glibc/CONFORMANCE

Conformance of the GNU libc with various standards
==================================================

The GNU libc is designed to be conformant with existing standard as
far as possible.  To ensure this I've run various tests.  The results
are presented here.


Open Group's hdrchk
===================

The hdrchk test suite is available from the Open Group at

	ftp://ftp.rdg.opengroup.org/pub/unsupported/stdtools/hdrchk/

I've last run the suite on 2000-08-13 on a Linux/ix86 system with the
following results [*]:

	FIPS		No reported problems

	POSIX90		No reported problems

	XPG3		No reported problems

	XPG4		No reported problems

	POSIX96		Same as for UNIX98 (see below).
	UNIX98		The message queue implementation is missing:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/****** <mqueue.h> - Missing include file ******/
/****** Start of Definitions for file mqueue.h ******/
extern int mq_close();
extern int mq_getattr();
extern int mq_notify();
extern mqd_t mq_open();
extern ssize_t mq_receive();
extern int mq_send();
extern int mq_setattr();
extern int mq_unlink();
typedef <type> mqd_t;
struct mq_attr { <members> };
struct sigevent { <members> };
/****** End of Definitions for file mqueue.h ******/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[*] Since the scripts are not clever enough for the way gcc handles
include files (namely, putting some of them in gcc-local directory) I
copied over the iso646.h, float.h, and stddef.h headers and ignored the
problems resulting from the splitted limits.h file).


Technical C standards conformance issues in glibc
=================================================

If you compile programs against glibc with __STRICT_ANSI__ defined
(as, for example, by gcc -ansi, gcc -std=c89, gcc -std=iso1990:199409
or gcc -std=c99), and use only the headers specified by the version of
the C standard chosen, glibc will attempt to conform to that version
of the C standard (as indicated by __STDC_VERSION__):

GCC options		Standard version
-ansi			ISO/IEC 9899:1990
-std=c89		ISO/IEC 9899:1990
-std=iso9899:199409	ISO/IEC 9899:1990 as amended by Amd.1:1995 *
-std=c99		ISO/IEC 9899:1999

* glibc does not support this standard version.

(Note that -std=c99 is not available in GCC 2.95.2, and that no
version of GCC presently existing implements the full C99 standard.)

You may then define additional feature test macros to enable the
features from other standards, and use the headers defined in those
standards (for example, defining _POSIX_C_SOURCE to be 199506L to
enable features from ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996).

There are some technical ways in which glibc is known not to conform
to the supported versions of the C standard, as detailed below.  Some
of these relate to defects in the standard that are expected to be
fixed, or to compiler limitations.


Defects in the C99 standard
===========================

Some defects in C99 were corrected in Technical Corrigendum 1 to that
standard.  glibc follows the corrected specification.


Implementation of library functions
===================================

The implementation of some library functions does not fully follow the
standard specification:

C99 added additional forms of floating point constants (hexadecimal
constants, NaNs and infinities) to be recognised by strtod() and
scanf().  The effect is to change the behavior of some strictly
conforming C90 programs; glibc implements the C99 versions only
irrespective of the standard version selected.

C99 added %a as another scanf format specifier for floating point
values.  This conflicts with the glibc extension where %as, %a[ and
%aS mean to allocate the string for the data read.  A strictly
conforming C99 program using %as, %a[ or %aS in a scanf format string
will misbehave under glibc.


Compiler limitations
====================

The macros __STDC_IEC_559__, __STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__ and
__STDC_ISO_10646__ are properly supposed to be defined by the
compiler, and to be constant throughout the translation unit (before
and after any library headers are included).  However, they mainly
relate to library features, and the necessary magic has yet to be
implemented for GCC to predefine them to the correct values for the
library in use, so glibc defines them in <features.h>.  Programs that
test them before including any standard headers may misbehave.

GCC doesn't support the optional imaginary types.  Nor does it
understand the keyword _Complex before GCC 3.0.  This has the
corresponding impact on the relevant headers.

glibc's use of extern inline conflicts with C99: in C99, extern inline
means that an external definition is generated as well as possibly an
inline definition, but in GCC it means that no external definition is
generated.  When GCC's C99 mode implements C99 inline semantics, this
will break the uses of extern inline in glibc's headers.  (Actually,
glibc uses `extern __inline', which is beyond the scope of the
standard, but it would clearly be very confusing for `__inline' and
plain `inline' to have different meanings in C99 mode.)

glibc's <tgmath.h> implementation is arcane but thought to work
correctly; a clean and comprehensible version requires compiler
builtins.

For most of the headers required of freestanding implementations,
glibc relies on GCC to provide correct versions.  (At present, glibc
provides <stdint.h>, and GCC doesn't.)

Implementing MATH_ERRNO, MATH_ERREXCEPT and math_errhandling in
<math.h> needs compiler support: see

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00008.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00014.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-06/msg00015.html


Issues with headers
===================

There are various technical issues with the definitions contained in
glibc's headers, listed below.  The list below assumes GCC 3.3.2, and
relates to i686-linux; older GCC may lead to more problems in the
headers.

Note that the _t suffix is reserved by POSIX, but not by pure ISO C.
Also, the Single Unix Specification generally requires more types to
be included in headers (if _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined appropriately)
than ISO C permits.

<ctype.h> should not declare size_t.

<signal.h> should not declare size_t.

<stdio.h> should not declare or use wchar_t or wint_t.

<wchar.h> does not support AMD1; to support it, the functions
fwprintf, fwscanf, wprintf, wscanf, swprintf, swscanf, vfwprintf,
vwprintf, vswprintf and fwide would need to be declared when
__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199409L and not just for C99.

<wctype.h> should not declare size_t.