mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
synced 2024-11-24 22:10:13 +00:00
[BZ #5012]
* FAQ.in: Describe why glibc needs to be compiled with optimization.
This commit is contained in:
parent
73b82641f4
commit
c49e86f103
26
FAQ.in
26
FAQ.in
@ -387,6 +387,31 @@ yourself. Please remember that for each architecture there may be various
|
|||||||
patches required to get glibc HEAD into a runnable state. The best course
|
patches required to get glibc HEAD into a runnable state. The best course
|
||||||
of action is to determine if you have all the required patches.
|
of action is to determine if you have all the required patches.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
?? Why do I get:
|
||||||
|
`#error "glibc cannot be compiled without optimization"',
|
||||||
|
when trying to compile GNU libc with GNU CC?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{AJ,CO} There are a couple of reasons why the GNU C library will not work
|
||||||
|
correctly if it is not complied with optimzation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the early startup of the dynamic loader (_dl_start), before
|
||||||
|
relocation of the PLT, you cannot make function calls. You must inline
|
||||||
|
the functions you will use during early startup, or call compiler
|
||||||
|
builtins (__builtin_*).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Without optimizations enabled GNU CC will not inline functions. The
|
||||||
|
early startup of the dynamic loader will make function calls via an
|
||||||
|
unrelocated PLT and crash.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Without auditing the dynamic linker code it would be difficult to remove
|
||||||
|
this requirement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Another reason is that nested functions must be inlined in many cases to
|
||||||
|
avoid executable stacks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In practice there is no reason to compile without optimizations, therefore
|
||||||
|
we require that GNU libc be compiled with optimizations enabled.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
? Installation and configuration issues
|
? Installation and configuration issues
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
?? Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?
|
?? Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?
|
||||||
@ -1685,6 +1710,7 @@ Answers were given by:
|
|||||||
{AO} Alexandre Oliva, <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
{AO} Alexandre Oliva, <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
||||||
{BH} Bruno Haible, <haible@clisp.cons.org>
|
{BH} Bruno Haible, <haible@clisp.cons.org>
|
||||||
{SM} Steven Munroe, <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
|
{SM} Steven Munroe, <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>
|
||||||
|
{CO} Carlos O'Donell, <carlos@systemhalted.org>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Local Variables:
|
Local Variables:
|
||||||
mode:outline
|
mode:outline
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user