glibc/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
Wilco Dijkstra d064591266 Further improve string bench timing
Further improve the timings of the string benchmarks.  Ensure most take
between 1 and 4 seconds to improve accuracy.  Overall time taken increases
by 35%.  Tested on AArch64.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>

	* benchtests/bench-math-inlines.c: Increase iterations.
	* benchtests/bench-memcmp.c: Likewise.
	* benchtests/bench-rawmemchr.c: Likewise.
	* benchtests/bench-strcmp.c: Likewise.
	* benchtests/bench-strcpy_chk.c: Likewise.
	* benchtests/bench-string.h (INNER_LOOP_ITERS8): Add define.
	(INNER_LOOP_ITERS_MEDIUM): Increase iterations.
	(INNER_LOOP_ITERS_SMALL): Likewise.
	* benchtests/bench-strncat.c: Increase iterations.
	* benchtests/bench-strncmp.c: Increase iterations.
	* benchtests/bench-strncpy.c: Reduce iterations for wide strings.
	* benchtests/bench-strrchr.c: Increase iterations.
	* benchtests/bench-strstr.c: Keep iterations unchanged.
	* benchtests/bench-strtod.c: Increase iterations.
2019-06-28 13:42:36 +01:00

314 lines
9.3 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

/* Measure strstr functions.
Copyright (C) 2013-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
Lesser General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#define MIN_PAGE_SIZE 131072
#define TEST_MAIN
#define TEST_NAME "strstr"
#include "bench-string.h"
static const char input[] =
"This manual is written with the assumption that you are at least "
"somewhat familiar with the C programming language and basic programming "
"concepts. Specifically, familiarity with ISO standard C (*note ISO "
"C::), rather than “traditional” pre-ISO C dialects, is assumed.\n"
" The GNU C Library includes several “header files”, each of which "
"provides definitions and declarations for a group of related facilities; "
"this information is used by the C compiler when processing your program. "
"For example, the header file stdio.h declares facilities for "
"performing input and output, and the header file string.h declares "
"string processing utilities. The organization of this manual generally "
"follows the same division as the header files.\n"
" If you are reading this manual for the first time, you should read "
"all of the introductory material and skim the remaining chapters. There "
"are a _lot_ of functions in the GNU C Library and its not realistic to "
"expect that you will be able to remember exactly _how_ to use each and "
"every one of them. Its more important to become generally familiar "
"with the kinds of facilities that the library provides, so that when you "
"are writing your programs you can recognize _when_ to make use of "
"library functions, and _where_ in this manual you can find more specific "
"information about them.\n";
/* Simple yet efficient strstr - for needles < 32 bytes it is 2-4 times
faster than the optimized twoway_strstr. */
static char *
basic_strstr (const char *s1, const char *s2)
{
size_t i;
int c = s2[0];
if (c == 0)
return (char*)s1;
for ( ; s1[0] != '\0'; s1++)
{
if (s1[0] != c)
continue;
for (i = 1; s2[i] != 0; i++)
if (s1[i] != s2[i])
break;
if (s2[i] == '\0')
return (char*)s1;
}
return NULL;
}
#define RETURN_TYPE char *
#define AVAILABLE(h, h_l, j, n_l) \
(((j) + (n_l) <= (h_l)) \
|| ((h_l) += __strnlen ((void*)((h) + (h_l)), (n_l) + 512), \
(j) + (n_l) <= (h_l)))
#define CHECK_EOL (1)
#define RET0_IF_0(a) if (!a) goto ret0
#define FASTSEARCH(S,C,N) (void*) strchr ((void*)(S), (C))
#define LONG_NEEDLE_THRESHOLD 32U
#define __strnlen strnlen
#include "string/str-two-way.h"
/* Optimized Two-way implementation from GLIBC 2.29. */
static char *
twoway_strstr (const char *haystack, const char *needle)
{
size_t needle_len; /* Length of NEEDLE. */
size_t haystack_len; /* Known minimum length of HAYSTACK. */
/* Handle empty NEEDLE special case. */
if (needle[0] == '\0')
return (char *) haystack;
/* Skip until we find the first matching char from NEEDLE. */
haystack = strchr (haystack, needle[0]);
if (haystack == NULL || needle[1] == '\0')
return (char *) haystack;
/* Ensure HAYSTACK length is at least as long as NEEDLE length.
Since a match may occur early on in a huge HAYSTACK, use strnlen
and read ahead a few cachelines for improved performance. */
needle_len = strlen (needle);
haystack_len = __strnlen (haystack, needle_len + 256);
if (haystack_len < needle_len)
return NULL;
/* Check whether we have a match. This improves performance since we avoid
the initialization overhead of the two-way algorithm. */
if (memcmp (haystack, needle, needle_len) == 0)
return (char *) haystack;
/* Perform the search. Abstract memory is considered to be an array
of 'unsigned char' values, not an array of 'char' values. See
