mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
synced 2024-12-11 13:50:06 +00:00
639c6286de
* manual/resource.texi: Document POSIX scheduling functions. Patch by Bryan Henderson <bryanh@giraffe-data.com>.
1245 lines
44 KiB
Plaintext
1245 lines
44 KiB
Plaintext
@node Resource Usage And Limitation, Non-Local Exits, Date and Time, Top
|
|
@c %MENU% Functions for examining resource usage and getting and setting limits
|
|
@chapter Resource Usage And Limitation
|
|
This chapter describes functions for examining how much of various kinds of
|
|
resources (CPU time, memory, etc.) a process has used and getting and setting
|
|
limits on future usage.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Resource Usage:: Measuring various resources used.
|
|
* Limits on Resources:: Specifying limits on resource usage.
|
|
* Priority:: Reading or setting process run priority.
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Resource Usage
|
|
@section Resource Usage
|
|
|
|
@pindex sys/resource.h
|
|
The function @code{getrusage} and the data type @code{struct rusage}
|
|
are used to examine the resource usage of a process. They are declared
|
|
in @file{sys/resource.h}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftypefun int getrusage (int @var{processes}, struct rusage *@var{rusage})
|
|
This function reports resource usage totals for processes specified by
|
|
@var{processes}, storing the information in @code{*@var{rusage}}.
|
|
|
|
In most systems, @var{processes} has only two valid values:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RUSAGE_SELF
|
|
Just the current process.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RUSAGE_CHILDREN
|
|
All child processes (direct and indirect) that have already terminated.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
In the GNU system, you can also inquire about a particular child process
|
|
by specifying its process ID.
|
|
|
|
The return value of @code{getrusage} is zero for success, and @code{-1}
|
|
for failure.
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
The argument @var{processes} is not valid.
|
|
@end table
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
One way of getting resource usage for a particular child process is with
|
|
the function @code{wait4}, which returns totals for a child when it
|
|
terminates. @xref{BSD Wait Functions}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftp {Data Type} {struct rusage}
|
|
This data type stores various resource usage statistics. It has the
|
|
following members, and possibly others:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item struct timeval ru_utime
|
|
Time spent executing user instructions.
|
|
|
|
@item struct timeval ru_stime
|
|
Time spent in operating system code on behalf of @var{processes}.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_maxrss
|
|
The maximum resident set size used, in kilobytes. That is, the maximum
|
|
number of kilobytes of physical memory that @var{processes} used
|
|
simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_ixrss
|
|
An integral value expressed in kilobytes times ticks of execution, which
|
|
indicates the amount of memory used by text that was shared with other
|
|
processes.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_idrss
|
|
An integral value expressed the same way, which is the amount of
|
|
unshared memory used for data.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_isrss
|
|
An integral value expressed the same way, which is the amount of
|
|
unshared memory used for stack space.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_minflt
|
|
The number of page faults which were serviced without requiring any I/O.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_majflt
|
|
The number of page faults which were serviced by doing I/O.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_nswap
|
|
The number of times @var{processes} was swapped entirely out of main memory.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_inblock
|
|
The number of times the file system had to read from the disk on behalf
|
|
of @var{processes}.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_oublock
|
|
The number of times the file system had to write to the disk on behalf
|
|
of @var{processes}.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_msgsnd
|
|
Number of IPC messages sent.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_msgrcv
|
|
Number of IPC messages received.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_nsignals
|
|
Number of signals received.
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_nvcsw
|
|
The number of times @var{processes} voluntarily invoked a context switch
|
|
(usually to wait for some service).
|
|
|
|
@item long int ru_nivcsw
|
|
The number of times an involuntary context switch took place (because
|
|
a time slice expired, or another process of higher priority was
|
|
scheduled).
|
|
@end table
|
|
@end deftp
|
|
|
|
@code{vtimes} is a historical function that does some of what
|
|
@code{getrusage} does. @code{getrusage} is a better choice.
|
|
|
|
@code{vtimes} and its @code{vtimes} data structure are declared in
|
|
@file{sys/vtimes.h}.
|
|
@pindex sys/vtimes.h
|
|
@comment vtimes.h
|
|
|
|
@deftypefun int vtimes (struct vtimes @var{current}, struct vtimes @var{child})
|
|
|
|
@code{vtimes} reports resource usage totals for a process.
|
|
|
|
If @var{current} is non-null, @code{vtimes} stores resource usage totals for
|
|
the invoking process alone in the structure to which it points. If
|
|
@var{child} is non-null, @code{vtimes} stores resource usage totals for all
|
|
past children (which have terminated) of the invoking process in the structure
|
|
to which it points.
|
|
|
|
@deftp {Data Type} {struct vtimes}
|
|
This data type contains information about the resource usage of a process.
|
|
Each member corresponds to a member of the @code{struct rusage} data type
|
|
described above.
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item vm_utime
|
|
User CPU time. Analogous to @code{ru_utime} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_stime
|
|
System CPU time. Analogous to @code{ru_stime} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_idsrss
|
|
Data and stack memory. The sum of the values that would be reported as
|
|
@code{ru_idrss} and @code{ru_isrss} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_ixrss
|
|
Shared memory. Analogous to @code{ru_ixrss} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_maxrss
|
|
Maximent resident set size. Analogous to @code{ru_maxrss} in
|
|
@code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_majflt
|
|
Major page faults. Analogous to @code{ru_majflt} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_minflt
|
|
Minor page faults. Analogous to @code{ru_minflt} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_nswap
|
|
Swap count. Analogous to @code{ru_nswap} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_inblk
|
|
Disk reads. Analogous to @code{ru_inblk} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@item vm_oublk
|
|
Disk writes. Analogous to @code{ru_oublk} in @code{struct rusage}
|
|
@end table
|
|
@end deftp
|
|
|
|
|
|
The return value is zero if the function succeeds; @code{-1} otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
An additional historical function for examining resource usage,
|
|
@code{vtimes}, is supported but not documented here. It is declared in
|
|
@file{sys/vtimes.h}.
|
|
|
|
@node Limits on Resources
|
|
@section Limiting Resource Usage
|
|
@cindex resource limits
|
|
@cindex limits on resource usage
|
|
@cindex usage limits
|
|
|
|
You can specify limits for the resource usage of a process. When the
|
|
process tries to exceed a limit, it may get a signal, or the system call
|
|
by which it tried to do so may fail, depending on the resource. Each
|
|
process initially inherits its limit values from its parent, but it can
|
|
subsequently change them.
|
|
|
|
There are two per-process limits associated with a resource:
|
|
@cindex limit
|
|
|
|
@table @dfn
|
|
@item current limit
|
|
The current limit is the value the system will not allow usage to
|
|
exceed. It is also called the ``soft limit'' because the process being
|
|
limited can generally raise the current limit at will.
|
|
@cindex current limit
|
|
@cindex soft limit
|
|
|
|
@item maximum limit
|
|
The maximum limit is the maximum value to which a process is allowed to
|
|
set its current limit. It is also called the ``hard limit'' because
|
|
there is no way for a process to get around it. A process may lower
|
|
its own maximum limit, but only the superuser may increase a maximum
|
|
limit.
|
|
@cindex maximum limit
|
|
@cindex hard limit
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@pindex sys/resource.h
|
|
The symbols for use with @code{getrlimit}, @code{setrlimit},
|
|
@code{getrlimit64}, and @code{seterlimit64} are defined in
|
|
@file{sys/resource.h}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftypefun int getrlimit (int @var{resource}, struct rlimit *@var{rlp})
|
|
Read the current and maximum limits for the resource @var{resource}
|
|
and store them in @code{*@var{rlp}}.
|
|
|
|
The return value is @code{0} on success and @code{-1} on failure. The
|
|
only possible @code{errno} error condition is @code{EFAULT}.
|
|
|
|
When the sources are compiled with @code{_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64} on a
|
|
32-bit system this function is in fact @code{getrlimit64}. Thus, the
|
|
LFS interface transparently replaces the old interface.
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment Unix98
|
|
@deftypefun int getrlimit64 (int @var{resource}, struct rlimit64 *@var{rlp})
|
|
This function is similar to @code{getrlimit} but its second parameter is
|
|
a pointer to a variable of type @code{struct rlimit64}, which allows it
|
|
to read values which wouldn't fit in the member of a @code{struct
|
|
rlimit}.
|
|
|
|
If the sources are compiled with @code{_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64} on a
|
|
32-bit machine, this function is available under the name
|
|
@code{getrlimit} and so transparently replaces the old interface.
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftypefun int setrlimit (int @var{resource}, const struct rlimit *@var{rlp})
|
|
Store the current and maximum limits for the resource @var{resource}
|
|
in @code{*@var{rlp}}.
|
|
|
|
The return value is @code{0} on success and @code{-1} on failure. The
|
|
following @code{errno} error condition is possible:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EPERM
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
The process tried to raise a current limit beyond the maximum limit.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The process tried to raise a maximum limit, but is not superuser.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
When the sources are compiled with @code{_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64} on a
|
|
32-bit system this function is in fact @code{setrlimit64}. Thus, the
|
|
LFS interface transparently replaces the old interface.
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment Unix98
|
|
@deftypefun int setrlimit64 (int @var{resource}, const struct rlimit64 *@var{rlp})
|
|
This function is similar to @code{setrlimit} but its second parameter is
|
|
a pointer to a variable of type @code{struct rlimit64} which allows it
|
|
to set values which wouldn't fit in the member of a @code{struct
|
|
rlimit}.
|
|
|
|
If the sources are compiled with @code{_FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64} on a
|
|
32-bit machine this function is available under the name
|
|
@code{setrlimit} and so transparently replaces the old interface.
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftp {Data Type} {struct rlimit}
|
|
This structure is used with @code{getrlimit} to receive limit values,
|
|
and with @code{setrlimit} to specify limit values for a particular process
|
|
and resource. It has two fields:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item rlim_t rlim_cur
|
|
The current limit
|
|
|
|
@item rlim_t rlim_max
|
|
The maximum limit.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
For @code{getrlimit}, the structure is an output; it receives the current
|
|
values. For @code{setrlimit}, it specifies the new values.
|
|
@end deftp
|
|
|
|
For the LFS functions a similar type is defined in @file{sys/resource.h}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment Unix98
|
|
@deftp {Data Type} {struct rlimit64}
|
|
This structure is analogous to the @code{rlimit} structure above, but
|
|
its components have wider ranges. It has two fields:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item rlim64_t rlim_cur
|
|
This is analogous to @code{rlimit.rlim_cur}, but with a different type.
|
|
|
|
@item rlim64_t rlim_max
|
|
This is analogous to @code{rlimit.rlim_max}, but with a different type.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftp
|
|
|
|
Here is a list of resources for which you can specify a limit. Memory
|
|
and file sizes are measured in bytes.
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_CPU
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_CPU
|
|
The maximum amount of CPU time the process can use. If it runs for
|
|
longer than this, it gets a signal: @code{SIGXCPU}. The value is
|
|
measured in seconds. @xref{Operation Error Signals}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_FSIZE
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_FSIZE
|
|
The maximum size of file the process can create. Trying to write a
|
|
larger file causes a signal: @code{SIGXFSZ}. @xref{Operation Error
|
|
Signals}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_DATA
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_DATA
|
|
The maximum size of data memory for the process. If the process tries
|
|
to allocate data memory beyond this amount, the allocation function
|
|
fails.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_STACK
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_STACK
|
|
The maximum stack size for the process. If the process tries to extend
|
|
its stack past this size, it gets a @code{SIGSEGV} signal.
|
|
@xref{Program Error Signals}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_CORE
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_CORE
|
|
The maximum size core file that this process can create. If the process
|
|
terminates and would dump a core file larger than this, then no core
|
|
file is created. So setting this limit to zero prevents core files from
|
|
ever being created.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_RSS
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_RSS
|
|
The maximum amount of physical memory that this process should get.
|
|
This parameter is a guide for the system's scheduler and memory
|
|
allocator; the system may give the process more memory when there is a
|
|
surplus.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
|
|
The maximum amount of memory that can be locked into physical memory (so
|
|
it will never be paged out).
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_NPROC
|
|
The maximum number of processes that can be created with the same user ID.
|
|
If you have reached the limit for your user ID, @code{fork} will fail
|
|
with @code{EAGAIN}. @xref{Creating a Process}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIMIT_NOFILE
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_NOFILE
|
|
@itemx RLIMIT_OFILE
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_OFILE
|
|
The maximum number of files that the process can open. If it tries to
|
|
open more files than this, its open attempt fails with @code{errno}
|
|
@code{EMFILE}. @xref{Error Codes}. Not all systems support this limit;
|
|
GNU does, and 4.4 BSD does.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment Unix98
|
|
@item RLIMIT_AS
|
|
@vindex RLIMIT_AS
|
|
The maximum size of total memory that this process should get. If the
|
|
process tries to allocate more memory beyond this amount with, for
|
|
example, @code{brk}, @code{malloc}, @code{mmap} or @code{sbrk}, the
|
|
allocation function fails.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item RLIM_NLIMITS
|
|
@vindex RLIM_NLIMITS
|
|
The number of different resource limits. Any valid @var{resource}
|
|
operand must be less than @code{RLIM_NLIMITS}.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@deftypevr Constant int RLIM_INFINITY
|
|
This constant stands for a value of ``infinity'' when supplied as
|
|
the limit value in @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@end deftypevr
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are historical functions to do some of what the functions
|
|
above do. The functions above are better choices.
|
|
|
|
@code{ulimit} and the command symbols are declared in @file{ulimit.h}.
|
|
@pindex ulimit.h
|
|
@comment ulimit.h
|
|
|
|
@deftypefun int ulimit (int @var{cmd}, ...)
|
|
|
|
@code{ulimit} gets the current limit or sets the current and maximum
|
|
limit for a particular resource for the calling process according to the
|
|
command @var{cmd}.a
|
|
|
|
If you are getting a limit, the command argument is the only argument.
|
|
If you are setting a limit, there is a second argument:
|
|
@code{long int} @var{limit} which is the value to which you are setting
|
|
the limit.
|
|
|
|
The @var{cmd} values and the operations they specify are:
|
|
@table @code
|
|
|
|
@item GETFSIZE
|
|
Get the current limit on the size of a file, in units of 512 bytes.
|
|
|
|
@item SETFSIZE
|
|
Set the current and maximum limit on the size of a file to @var{limit} *
|
|
512 bytes.
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
There are also some other @var{cmd} values that may do things on some
|
|
systems, but they are not supported.
|
|
|
|
Only the superuser may increase a maximum limit.
|
|
|
|
When you successfully get a limit, the return value of @code{ulimit} is
|
|
that limit, which is never negative. When you successfully set a limit,
|
|
the return value is zero. When the function fails, the return value is
|
|
@code{-1} and @code{errno} is set according to the reason:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EPERM
|
|
A process tried to increase a maximum limit, but is not superuser.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@code{vlimit} and its resource symbols are declared in @file{sys/vlimit.h}.
|
|
@comment sys/vlimit.h
|
|
@pindex sys/vlimit.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
|
|
@deftypefun int vlimit (int @var{resource}, int @var{limit})
|
|
|
|
@code{vlimit} sets the current limit for a resource for a process.
|
|
|
|
@var{resource} identifies the resource:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item LIM_CPU
|
|
Maximum CPU time. Same as @code{RLIMIT_CPU} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@item LIM_FSIZE
|
|
Maximum file size. Same as @code{RLIMIT_FSIZE} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@item LIM_DATA
|
|
Maximum data memory. Same as @code{RLIMIT_DATA} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@item LIM_STACK
|
|
Maximum stack size. Same as @code{RLIMIT_STACK} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@item LIM_CORE
|
|
Maximum core file size. Same as @code{RLIMIT_COR} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@item LIM_MAXRSS
|
|
Maximum physical memory. Same as @code{RLIMIT_RSS} for @code{setrlimit}.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
The return value is zero for success, and @code{-1} with @code{errno} set
|
|
accordingly for failure:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EPERM
|
|
The process tried to set its current limit beyond its maximum limit.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@node Priority
|
|
@section Process CPU Priority And Scheduling
|
|
@cindex process priority
|
|
@cindex cpu priority
|
|
@cindex priority of a process
|
|
|
|
When multiple processes simultaneously require CPU time, the system's
|
|
scheduling policy and process CPU priorities determine which processes
|
|
get it. This section describes how that determination is made and
|
|
GNU C library functions to control it.
