Update README.rst
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ab80aa92c
commit
5916ff63c4
@ -164,9 +164,9 @@ Speed tests
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
Library Method Run Time, s
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
libc printf 1.03
|
||||
libc++ std::ostream 2.98
|
||||
{fmt} 4de41a fmt::print 0.76
|
||||
libc printf 1.04
|
||||
libc++ std::ostream 3.05
|
||||
{fmt} 6.1.1 fmt::print 0.75
|
||||
Boost Format 1.67 boost::format 7.24
|
||||
Folly Format folly::format 2.23
|
||||
================= ============= ===========
|
||||
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Folly Format folly::format 2.23
|
||||
{fmt} is the fastest of the benchmarked methods, ~35% faster than ``printf``.
|
||||
|
||||
The above results were generated by building ``tinyformat_test.cpp`` on macOS
|
||||
10.14.3 with ``clang++ -O3 -DSPEED_TEST -DHAVE_FORMAT``, and taking the best of
|
||||
10.14.6 with ``clang++ -O3 -DSPEED_TEST -DHAVE_FORMAT``, and taking the best of
|
||||
three runs. In the test, the format string ``"%0.10f:%04d:%+g:%s:%p:%c:%%\n"``
|
||||
or equivalent is filled 2,000,000 times with output sent to ``/dev/null``; for
|
||||
further details refer to the `source
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user