__tls_get_addr/___tls_get_addr is always defined in ld.so. There is
no need to call them via PLT inside ld.so. This patch adds the hidden
__tls_get_addr/___tls_get_addr aliases and calls them directly from
_dl_tlsdesc_dynamic. There is no need to set up the EBX register in
i386 _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic when calling the hidden ___tls_get_addr.
* elf/dl-tls.c (__tls_get_addr): Provide the hidden definition
if not defined.
* sysdeps/i386/dl-tls.h (___tls_get_addr): Provide the hidden
definition.
* sysdeps/i386/dl-tlsdesc.S (_dl_tlsdesc_dynamic): Call the
hidden ___tls_get_addr.
* sysdeps/x86_64/dl-tlsdesc.S (_dl_tlsdesc_dynamic): Call the
hidden __tls_get_addr.
* sysdeps/generic/localplt.data (__tls_get_addr): Removed.
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/localplt.data (___tls_get_addr):
Likewise.
For maximum paranoia we run ld.so through the normal set
of tests for all of the shared libraries. This includes
running ld.so through check-localplt, check-textrel, and
check-execstack. While none of these should trigger any
failures given the way ld.so is built, it might possibly
fail if a developer does something wrong. This paranoia
was triggered by a discussion over the use of __strcpy
vs. strcpy [1] and if the symbol could leak and use the
libc.so version.
The check-localplt test fails right away because localplt.data
needs updating for all arches. By default we add 6 new symbols:
__tls_get_addr, __libc_memalign, malloc, calloc, realloc and
free. Other machines like i386, power, and s390 require some
different symbol sets e.g. ___tls_get_addr vs. __tls_get_addr
for i386.
Verified for i386
Verified for x86_64
Verified for ppc32
Verified for ppc64
Verified for ppc64le
Verified for arm
Verified for aarch64
Verified for s390
Verified for s390x
Guessed for alpha
Guessed for ia64
Guessed for m68k
Guessed for microblaze
Guessed for sparc32
Guessed for sparc64
Defaults for sh
Defaults for mips
Defaults for hppa
Defaults for tile
Machine manintainers notified to double check the data
used in localplt.data.
[1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-10/msg00548.html
