AuroraMiddleware/gtk
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk.git synced 2024-12-27 14:10:30 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
671daea262
gtk/testsuite/css/nodes/scale.nodes

56 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

node tests: Update expected output The printing of css nodes has changed and the window is visible now.
2020-01-17 22:07:46 +00:00
window.background:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
box#scales.vertical:dir(ltr)
scale.horizontal:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
value.top:dir(ltr)
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
slider:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
scale.horizontal:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
value.bottom:dir(ltr)
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
slider:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
scale.horizontal:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
trough:dir(ltr)
fill.top:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
slider:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
scale.horizontal:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.bottom:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
slider:dir(ltr)
scale css node test: Adapt to changes The style classes are reflected in the output here.
2016-05-19 16:25:52 +00:00
scale.horizontal.marks-before:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
marks.top:dir(ltr)
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
label:dir(ltr)
indicator:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
label:dir(ltr)
indicator:dir(ltr)
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
slider:dir(ltr)
node tests: Update expected output The printing of css nodes has changed and the window is visible now.
2020-01-17 22:07:46 +00:00
scale.horizontal.marks-after.marks-before:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
marks.top:dir(ltr)
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
label:dir(ltr)
indicator:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
marks.bottom:dir(ltr)
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
indicator:dir(ltr)
label:dir(ltr)
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
testsuite: Update expected results for scale changes
2017-11-05 05:58:05 +00:00
slider:dir(ltr)
scale: Rearrange child widgets Always keep the order: - [value] - [marks.top] - [marks.bottom] - trough Which makes sense given the rendering order. Slider should be drawn after the marks. Makes it possible to simply remove the custom snapshot implementations in scale and range. And Adwaita does not depend on the node order anyway.
2020-06-26 06:00:04 +00:00
scale.horizontal.marks-after:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
marks.bottom:dir(ltr)
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
indicator:dir(ltr)
label:dir(ltr)
Add a css node test for scales
2016-03-25 17:12:00 +00:00
mark:dir(ltr)
scale: Fix css node ordering and expected results Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but had a gadget before. Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order specified in the GtkScale does, i.e. ├── mark ├── [label] ╰── indicator for marks at the top of the scale and ├── mark ├── indicator ╰── [label] For marks at the bottom of the scale.
2017-05-22 12:15:39 +00:00
indicator:dir(ltr)
label:dir(ltr)
scale: Rearrange child widgets Always keep the order: - [value] - [marks.top] - [marks.bottom] - trough Which makes sense given the rendering order. Slider should be drawn after the marks. Makes it possible to simply remove the custom snapshot implementations in scale and range. And Adwaita does not depend on the node order anyway.
2020-06-26 06:00:04 +00:00
trough:dir(ltr)
highlight.top:dir(ltr)
slider:dir(ltr)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink