as a safe portable replacement for ``itoa``:
fmt can be used as a safe portable replacement for ``itoa``:
.. code:: c++
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ Library Method Run Time, s
================= ============= ===========
EGLIBC 2.19 printf 1.30
libstdc++ 4.8.2 std::ostream 1.85
C++ Format 1.0 fmt::print 1.42
fmt 1.0 fmt::print 1.42
tinyformat 2.0.1 tfm::printf 2.25
Boost Format 1.54 boost::format 9.94
================= ============= ===========
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ As you can see ``boost::format`` is much slower than the alternative methods; th
is confirmed by `other tests <http://accu.org/index.php/journals/1539>`_.
Tinyformat is quite good coming close to IOStreams. Unfortunately tinyformat
cannot be faster than the IOStreams because it uses them internally.
Performance of **fmt** is close to that of printf, being `faster than printf on integer
Performance of fmt is close to that of printf, being `faster than printf on integer
formatting <http://zverovich.net/2013/09/07/integer-to-string-conversion-in-cplusplus.html>`_,
but slower on floating-point formatting which dominates this benchmark.
@ -320,12 +320,12 @@ Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
============ =============== ==================== ==================
printf 2.6 41 30
IOStreams 19.4 92 70
C++ Format 46.8 46 34
fmt 46.8 46 34
tinyformat 64.6 418 386
Boost Format 222.8 990 923
============ =============== ==================== ==================
As you can see, C++ Format has two times less overhead in terms of resulting
As you can see, fmt has two times less overhead in terms of resulting
code size compared to IOStreams and comes pretty close to ``printf``.
Boost Format has by far the largest overheads.
@ -336,12 +336,12 @@ Method Compile Time, s Executable size, KiB Stripped size, KiB
============ =============== ==================== ==================
printf 2.1 41 30
IOStreams 19.7 86 62
C++ Format 47.9 108 86
fmt 47.9 108 86
tinyformat 27.7 234 190
Boost Format 122.6 884 763
============ =============== ==================== ==================
``libc``, ``libstdc++`` and ``libformat`` are all linked as shared
``libc``, ``libstdc++`` and ``libfmt`` are all linked as shared
libraries to compare formatting function overhead only. Boost Format
and tinyformat are header-only libraries so they don't provide any
linkage options.
@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ or the bloat test::
License
-------
C++ Format is distributed under the BSD `license
fmt is distributed under the BSD `license
<https://github.com/cppformat/cppformat/blob/master/LICENSE.rst>`_.
The `Format String Syntax
@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ adapted for the current library. For this reason the documentation is
distributed under the Python Software Foundation license available in
`doc/python-license.txt
<https://raw.github.com/cppformat/cppformat/master/doc/python-license.txt>`_.
It only applies if you distribute the documentation of C++ Format.
It only applies if you distribute the documentation of fmt.
Acknowledgments
---------------