Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Eggert
581c785bf3 Update copyright dates with scripts/update-copyrights
I used these shell commands:

../glibc/scripts/update-copyrights $PWD/../gnulib/build-aux/update-copyright
(cd ../glibc && git commit -am"[this commit message]")

and then ignored the output, which consisted lines saying "FOO: warning:
copyright statement not found" for each of 7061 files FOO.

I then removed trailing white space from math/tgmath.h,
support/tst-support-open-dev-null-range.c, and
sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strlen-vec.S, to work around the following
obscure pre-commit check failure diagnostics from Savannah.  I don't
know why I run into these diagnostics whereas others evidently do not.

remote: *** 912-#endif
remote: *** 913:
remote: *** 914-
remote: *** error: lines with trailing whitespace found
...
remote: *** error: sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/statx_cp.c: trailing lines
2022-01-01 11:40:24 -08:00
Paul Eggert
2b778ceb40 Update copyright dates with scripts/update-copyrights
I used these shell commands:

../glibc/scripts/update-copyrights $PWD/../gnulib/build-aux/update-copyright
(cd ../glibc && git commit -am"[this commit message]")

and then ignored the output, which consisted lines saying "FOO: warning:
copyright statement not found" for each of 6694 files FOO.
I then removed trailing white space from benchtests/bench-pthread-locks.c
and iconvdata/tst-iconv-big5-hkscs-to-2ucs4.c, to work around this
diagnostic from Savannah:
remote: *** pre-commit check failed ...
remote: *** error: lines with trailing whitespace found
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master
2021-01-02 12:17:34 -08:00
Adhemerval Zanella
4f7092348d linux: Simplify clock_adjtime
With arch-syscall.h it can now assumes the existance of either
__NR_clock_adjtime or __NR_clock_adjtime_time64.  The 32-bit time_t
support is now only build for !__ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS.

Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu (on 5.4 and on 4.15
kernel).

Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
2020-08-24 14:27:19 -03:00
Lukasz Majewski
63ff4a6d17 y2038: linux: Provide __clock_adjtime64 implementation
This patch replaces auto generated wrapper (as described in
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list) for clock_adjtime with one which adds
extra support for reading 64 bit time values on machines with __TIMESIZE != 64.

To achieve this goal new __clock_adjtime64 explicit 64 bit function for
adjusting Linux clock has been added.
Moreover, a 32 bit version - __clock_adjtime has been refactored to internally
use __clock_adjtime64.

The __clock_adjtime is now supposed to be used on systems still supporting 32
bit time (__TIMESIZE != 64) - hence the necessary conversions between 64 bit
struct __timespec64 and struct timespec.

The new __clock_adjtime64 syscall available from Linux 5.1+ has been used, when
applicable.
Up till v5.4 in the Linux kernel there was a bug preventing this call from
obtaining correct struct's timex time.tv_sec time after time_t overflow
(i.e. not being Y2038 safe).

Build tests:
- ./src/scripts/build-many-glibcs.py glibcs

Run-time tests:
- Run specific tests on ARM/x86 32bit systems (qemu):
  https://github.com/lmajewski/meta-y2038 and run tests:
  https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038-tests/commits/master

Linux kernel, headers and minimal kernel version for glibc build test matrix:
- Linux v5.1 (with clock_adjtime64) and glibc build with v5.1 as
  minimal kernel version (--enable-kernel="5.1.0")
  The __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS flag defined.

- Linux v5.1 and default minimal kernel version
  The __ASSUME_TIME64_SYSCALLS not defined, but kernel supports clock_adjtime64
  syscall.

- Linux v4.19 (no clock_adjtime64 support) with default minimal kernel version
  for contemporary glibc (3.2.0)
  This kernel doesn't support clock_adjtime64 syscall, so the fallback to
  clock_adjtime is tested.

Above tests were performed with Y2038 redirection applied as well as without
(so the __TIMESIZE != 64 execution path is checked as well).

No regressions were observed.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
2020-05-20 01:03:26 +02:00