|
|
|
|
It is common to refer to CPU scheduling simply as scheduling and a
|
|
process' CPU priority simply as the process' priority, with the CPU
|
|
resource being implied. Bear in mind, though, that CPU time is not the
|
|
only resource a process uses or that processes contend for. In some
|
|
cases, it is not even particularly important. Giving a process a high
|
|
``priority'' may have very little effect on how fast a process runs with
|
|
respect to other processes. The priorities discussed in this section
|
|
apply only to CPU time.
|
|
|
|
CPU scheduling is a complex issue and different systems do it in wildly
|
|
different ways. New ideas continually develop and find their way into
|
|
the intricacies of the various systems' scheduling algorithms. This
|
|
section discusses the general concepts, some specifics of systems
|
|
that commonly use the GNU C library, and some standards.
|
|
|
|
For simplicity, we talk about CPU contention as if there is only one CPU
|
|
in the system. But all the same principles apply when a processor has
|
|
multiple CPUs, and knowing that the number of processes that can run at
|
|
any one time is equal to the number of CPUs, you can easily extrapolate
|
|
the information.
|
|
|
|
The functions described in this section are all defined by the POSIX.1
|
|
and POSIX.1b standards (the @code{sched...} functions are POSIX.1b).
|
|
However, POSIX does not define any semantics for the values that these
|
|
functions get and set. In this chapter, the semantics are based on the
|
|
Linux kernel's implementation of the POSIX standard. As you will see,
|
|
the Linux implementation is quite the inverse of what the authors of the
|
|
POSIX syntax had in mind.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Absolute Priority:: The first tier of priority. Posix
|
|
* Realtime Scheduling:: Scheduling among the process nobility
|
|
* Basic Scheduling Functions:: Get/set scheduling policy, priority
|
|
* Traditional Scheduling:: Scheduling among the vulgar masses
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Absolute Priority
|
|
@subsection Absolute Priority
|
|
@cindex absolute priority
|
|
@cindex priority, absolute
|
|
|
|
Every process has an absolute priority, and it is represented by a number.
|
|
The higher the number, the higher the absolute priority.
|
|
|
|
@cindex realtime CPU scheduling
|
|
On systems of the past, and most systems today, all processes have
|
|
absolute priority 0 and this section is irrelevant. In that case,
|
|
@xref{Traditional Scheduling}. Absolute priorities were invented to
|
|
accomodate realtime systems, in which it is vital that certain processes
|
|
be able to respond to external events happening in real time, which
|
|
means they cannot wait around while some other process that @emph{wants
|
|
to}, but doesn't @emph{need to} run occupies the CPU.
|
|
|
|
@cindex ready to run
|
|
@cindex preemptive scheduling
|
|
When two processes are in contention to use the CPU at any instant, the
|
|
one with the higher absolute priority always gets it. This is true even if the
|
|
process with the lower priority is already using the CPU (i.e. the
|
|
scheduling is preemptive). Of course, we're only talking about
|
|
processes that are running or ``ready to run,'' which means they are
|
|
ready to execute instructions right now. When a process blocks to wait
|
|
for something like I/O, its absolute priority is irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
@cindex runnable process
|
|
@strong{Note:} The term ``runnable'' is a synonym for ``ready to run.''
|
|
|
|
When two processes are running or ready to run and both have the same
|
|
absolute priority, it's more interesting. In that case, who gets the
|
|
CPU is determined by the scheduling policy. If the processeses have
|
|
absolute priority 0, the traditional scheduling policy described in
|
|
@ref{Traditional Scheduling} applies. Otherwise, the policies described
|
|
in @ref{Realtime Scheduling} apply.
|
|
|
|
You normally give an absolute priority above 0 only to a process that
|
|
can be trusted not to hog the CPU. Such processes are designed to block
|
|
(or terminate) after relatively short CPU runs.
|
|
|
|
A process begins life with the same absolute priority as its parent
|
|
process. Functions described in @ref{Basic Scheduling Functions} can
|
|
change it.
|
|
|
|
Only a privileged process can change a process' absolute priority to
|
|
something other than @code{0}. Only a privileged process or the
|
|
target process' owner can change its absolute priority at all.
|
|
|
|
POSIX requires absolute priority values used with the realtime
|
|
scheduling policies to be consecutive with a range of at least 32. On
|
|
Linux, they are 1 through 99. The functions
|
|
@code{sched_get_priority_max} and @code{sched_set_priority_min} portably
|
|
tell you what the range is on a particular system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
@subsubsection Using Absolute Priority
|
|
|
|
One thing you must keep in mind when designing real time applications is
|
|
that having higher absolute priority than any other process doesn't
|
|
guarantee the process can run continuously. Two things that can wreck a
|
|
good CPU run are interrupts and page faults.
|
|
|
|
Interrupt handlers live in that limbo between processes. The CPU is
|
|
executing instructions, but they aren't part of any process. An
|
|
interrupt will stop even the highest priority process. So you must
|
|
allow for slight delays and make sure that no device in the system has
|
|
an interrupt handler that could cause too long a delay between
|
|
instructions for your process.
|
|
|
|
Similarly, a page fault causes what looks like a straightforward
|
|
sequence of instructions to take a long time. The fact that other
|
|
processes get to run while the page faults in is of no consequence,
|
|
because as soon as the I/O is complete, the high priority process will
|
|
kick them out and run again, but the wait for the I/O itself could be a
|
|
problem. To neutralize this threat, use @code{mlock} or
|
|
@code{mlockall}.
|
|
|
|
There are a few ramifications of the absoluteness of this priority on a
|
|
single-CPU system that you need to keep in mind when you choose to set a
|
|
priority and also when you're working on a program that runs with high
|
|
absolute priority. Consider a process that has higher absolute priority
|
|
than any other process in the system and due to a bug in its program, it
|
|
gets into an infinite loop. It will never cede the CPU. You can't run
|
|
a command to kill it because your command would need to get the CPU in
|
|
order to run. The errant program is in complete control. It controls
|
|
the vertical, it controls the horizontal.