ISO C 99 section 6.2.6.1. */
if (needle_len < LONG_NEEDLE_THRESHOLD)
return two_way_short_needle ((const unsigned char *) haystack,
haystack_len,
(const unsigned char *) needle, needle_len);
return two_way_long_needle ((const unsigned char *) haystack, haystack_len,
(const unsigned char *) needle, needle_len);
}
typedef char *(*proto_t) (const char *, const char *);
IMPL (strstr, 1)
IMPL (twoway_strstr, 0)
IMPL (basic_strstr, 0)
static void
do_one_test (impl_t *impl, const char *s1, const char *s2, char *exp_result)
{
size_t i, iters = INNER_LOOP_ITERS_SMALL / 8;
timing_t start, stop, cur;
char *res;
TIMING_NOW (start);
for (i = 0; i < iters; ++i)
res = CALL (impl, s1, s2);
TIMING_NOW (stop);
TIMING_DIFF (cur, start, stop);
TIMING_PRINT_MEAN ((double) cur, (double) iters);
if (res != exp_result)
{
error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s %s %s", impl->name,
(res == NULL) ? "(null)" : res,
(exp_result == NULL) ? "(null)" : exp_result);
ret = 1;
}
}
static void
do_test (size_t align1, size_t align2, size_t len1, size_t len2,
int fail)
{
char *s1 = (char *) (buf1 + align1);
char *s2 = (char *) (buf2 + align2);
size_t size = sizeof (input) - 1;
size_t pos = (len1 + len2) % size;
char *ss2 = s2;
for (size_t l = len2; l > 0; l = l > size ? l - size : 0)
{
size_t t = l > size ? size : l;
if (pos + t <= size)
ss2 = mempcpy (ss2, input + pos, t);
else
{
ss2 = mempcpy (ss2, input + pos, size - pos);
ss2 = mempcpy (ss2, input, t - (size - pos));
}
}
s2[len2] = '\0';
char *ss1 = s1;
for (size_t l = len1; l > 0; l = l > size ? l - size : 0)
{
size_t t = l > size ? size : l;
memcpy (ss1, input, t);
ss1 += t;
}
if (!fail)
memcpy (s1 + len1 - len2, s2, len2);
s1[len1] = '\0';
/* Remove any accidental matches except for the last if !fail. */
for (ss1 = basic_strstr (s1, s2); ss1; ss1 = basic_strstr (ss1 + 1, s2))
if (fail || ss1 != s1 + len1 - len2)
++ss1[len2 / 2];
printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, alignment %2zd/%2zd, %s:",
len1, len2, align1, align2, fail ? "fail " : "found");
FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
do_one_test (impl, s1, s2, fail ? NULL : s1 + len1 - len2);
putchar ('\n');
}
/* Test needles which exhibit worst-case performance. This shows that
basic_strstr is quadratic and thus unsuitable for large needles.
On the other hand Two-way and skip table implementations are linear with
increasing needle sizes. The slowest cases of the two implementations are
within a factor of 2 on several different microarchitectures. */
static void
test_hard_needle (size_t ne_len, size_t hs_len)
{
char *ne = (char *) buf1;
char *hs = (char *) buf2;
/* Hard needle for strstr algorithm using skip table. This results in many
memcmp calls comparing most of the needle. */
{
memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
ne[ne_len] = '\0';
ne[ne_len - 14] = 'b';
memset (hs, 'a', hs_len);
for (size_t i = ne_len; i <= hs_len; i += ne_len)
{
hs[i-5] = 'b';
hs[i-62] = 'b';
}
printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 1:", hs_len, ne_len);
FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, NULL);
putchar ('\n');
}
/* 2nd hard needle for strstr algorithm using skip table. This results in
many memcmp calls comparing most of the needle. */
{
memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
ne[ne_len] = '\0';
ne[ne_len - 6] = 'b';
memset (hs, 'a', hs_len);
for (size_t i = ne_len; i <= hs_len; i += ne_len)
{
hs[i-5] = 'b';
hs[i-6] = 'b';
}
printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 2:", hs_len, ne_len);
FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, NULL);
putchar ('\n');
}
/* Hard needle for Two-way algorithm - the random input causes a large number
of branch mispredictions which significantly reduces performance on modern
micro architectures. */
{
for (int i = 0; i < hs_len; i++)
hs[i] = (rand () & 255) > 155 ? 'a' : 'b';
hs[hs_len] = 0;
memset (ne, 'a', ne_len);
ne[ne_len-2] = 'b';
ne[0] = 'b';
ne[ne_len] = 0;
printf ("Length %4zd/%3zd, complex needle 3:", hs_len, ne_len);
FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
do_one_test (impl, hs, ne, NULL);
putchar ('\n');
}
}
static int
test_main (void)
{
test_init ();
printf ("%23s", "");
FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
printf ("\t%s", impl->name);
putchar ('\n');
for (size_t hlen = 64; hlen <= 256; hlen += 32)
for (size_t klen = 1; klen <= 16; klen++)
{
do_test (1, 3, hlen, klen, 0);
do_test (0, 9, hlen, klen, 1);
}
for (size_t hlen = 256; hlen <= 65536; hlen *= 2)
for (size_t klen = 16; klen <= 256; klen *= 2)
{
do_test (1, 11, hlen, klen, 0);
do_test (14, 5, hlen, klen, 1);
}
test_hard_needle (64, 65536);
test_hard_needle (256, 65536);
test_hard_needle (1024, 65536);
return ret;
}
#include <support/test-driver.c>