2008-07-01 22:57:50 +00:00
|
|
|
/* GDK - The GIMP Drawing Kit
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1995-1997 Peter Mattis, Spencer Kimball and Josh MacDonald
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
2000-07-26 11:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
|
|
|
|
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
2000-07-26 11:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2000-07-26 11:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
2012-02-27 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
* License along with this library. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
1999-02-24 07:37:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2000-07-26 11:33:08 +00:00
|
|
|
* Modified by the GTK+ Team and others 1997-2000. See the AUTHORS
|
1999-02-24 07:37:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* file for a list of people on the GTK+ Team. See the ChangeLog
|
|
|
|
* files for a list of changes. These files are distributed with
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
* GTK+ at ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/.
|
1999-02-24 07:37:18 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-22 14:28:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
2002-10-03 20:53:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-11 05:14:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkdisplayprivate.h"
|
2018-07-02 11:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkdragprivate.h"
|
2018-05-22 13:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkdropprivate.h"
|
2021-09-24 18:14:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkeventsprivate.h"
|
2022-09-24 03:33:42 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <glib/gi18n-lib.h>
|
2020-04-05 15:29:12 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkkeysprivate.h"
|
2021-09-24 18:14:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkkeysyms.h"
|
2022-09-24 03:23:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "gdkprivate.h"
|
2010-07-09 00:34:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <gobject/gvaluecollector.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-15 02:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <math.h>
|
1998-12-24 19:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-26 19:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* GdkEvent: (ref-func gdk_event_ref) (unref-func gdk_event_unref)
|
2017-12-26 19:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* `GdkEvent`s are immutable data structures, created by GDK to
|
|
|
|
* represent windowing system events.
|
2021-02-20 15:26:17 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* In GTK applications the events are handled automatically by toplevel
|
|
|
|
* widgets and passed on to the event controllers of appropriate widgets,
|
|
|
|
* so using `GdkEvent` and its related API is rarely needed.
|
2017-12-26 19:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkEventSequence:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* `GdkEventSequence` is an opaque type representing a sequence
|
2017-12-26 19:39:24 +00:00
|
|
|
* of related touch events.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2010-11-15 18:15:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
value_event_init (GValue *value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
value->data[0].v_pointer = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
value_event_free_value (GValue *value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (value->data[0].v_pointer != NULL)
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (value->data[0].v_pointer);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
value_event_copy_value (const GValue *src,
|
|
|
|
GValue *dst)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (src->data[0].v_pointer != NULL)
|
|
|
|
dst->data[0].v_pointer = gdk_event_ref (src->data[0].v_pointer);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
dst->data[0].v_pointer = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gpointer
|
|
|
|
value_event_peek_pointer (const GValue *value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return value->data[0].v_pointer;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static char *
|
|
|
|
value_event_collect_value (GValue *value,
|
|
|
|
guint n_collect_values,
|
|
|
|
GTypeCValue *collect_values,
|
|
|
|
guint collect_flags)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = collect_values[0].v_pointer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (event == NULL)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
value->data[0].v_pointer = NULL;
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (event->parent_instance.g_class == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return g_strconcat ("invalid unclassed GdkEvent pointer for "
|
|
|
|
"value type '",
|
|
|
|
G_VALUE_TYPE_NAME (value),
|
|
|
|
"'",
|
|
|
|
NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
value->data[0].v_pointer = gdk_event_ref (event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-24 18:40:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static char *
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
value_event_lcopy_value (const GValue *value,
|
|
|
|
guint n_collect_values,
|
|
|
|
GTypeCValue *collect_values,
|
|
|
|
guint collect_flags)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent **event_p = collect_values[0].v_pointer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (event_p == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return g_strconcat ("value location for '",
|
|
|
|
G_VALUE_TYPE_NAME (value),
|
|
|
|
"' passed as NULL",
|
|
|
|
NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (value->data[0].v_pointer == NULL)
|
|
|
|
*event_p = NULL;
|
|
|
|
else if (collect_flags & G_VALUE_NOCOPY_CONTENTS)