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to avoid this: 1) keep a shell running somewhere with
|
|
a higher absolute priority. 2) keep a controlling terminal attached to
|
|
the high priority process group. All the priority in the world won't
|
|
stop an interrupt handler from running and delivering a signal to the
|
|
process if you hit Control-C.
|
|
|
|
Some systems use absolute priority as a means of allocating a fixed per
|
|
centage of CPU time to a process. To do this, a super high priority
|
|
privileged process constantly monitors the process' CPU usage and raises
|
|
its absolute priority when the process isn't getting its entitled share
|
|
and lowers it when the process is exceeding it.
|
|
|
|
@strong{Note:} The absolute priority is sometimes called the ``static
|
|
priority.'' We don't use that term in this manual because it misses the
|
|
most important feature of the absolute priority: its absoluteness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
@node Realtime Scheduling
|
|
@subsection Realtime Scheduling
|
|
@comment realtime scheduling
|
|
|
|
Whenever two processes with the same absolute priority are ready to run,
|
|
the kernel has a decision to make, because only one can run at a time.
|
|
If the processes have absolute priority 0, the kernel makes this decision
|
|
as described in @ref{Traditional Scheduling}. Otherwise, the decision
|
|
is as described in this section.
|
|
|
|
If two processes are ready to run but have different absolute priorities,
|
|
the decision is much simpler, and is described in @ref{Absolute
|
|
Priority}.
|
|
|
|
Each process has a scheduling policy. For processes with absolute
|
|
priority other than zero, there are two available:
|
|
|
|
@enumerate
|
|
@item
|
|
First Come First Served
|
|
@item
|
|
Round Robin
|
|
@end enumerate
|
|
|
|
The most sensible case is where all the processes with a certain
|
|
absolute priority have the same scheduling policy. We'll discuss that
|
|
first.
|
|
|
|
In Round Robin, processes share the CPU, each one running for a small
|
|
quantum of time (``time slice'') and then yielding to another in a
|
|
circular fashion. Of course, only processes that are ready to run and
|
|
have the same absolute priority are in this circle.
|
|
|
|
In First Come First Served, the process that has been waiting the
|
|
longest to run gets the CPU, and it keeps it until it voluntarily
|
|
relinquishes the CPU, runs out of things to do (blocks), or gets
|
|
preempted by a higher priority process.
|
|
|
|
First Come First Served, along with maximal absolute priority and
|
|
careful control of interrupts and page faults, is the one to use when a
|
|
process absolutely, positively has to run at full CPU speed or not at
|
|
all.
|
|
|
|
Judicious use of @code{sched_yield} function invocations by processes
|
|
with First Come First Served scheduling policy forms a good compromise
|
|
between Round Robin and First Come First Served.
|
|
|
|
To understand how scheduling works when processes of different scheduling
|
|
policies occupy the same absolute priority, you have to know the nitty
|
|
gritty details of how processes enter and exit the ready to run list:
|
|
|
|
In both cases, the ready to run list is organized as a true queue, where
|
|
a process gets pushed onto the tail when it becomes ready to run and is
|
|
popped off the head when the scheduler decides to run it. Note that
|
|
ready to run and running are two mutually exclusive states. When the
|
|
scheduler runs a process, that process is no longer ready to run and no
|
|
longer in the ready to run list. When the process stops running, it
|
|
may go back to being ready to run again.
|
|
|
|
The only difference between a process that is assigned the Round Robin
|
|
scheduling policy and a process that is assigned First Come First Serve
|
|
is that in the former case, the process is automatically booted off the
|
|
CPU after a certain amount of time. When that happens, the process goes
|
|
back to being ready to run, which means it enters the queue at the tail.
|
|
The time quantum we're talking about is small. Really small. This is
|
|
not your father's timesharing. For example, with the Linux kernel, the
|
|
round robin time slice is a thousand times shorter than its typical
|
|
time slice for traditional scheduling.
|
|
|
|
A process begins life with the same scheduling policy as its parent process.
|
|
Functions described in @ref{Basic Scheduling Functions} can change it.
|
|
|
|
Only a privileged process can set the scheduling policy of a process
|
|
that has absolute priority higher than 0.
|
|
|
|
@node Basic Scheduling Functions
|
|
@subsection Basic Scheduling Functions
|
|
|
|
This section describes functions in the GNU C library for setting the
|
|
absolute priority and scheduling policy of a process.
|
|
|
|
@strong{Portability Note:} On systems that have the functions in this
|
|
section, the macro _POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING is defined in
|
|
@file{<unistd.h>}.
|
|
|
|
For the case that the scheduling policy is traditional scheduling, more
|
|
functions to fine tune the scheduling are in @ref{Traditional Scheduling}.
|
|
|
|
Don't try to make too much out of the naming and structure of these
|
|
functions. They don't match the concepts described in this manual
|
|
because the functions are as defined by POSIX.1b, but the implementation
|
|
on systems that use the GNU C library is the inverse of what the POSIX
|
|
structure contemplates. The POSIX scheme assumes that the primary
|
|
scheduling parameter is the scheduling policy and that the priority
|
|
value, if any, is a parameter of the scheduling policy. In the
|
|
implementation, though, the priority value is king and the scheduling
|
|
policy, if anything, only fine tunes the effect of that priority.
|
|
|
|
The symbols in this section are declared by including file @file{sched.h}.
