http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-08/msg00081.html
This is the first of a series of patches to ban ieee854_long_double
and the ieee854_long_double macros when using IBM long double. union
ieee854_long_double just isn't correct for IBM long double, especially
when little-endian, and pretending it is OK has allowed a number of
bugs to remain undetected in sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/.
This changes the few places in generic code that use it.
* stdio-common/printf_size.c (__printf_size): Don't use
union ieee854_long_double in fpnum union.
* stdio-common/printf_fphex.c (__printf_fphex): Likewise. Use
signbit macro to retrieve sign from long double.
* stdio-common/printf_fp.c (___printf_fp): Use signbit macro to
retrieve sign from long double.
* sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/printf_fphex.c: Adjust for fpnum change.
* sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128/printf_fphex.c: Likewise.
* sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96/printf_fphex.c: Likewise.
* sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/printf_fphex.c: Likewise.
* math/test-misc.c (main): Don't use union ieee854_long_double.
ports/
* sysdeps/ia64/fpu/printf_fphex.c: Adjust for fpnum change.
Another example of all the 64bit arches getting the definition via a
common file, but the 32bit ones all adding it by themselves and hppa
was missed.
I'm not entirely sure about the usage of GLIBC_2.19 symbols here.
We'd like to backport this so people can use it, but it means we'd
be releasing a glibc-2.17/glibc-2.18 with a GLIBC_2.19 symbol in it.
But maybe it won't be a big deal since you'd only get that 2.19 ref
if you actually used the symbol ?
There hasn't been a glibc release where hppa worked w/out a bunch of
patches, so in reality there's only two distros that matter -- Gentoo
and Debian.
Reported-by: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