|
|
|
|
*event_p = value->data[0].v_pointer;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
*event_p = gdk_event_ref (value->data[0].v_pointer);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_finalize (GdkEvent *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->surface);
|
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->device);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_type_free_instance ((GTypeInstance *) self);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_real_get_state (GdkEvent *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_real_get_position (GdkEvent *self,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
*x = NAN;
|
|
|
|
*y = NAN;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_real_get_sequence (GdkEvent *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_real_get_tool (GdkEvent *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_real_get_axes (GdkEvent *self,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_class_init (GdkEventClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
klass->finalize = gdk_event_finalize;
|
|
|
|
klass->get_state = gdk_event_real_get_state;
|
|
|
|
klass->get_position = gdk_event_real_get_position;
|
|
|
|
klass->get_sequence = gdk_event_real_get_sequence;
|
|
|
|
klass->get_tool = gdk_event_real_get_tool;
|
|
|
|
klass->get_axes = gdk_event_real_get_axes;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_init (GdkEvent *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_ref_count_init (&self->ref_count);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_type (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-11-19 03:58:09 +00:00
|
|
|
static gsize event_type__volatile;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_once_init_enter (&event_type__volatile))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
static const GTypeFundamentalInfo finfo = {
|
|
|
|
(G_TYPE_FLAG_CLASSED |
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FLAG_INSTANTIATABLE |
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FLAG_DERIVABLE |
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FLAG_DEEP_DERIVABLE),
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const GTypeValueTable value_table = {
|
|
|
|
value_event_init,
|
|
|
|
value_event_free_value,
|
|
|
|
value_event_copy_value,
|
|
|
|
value_event_peek_pointer,
|
|
|
|
"p",
|
|
|
|
value_event_collect_value,
|
|
|
|
"p",
|
|
|
|
value_event_lcopy_value,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const GTypeInfo event_info = {
|
|
|
|
/* Class */
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkEventClass),
|
|
|
|
(GBaseInitFunc) NULL,
|
|
|
|
(GBaseFinalizeFunc) NULL,
|
|
|
|
(GClassInitFunc) gdk_event_class_init,
|
|
|
|
(GClassFinalizeFunc) NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Instance */
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkEvent),
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
(GInstanceInitFunc) gdk_event_init,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* GValue */
|
|
|
|
&value_table,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType event_type =
|
|
|
|
g_type_register_fundamental (g_type_fundamental_next (),
|
|
|
|
g_intern_static_string ("GdkEvent"),
|
|
|
|
&event_info, &finfo,
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FLAG_ABSTRACT);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_once_init_leave (&event_type__volatile, event_type);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return event_type__volatile;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* GdkEventTypeInfo:
|
|
|
|
* @instance_size: the size of the instance of a GdkEvent subclass
|
|
|
|
* @instance_init: (nullable): the function to initialize the instance data
|
|
|
|
* @finalize: (nullable): the function to free the instance data
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @get_state: (nullable): the function to retrieve the `GdkModifierType`:w
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* associated to the event
|
|
|
|
* @get_position: (nullable): the function to retrieve the event coordinates
|
|
|
|
* @get_sequence: (nullable): the function to retrieve the event sequence
|
|
|
|
* @get_tool: (nullable): the function to retrieve the event's device tool
|
|
|
|
* @get_axes: (nullable): the function to retrieve the event's axes
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* A structure used when registering a new GdkEvent type.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
gsize instance_size;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void (* instance_init) (GdkEvent *event);
|
|
|
|
void (* finalize) (GdkEvent *event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType (* get_state) (GdkEvent *event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean (* get_position) (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *(* get_sequence) (GdkEvent *event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *(* get_tool) (GdkEvent *event);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean (* get_axes) (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes);
|
|
|
|
} GdkEventTypeInfo;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_generic_class_init (gpointer g_class,
|
|
|
|
gpointer class_data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkEventTypeInfo *info = class_data;
|
|
|
|
GdkEventClass *event_class = g_class;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Optional */
|
|
|
|
if (info->finalize != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->finalize = info->finalize;
|
|
|
|
if (info->get_state != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->get_state = info->get_state;
|
|
|
|
if (info->get_position != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->get_position = info->get_position;
|
|
|
|
if (info->get_sequence != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->get_sequence = info->get_sequence;
|
|
|
|
if (info->get_tool != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->get_tool = info->get_tool;
|
|
|
|
if (info->get_axes != NULL)
|
|
|
|
event_class->get_axes = info->get_axes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_free (info);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GType
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_type_register_static (const char *type_name,
|
|
|
|
const GdkEventTypeInfo *type_info)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GTypeInfo info;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
info.class_size = sizeof (GdkEventClass);
|
|
|
|
info.base_init = NULL;
|
|
|
|
info.base_finalize = NULL;
|
|
|
|
info.class_init = gdk_event_generic_class_init;
|
|
|
|
info.class_finalize = NULL;
|
2021-02-04 19:16:02 +00:00
|
|
|
info.class_data = g_memdup2 (type_info, sizeof (GdkEventTypeInfo));
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
info.instance_size = type_info->instance_size;
|
|
|
|
info.n_preallocs = 0;
|
|
|
|
info.instance_init = (GInstanceInitFunc) type_info->instance_init;
|
|
|
|
info.value_table = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return g_type_register_static (GDK_TYPE_EVENT, type_name, &info, 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Map GdkEventType to the appropriate GType */
|
|
|
|
static GType gdk_event_types[GDK_EVENT_LAST];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @ETYPE: a `GdkEvent`Type
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Associates a `GdkEvent` type with the given `GdkEvent`Type enumeration.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This macro can only be used with %GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT(ETYPE) { gdk_event_types[ETYPE] = gdk_define_event_type_id; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE:
|
|
|
|
* @TypeName: the type name, in camel case
|
|
|
|
* @type_name: the type name, in snake case
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @type_info: the address of the `GdkEvent`TypeInfo for the event type
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @_C_: custom code to call after registering the event type
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Registers a new `GdkEvent` subclass with the given @TypeName and @type_info.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Similarly to %G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE, this macro will generate a `get_type()`
|
|
|
|
* function that registers the event type.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* You can specify code to be run after the type registration; the `GType` of
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* the event is available in the `gdk_define_event_type_id` variable.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE(TypeName, type_name, type_info, _C_) \
|
|
|
|
GType \
|
|
|
|
type_name ## _get_type (void) \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
2020-11-19 03:58:09 +00:00
|
|
|
static gsize gdk_define_event_type_id__volatile; \
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (g_once_init_enter (&gdk_define_event_type_id__volatile)) \
|
|
|
|
{ \
|
|
|
|
GType gdk_define_event_type_id = \
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_type_register_static (g_intern_static_string (#TypeName), type_info); \
|
|
|
|
{ _C_ } \
|
|
|
|
g_once_init_leave (&gdk_define_event_type_id__volatile, gdk_define_event_type_id); \
|
|
|
|
} \
|
|
|
|
return gdk_define_event_type_id__volatile; \
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define GDK_EVENT_SUPER(event) \
|
|
|
|
((GdkEventClass *) g_type_class_peek (g_type_parent (G_TYPE_FROM_INSTANCE (event))))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_alloc:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event_type: the `GdkEvent`Type to allocate
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @surface: (nullable): the `GdkSurface` of the event
|
|
|
|
* @device: (nullable): the `GdkDevice` of the event
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @time_: the event serial
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Allocates a `GdkEvent` for the given @event_type, and sets its
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* common fields with the given parameters.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer full): the newly allocated `GdkEvent` instance
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static gpointer
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_alloc (GdkEventType event_type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time_)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_assert (event_type >= GDK_DELETE && event_type < GDK_EVENT_LAST);
|
|
|
|
g_assert (gdk_event_types[event_type] != G_TYPE_INVALID);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = (GdkEvent *) g_type_create_instance (gdk_event_types[event_type]);
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-23 00:48:58 +00:00
|
|
|
if (GDK_DEBUG_CHECK (EVENTS))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
char *str = g_enum_to_string (GDK_TYPE_EVENT_TYPE, event_type);
|
|
|
|
gdk_debug_message ("Allocating a new %s for event type %s",
|
|
|
|
g_type_name (gdk_event_types[event_type]), str);
|
|
|
|
g_free (str);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
event->event_type = event_type;
|
|
|
|
event->surface = surface != NULL ? g_object_ref (surface) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
event->device = device != NULL ? g_object_ref (device) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
event->time = time_;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-26 02:39:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if (device != NULL && time_ != GDK_CURRENT_TIME)