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftp {Data Type} {struct sched_param}
|
|
This structure describes an absolute priority.
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item int sched_priority
|
|
absolute priority value
|
|
@end table
|
|
@end deftp
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_setscheduler (pid_t @var{pid}, int @var{policy}, const struct sched_param *@var{param})
|
|
|
|
This function sets both the absolute priority and the scheduling policy
|
|
for a process.
|
|
|
|
It assigns the absolute priority value given by @var{param} and the
|
|
scheduling policy @var{policy} to the process with Process ID @var{pid},
|
|
or the calling process if @var{pid} is zero. If @var{policy} is
|
|
negative, @code{sched_setschedule} keeps the existing scheduling policy.
|
|
|
|
The following macros represent the valid values for @var{policy}:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item SCHED_OTHER
|
|
Traditional Scheduling
|
|
@item SCHED_FIFO
|
|
First In First Out
|
|
@item SCHED_RR
|
|
Round Robin
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@c The Linux kernel code (in sched.c) actually reschedules the process,
|
|
@c but it puts it at the head of the run queue, so I'm not sure just what
|
|
@c the effect is, but it must be subtle.
|
|
|
|
On success, the return value is @code{0}. Otherwise, it is @code{-1}
|
|
and @code{ERRNO} is set accordingly. The @code{errno} values specific
|
|
to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EPERM
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
The calling process does not have @code{CAP_SYS_NICE} permission and
|
|
@var{policy} is not @code{SCHED_OTHER} (or it's negative and the
|
|
existing policy is not @code{SCHED_OTHER}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The calling process does not have @code{CAP_SYS_NICE} permission and its
|
|
owner is not the target process' owner. I.e. the effective uid of the
|
|
calling process is neither the effective nor the real uid of process
|
|
@var{pid}.
|
|
@c We need a cross reference to the capabilities section, when written.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@item ESRCH
|
|
There is no process with pid @var{pid} and @var{pid} is not zero.
|
|
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
@var{policy} does not identify an existing scheduling policy.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The absolute priority value identified by *@var{param} is outside the
|
|
valid range for the scheduling policy @var{policy} (or the existing
|
|
scheduling policy if @var{policy} is negative) or @var{param} is
|
|
null. @code{sched_get_priority_max} and @code{sched_get_priority_min}
|
|
tell you what the valid range is.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@var{pid} is negative.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_getscheduler (pid_t @var{pid})
|
|
|
|
This function returns the scheduling policy assigned to the process with
|
|
Process ID (pid) @var{pid}, or the calling process if @var{pid} is zero.
|
|
|
|
The return value is the scheduling policy. See
|
|
@code{sched_setscheduler} for the possible values.
|
|
|
|
If the function fails, the return value is instead @code{-1} and
|
|
@code{errno} is set accordingly.
|
|
|
|
The @code{errno} values specific to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
|
|
@item ESRCH
|
|
There is no process with pid @var{pid} and it is not zero.
|
|
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
@var{pid} is negative.
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
Note that this function is not an exact mate to @code{sched_setscheduler}
|
|
because while that function sets the scheduling policy and the absolute
|
|
priority, this function gets only the scheduling policy. To get the
|
|
absolute priority, use @code{sched_getparam}.
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_setparam (pid_t @var{pid}, const struct sched_param *@var{param})
|
|
|
|
This function sets a process' absolute priority.
|
|
|
|
It is functionally identical to @code{sched_setscheduler} with
|
|
@var{policy} = @code{-1}.
|
|
|
|
@c in fact, that's how it's implemented in Linux.
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_getparam (pid_t @var{pid}, const struct sched_param *@var{param})
|
|
|
|
This function returns a process' absolute priority.
|
|
|
|
@var{pid} is the Process ID (pid) of the process whose absolute priority
|
|
you want to know.
|
|
|
|
@var{param} is a pointer to a structure in which the function stores the
|
|
absolute priority of the process.
|
|
|
|
On success, the return value is @code{0}. Otherwise, it is @code{-1}
|
|
and @code{ERRNO} is set accordingly. The @code{errno} values specific
|
|
to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
|
|
@item ESRCH
|
|
There is no process with pid @var{pid} and it is not zero.
|
|
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
@var{pid} is negative.
|
|
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_get_priority_min (int *@var{policy});
|
|
|
|
This function returns the lowest absolute priority value that is
|
|
allowable for a process with scheduling policy @var{policy}.
|
|
|
|
On Linux, it is 0 for SCHED_OTHER and 1 for everything else.
|
|
|
|
On success, the return value is @code{0}. Otherwise, it is @code{-1}
|
|
and @code{ERRNO} is set accordingly. The @code{errno} values specific
|
|
to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
@var{policy} does not identify an existing scheduling policy.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_set_priority_max (int *@var{policy});
|
|
|
|
This function returns the highest absolute priority value that is
|
|
allowable for a process that with scheduling policy @var{policy}.
|
|
|
|
On Linux, it is 0 for SCHED_OTHER and 99 for everything else.
|
|
|
|
On success, the return value is @code{0}. Otherwise, it is @code{-1}
|
|
and @code{ERRNO} is set accordingly. The @code{errno} values specific
|
|
to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
@var{policy} does not identify an existing scheduling policy.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int sched_rr_get_interval (pid_t @var{pid}, struct timespec *@var{interval})
|
|
|
|
This function returns the length of the quantum (time slice) used with
|
|
the Round Robin scheduling policy, if it is used, for the process with
|
|
Process ID @var{pid}.
|
|
|
|
It returns the length of time as @var{interval}.
|
|
@c We need a cross-reference to where timespec is explained. But that
|
|
@c section doesn't exist yet, and the time chapter needs to be slightly
|
|
@c reorganized so there is a place to put it (which will be right next
|
|
@c to timeval, which is presently misplaced). 2000.05.07.
|
|
|
|
With a Linux kernel, the round robin time slice is always 150
|
|
microseconds, and @var{pid} need not even be a real pid.
|
|
|
|
The return value is @code{0} on success and in the pathological case
|
|
that it fails, the return value is @code{-1} and @code{errno} is set
|
|
accordingly. There is nothing specific that can go wrong with this
|
|
function, so there are no specific @code{errno} values.
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sched.h
|
|
@comment POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun sched_yield (void)
|
|
|
|
This function voluntarily gives up the process' claim on the CPU.
|
|
|
|
Technically, @code{sched_yield} causes the calling process to be made
|
|
immediately ready to run (as opposed to running, which is what it was
|
|
before). This means that if it has absolute priority higher than 0, it
|
|
gets pushed onto the tail of the queue of processes that share its
|
|
absolute priority and are ready to run, and it will run again when its
|
|
turn next arrives. If its absolute priority is 0, it is more
|
|
complicated, but still has the effect of yielding the CPU to other
|
|
processes.
|
|
|
|
If there are no other processes that share the calling process' absolute
|
|
priority, this function doesn't have any effect.
|
|
|
|
To the extent that the containing program is oblivious to what other
|
|
processes in the system are doing and how fast it executes, this
|
|
function appears as a no-op.
|
|
|
|
The return value is @code{0} on success and in the pathological case
|
|
that it fails, the return value is @code{-1} and @code{errno} is set
|
|
accordingly. There is nothing specific that can go wrong with this
|
|
function, so there are no specific @code{errno} values.
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@node Traditional Scheduling
|
|
@subsection Traditional Scheduling
|
|
@cindex scheduling, traditional
|
|
|
|
This section is about the scheduling among processes whose absolute
|
|
priority is 0. When the system hands out the scraps of CPU time that
|
|
are left over after the processes with higher absolulte priority have
|
|
taken all they want, the scheduling described herein determines who
|
|
among the great unwashed processes gets them.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Traditional Scheduling Intro::
|
|
* Traditional Scheduling Functions::
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Traditional Scheduling Intro
|
|
@subsubsection Introduction To Traditional Scheduling
|
|
|
|
Long before there was absolute priority (See @ref{Absolute Priority}),
|
|
Unix systems were scheduling the CPU using this system. When Posix came
|
|
in like the Romans and imposed absolute priorities to accomodate the
|
|
needs of realtime processing, it left the indigenous Absolute Priority
|
|
Zero processes to govern themselves by their own familiar scheduling
|
|
policy.
|
|
|
|
Indeed, absolute priorities higher than zero are not available on many
|
|
systems today and are not typically used when they are, being intended
|
|
mainly for computers that do realtime processing. So this section
|
|
describes the only scheduling many programmers need to be concerned
|
|
about.
|
|
|
|
But just to be clear about the scope of this scheduling: Any time a
|
|
process with a absolute priority of 0 and a process with an absolute
|
|
priority higher than 0 are ready to run at the same time, the one with
|
|
absolute priority 0 does not run. If it's already running when the
|
|
higher priority ready-to-run process comes into existence, it stops
|
|
immediately.
|
|
|
|
In addition to its absolute priority of zero, every process has another
|
|
priority, which we will refer to as "dynamic priority" because it changes
|
|
over time. The dynamic priority is meaningless for processes with
|
|
an absolute priority higher than zero.
|
|
|
|
The dynamic priority sometimes determines who gets the next turn on the
|
|
CPU. Sometimes it determines how long turns last. Sometimes it
|
|
determines whether a process can kick another off the CPU.
|
|
|
|
In Linux, the value is a combination of these things, but mostly it is
|
|
just determines the length of the time slice. The higher a process'
|
|
dynamic priority, the longer a shot it gets on the CPU when it gets one.
|
|
If it doesn't use up its time slice before giving up the CPU to do
|
|
something like wait for I/O, it is favored for getting the CPU back when
|
|
it's ready for it, to finish out its time slice. Other than that,
|
|
selection of processes for new time slices is basically round robin.
|
|
But the scheduler does throw a bone to the low priority processes: A
|
|
process' dynamic priority rises every time it is snubbed in the
|
|
scheduling process. In Linux, even the fat kid gets to play.
|
|
|
|
The fluctuation of a process' dynamic priority is regulated by another
|
|
value: The ``nice'' value. The nice value is an integer, usually in the
|
|
range -20 to 20, and represents an upper limit on a process' dynamic
|
|
priority. The higher the nice number, the lower that limit.
|
|
|
|
On a typical Linux system, for example, a process with a nice value of
|
|
20 can get only 10 milliseconds on the CPU at a time, whereas a process
|
|
with a nice value of -20 can achieve a high enough priority to get 400
|
|
milliseconds.
