211 lines
7.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
211 lines
7.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
format
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
Format is a C++ library that provides printf-like formatting functionality.
|
|
|
|
Features
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
* Format string syntax similar to the one used by `str.format
|
|
<http://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#str.format>`__ in Python.
|
|
* Support for user-defined types.
|
|
* High speed: performance of the current proof-of-concept implementation
|
|
is close to that of IOStreams (see `Speed tests`_).
|
|
* Small code size both in terms of source code (format consists of a single
|
|
header file and a single source file) and compiled code
|
|
(see `Compile time and code bloat`_).
|
|
* Easy deployment: small self-contained code base, no external dependencies,
|
|
permissive license.
|
|
|
|
Examples
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
This prints "Hello, world!" to stdout::
|
|
|
|
fmt::Print("Hello, {0}!") << "world";
|
|
|
|
Motivation
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
So why yet another formatting library?
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of methods for doing this task, from standard ones like
|
|
the printf family of function and IOStreams to Boost Format library and
|
|
FastFormat. The reason for creating a new library is that every existing
|
|
solution that I found either had serious issues or didn't provide
|
|
all the features I needed.
|
|
|
|
Printf
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The good thing about printf is that it is very fast and readily available
|
|
being the part of the C standard library. The main drawbacks are that it
|
|
doesn't support user-defined types, it is unsafe although the latter
|
|
problem is mostly solved with `__attribute__ ((format (printf, ...))
|
|
<http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html>`__ in GCC
|
|
and it doesn't support positional arguments required for `i18n
|
|
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalization_and_localization>`__.
|
|
|
|
IOStreams
|
|
~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The main issue with IOStreams is best illustrated with an example::
|
|
|
|
std::cout << std::setprecision(2) << std::fixed << 1.23456 << "\n";
|
|
|
|
which is a lot of typing compared to printf::
|
|
|
|
printf("%.2f\n", 1.23456);
|
|
|
|
Matthew Wilson, the author of FastFormat referred to this situations with
|
|
IOStreams as "chevron hell".
|
|
As with printf, there is no chance to support i18n.
|
|
|
|
The good part is that IOStreams supports user-defined types and is safe
|
|
although error reporting is awkward.
|
|
|
|
Boost Format library
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This is a very powerful library which supports both printf-like format
|
|
strings and positional arguments. The main its drawback is performance.
|
|
According to various benchmarks it is so slow that I wouldn't recommend
|
|
it for purposes other than occasional message reporting in small to medium
|
|
size projects that are not performance-critical. It also has excessive
|
|
build times and severe code bloat issues (see `Benchmarks`_).
|
|
|
|
FastFormat
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This is an interesting library which is fast, safe and has positional
|
|
arguments. However it has significant limitations, citing its author:
|
|
|
|
Three features that have no hope of being accommodated within the
|
|
current design are:
|
|
|
|
* Leading zeros (or any other non-space padding)
|
|
* Octal/hexadecimal encoding
|
|
* Runtime width/alignment specification
|
|
|
|
It is also quite big and has a heavy dependency, STLSoft, which might be
|
|
too restrictive for using it in some projects.
|
|
|
|
Loki SafeFormat
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
TODO
|
|
|
|
Tinyformat
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This library supports printf-like format strings and is very small and
|
|
fast. Unfortunately it doesn't support positional arguments and wrapping
|
|
it in C++98 is somewhat difficult. However if you only need a type-safe
|
|
printf replacement with support for user-defined types, I highly recommend
|
|
this library.
|
|
|
|
Benchmarks
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Compile time and code bloat
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Speed tests
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The following speed tests results were generated by building
|
|
``tinyformat_test.cpp`` on Ubuntu GNU/Linux 12.10 with
|
|
``g++-4.7.2 -O3 -DSPEED_TEST -DHAVE_FORMAT``, and taking the best of three
|
|
runs. In the test, the format string ``"%0.10f:%04d:%+g:%s:%p:%c:%%\n"`` or
|
|
equivalent is filled 2000000 times with output sent to ``/dev/null``; for
|
|
further details see the `source
|
|
<https://github.com/vitaut/tinyformat/blob/master/tinyformat_test.cpp>`__.
|
|
|
|
============== ========
|
|
test name run time
|
|
============== ========
|
|
libc printf 1.26s
|
|
std::ostream 2.02s
|
|
format 2.20s
|
|
tinyformat 2.51s
|
|
boost::format 10.40s
|
|
============== ========
|
|
|
|
As you can see boost::format is much slower than the alternative methods; this
|
|
is confirmed by `other tests <http://accu.org/index.php/journals/1539>`__.
|
|
Tinyformat is quite good coming close to IOStreams. Unfortunately tinyformat
|
|
cannot be faster than the IOStreams because it uses them internally.
|
|
Performance of format is close to that of std::ostream but there is a room for
|
|
improvement since format is not based on IOStreams.
|
|
|
|
The script ``bloat_test.sh`` from the `tinyformat
|
|
<https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat>`__ repository tests compile time and
|
|
code bloat for nontrivial projects. It generates 100 translation units
|
|
and uses ``printf()`` or its alternative five times in each to simulate
|
|
a medium sized project. The resulting executable size and compile time
|
|
(g++-4.7.2, Ubuntu GNU/Linux 12.10, best of three) is shown in the following
|
|
tables.
|
|
|
|
**Non-optimized build**
|
|
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
test name total compile time executable size (stripped)
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
libc printf 2.8s 44K (32K)
|
|
std::ostream 12.9s 84K (60K)
|
|
format 16.0s 152K (128K)
|
|
tinyformat 20.6s 240K (200K)
|
|
boost::format 76.0s 888K (780K)
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
|
|
**Optimized build (-O3)**
|
|
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
test name total compile time executable size (stripped)
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
libc printf 3.5s 40K (28K)
|
|
std::ostream 14.1s 88K (64K)
|
|
format 25.1s 552K (536K)
|
|
tinyformat 56.3s 200K (164K)
|
|
boost::format 169.4s 1.7M (1.6M)
|
|
====================== ================== ==========================
|
|
|
|
Printf and std::ostream win here which is not surprising considering
|
|
that they are included in the standard library. Tinyformat has somewhat
|
|
slower compilation times compared to format. Interestingly optimized
|
|
executable size is smaller with tinyformat then with format and for
|
|
non-optimized build its the other way around. Boost::format has by far
|
|
the largest overheads.
|
|
|
|
Running the tests
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
To run the tests you first need to get the format repository with submodules::
|
|
|
|
$ git clone --recursive git://github.com/vitaut/format.git
|
|
|
|
Then go to the format directory and generate Makefiles with
|
|
`CMake <http://www.cmake.org/>`__::
|
|
|
|
$ cd format
|
|
$ cmake .
|
|
|
|
Next use the following commands to run the speed test::
|
|
|
|
$ make speed_test
|
|
|
|
or the bloat test::
|
|
|
|
$ make bloat_test
|
|
|
|
Acknowledgments
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
The benchmark section of this readme file and the performance tests are taken
|
|
from the excellent `tinyformat <https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat>`__ library
|
|
written by Chris Foster. boost::format is acknowledged transitively since
|
|
it had some influence on tinyformat. Some ideas used in the implementation
|
|
are borrowed from `Loki <http://loki-lib.sourceforge.net/>`__ SafeFormat and
|
|
`Diagnostic API <http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1Diagnostic.html>`__
|
|
in `Clang <http://clang.llvm.org/>`__.
|