|
|
|
|
The idea of the nice value is deferential courtesy. In the beginning,
|
|
in the Unix garden of Eden, all processes shared equally in the bounty
|
|
of the computer system. But not all processes really need the same
|
|
share of CPU time, so the nice value gave a courteous process the
|
|
ability to refuse its equal share of CPU time that others might prosper.
|
|
Hence, the higher a process' nice value, the nicer the process is.
|
|
(Then a snake came along and offered some process a negative nice value
|
|
and the system became the crass resource allocation system we know
|
|
today).
|
|
|
|
Dynamic priorities tend upward and downward with an objective of
|
|
smoothing out allocation of CPU time and giving quick response time to
|
|
infrequent requests. But they never exceed their nice limits, so on a
|
|
heavily loaded CPU, the nice value effectively determines how fast a
|
|
process runs.
|
|
|
|
In keeping with the socialistic heritage of Unix process priority, a
|
|
process begins life with the same nice value as its parent process and
|
|
can raise it at will. A process can also raise the nice value of any
|
|
other process owned by the same user (or effective user). But only a
|
|
privileged process can lower its nice value. A privileged process can
|
|
also raise or lower another process' nice value.
|
|
|
|
GNU C Library functions for getting and setting nice values are described in
|
|
@xref{Traditional Scheduling Functions}.
|
|
|
|
@node Traditional Scheduling Functions
|
|
@subsubsection Functions For Traditional Scheduling
|
|
|
|
@pindex sys/resource.h
|
|
This section describes how you can read and set the nice value of a
|
|
process. All these symbols are declared in @file{sys/resource.h}.
|
|
|
|
The function and macro names are defined by POSIX, and refer to
|
|
"priority," but the functions actually have to do with nice values, as
|
|
the terms are used both in the manual and POSIX.
|
|
|
|
The range of valid nice values depends on the kernel, but typically it
|
|
runs from @code{-20} to @code{20}. A lower nice value corresponds to
|
|
higher priority for the process. These constants describe the range of
|
|
priority values:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item PRIO_MIN
|
|
@vindex PRIO_MIN
|
|
The lowest valid nice value.
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item PRIO_MAX
|
|
@vindex PRIO_MAX
|
|
The highest valid nice value.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD,POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int getpriority (int @var{class}, int @var{id})
|
|
Return the nice value of a set of processes; @var{class} and @var{id}
|
|
specify which ones (see below). If the processes specified do not all
|
|
have the same nice value, this returns the lowest value that any of them
|
|
has.
|
|
|
|
On success, the return value is @code{0}. Otherwise, it is @code{-1}
|
|
and @code{ERRNO} is set accordingly. The @code{errno} values specific
|
|
to this function are:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item ESRCH
|
|
The combination of @var{class} and @var{id} does not match any existing
|
|
process.
|
|
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
The value of @var{class} is not valid.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
If the return value is @code{-1}, it could indicate failure, or it could
|
|
be the nice value. The only way to make certain is to set @code{errno =
|
|
0} before calling @code{getpriority}, then use @code{errno != 0}
|
|
afterward as the criterion for failure.
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD,POSIX
|
|
@deftypefun int setpriority (int @var{class}, int @var{id}, int @var{niceval})
|
|
Set the nice value of a set of processes to @var{niceval}; @var{class}
|
|
and @var{id} specify which ones (see below).
|
|
|
|
The return value is the nice value on success, and @code{-1} on
|
|
failure. The following @code{errno} error condition are possible for
|
|
this function:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@item ESRCH
|
|
The combination of @var{class} and @var{id} does not match any existing
|
|
process.
|
|
|
|
@item EINVAL
|
|
The value of @var{class} is not valid.
|
|
|
|
@item EPERM
|
|
The call would set the nice value of a process which is owned by a different
|
|
user than the calling process (i.e. the target process' real or effective
|
|
uid does not match the calling process' effective uid) and the calling
|
|
process does not have @code{CAP_SYS_NICE} permission.
|
|
|
|
@item EACCES
|
|
The call would lower the process' nice value and the process does not have
|
|
@code{CAP_SYS_NICE} permission.
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|
|
The arguments @var{class} and @var{id} together specify a set of
|
|
processes in which you are interested. These are the possible values of
|
|
@var{class}:
|
|
|
|
@table @code
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item PRIO_PROCESS
|
|
@vindex PRIO_PROCESS
|
|
One particular process. The argument @var{id} is a process ID (pid).
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item PRIO_PGRP
|
|
@vindex PRIO_PGRP
|
|
All the processes in a particular process group. The argument @var{id} is
|
|
a process group ID (pgid).
|
|
|
|
@comment sys/resource.h
|
|
@comment BSD
|
|
@item PRIO_USER
|
|
@vindex PRIO_USER
|
|
All the processes owned by a particular user (i.e. whose real uid
|
|
indicates the user). The argument @var{id} is a user ID (uid).
|
|
@end table
|
|
|
|
If the argument @var{id} is 0, it stands for the calling process, its
|
|
process group, or its owner (real uid), according to @var{class}.
|
|
|
|
@c ??? I don't know where we should say this comes from.
|
|
@comment Unix
|
|
@comment dunno.h
|
|
@deftypefun int nice (int @var{increment})
|
|
Increment the nice value of the calling process by @var{increment}.
|
|
The return value is the same as for @code{setpriority}.
|
|
|
|
Here is an equivalent definition of @code{nice}:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
int
|
|
nice (int increment)
|
|
@{
|
|
int old = getpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0);
|
|
return setpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0, old + increment);
|
|
@}
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
@end deftypefun
|
|
|