|
|
|
|
gdk_device_set_timestamp (device, time_);
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return event;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_init_types_once (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_BUTTON_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_CROSSING_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_DELETE_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_DND_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_FOCUS_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_GRAB_BROKEN_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_KEY_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_MOTION_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_PAD_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_PROXIMITY_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_SCROLL_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_TOUCH_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
g_type_ensure (GDK_TYPE_TOUCHPAD_EVENT);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_init_types:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Initializes all GdkEvent types.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_init_types (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-11-19 03:58:09 +00:00
|
|
|
static gsize event_types__volatile;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_once_init_enter (&event_types__volatile))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gboolean initialized = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_init_types_once ();
|
|
|
|
initialized = TRUE;
|
2017-10-25 13:46:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_once_init_leave (&event_types__volatile, initialized);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-25 11:23:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG
|
2020-02-20 22:13:21 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
check_event_sanity (GdkEvent *event)
|
2010-12-02 09:59:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (event->device != NULL &&
|
|
|
|
gdk_surface_get_display (event->surface) != gdk_device_get_display (event->device))
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
char *type = g_enum_to_string (GDK_TYPE_EVENT_TYPE, event->event_type);
|
2020-02-20 22:13:21 +00:00
|
|
|
g_warning ("Event of type %s with mismatched device display", type);
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
g_free (type);
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-13 11:50:34 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
_gdk_event_emit (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!check_event_sanity (event))
|
2024-01-13 11:50:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2019-05-01 20:39:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-06-29 17:34:14 +00:00
|
|
|
if (gdk_drag_handle_source_event (event))
|
2024-01-13 11:50:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2016-01-08 20:22:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-01-13 11:50:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return gdk_surface_handle_event (event);
|
2010-12-02 09:59:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
/*********************************************
|
|
|
|
* Functions for maintaining the event queue *
|
|
|
|
*********************************************/
|
|
|
|
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Make gdkx.h the only installed header from gdk/x11. All structures in
Fri Sep 7 11:51:44 2001 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
Make gdkx.h the only installed header from gdk/x11.
All structures in gdk/x11 are opaque.
* gdk/x11/Makefile.am gdk/x11/gdkx.h gdk/x11/gdkprivate-x11.h:
Don't install gdk{drawable,pixmap,window}-x11.h.
* gdk/x11/{gdkcolormap-x11.c, gdkfont-x11.c, gdkx.h, gdkvisual-x11.c:
Move GdkColormapPrivateX11, GdkFontPrivateX GdkImagePrivateX11,
GdkVisualClass into C files.
* gdk/gdkpixmap-x11.[ch]: Make gdk_pixmap_impl_get_type() static.
* gdk/x11/{gdkcolor-x11.c, gdkcursor-x11.c, gdkdrawable-x11.c,
gdkfont-x11.c, gdkgc-x11.c, gdkx.h, gdkimage-x11,gdkvisual-x11.c}
Add public functions to replace previously exported direct
structure access.
gdk_x11_colormap_get_{xdisplay,xcolormap}
gdk_x11_cursor_get_{xdisplay,xcursor},
gdk_x11_drawable_get_{xdisplay,xcursor,gdk_x11_visual_get_xvisual,
gdk_x11_font_get_{xdisplay,xfont}, gdk_x11_image_get_{xdisplay,ximage},
gdk_x11_gc_get_{xdisplay,ximage}
* gdk/gdkprivate.h gdk/gdkinternals.h: Move GdkColorInfo,
GdkEventFilter, GdkClientFilter, GdkFontPrivate to gdkinternals.
Fix a number of variables and functions that were exported
"accidentally" from GDK.
* gdk/**.[ch]: gdk => _gdk for gdk_visual_init,
gdk_events_init, gdk_input_init, gdk_dnd_init, gdk_image_exit,
gdk_input_exit, gdk_windowing_exit, gdk_event_func, gdk_event_data,
gdk_event_notify, gdk_queued_events, gdk_queued_tail,
gdk_event_new, gdk_events_queue, gdk_events_unqueue,
gdk_event_queue_find_first, gdk_event_queue_remove_link,
gdk_event_queue_append, gdk_event_button_generate,
gdk_debug_flags, gdk_default_filters, gdk_parent_root.
* gdk/x11/{gdkevents-x11.c, gdkglobals-x11.c, gdkimage-x11.c,
gdkmain-x11.c, gdkprivate-x11.h, gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c}:
gdk => _gdk for gdk_event_mask_table, gkd_nevent_masks,
gdk_wm_window_protocols, gdk_leader_window, gdk_xgrab_window,
gdk_use_xshm, gdk_input_ignore_core.
* gdk/x11/xsettings-common.h (xsettings_list_insert): Add
#defines to namespace functions into the private _gdk_
namespace.
* gdk/gdkwindow.[ch] gdk/x11/gdkx.h: Add gdk_get_default_root_window ()
to replace gdk_parent_root exported variable. Adjust and
deprecate GDK_ROOT_PARENT().
* demos/{testpixbuf-drawable.c,testpixbuf-save.c}: Fix
GDK_ROOT_PARENT usage, remove includes of port-specific
headers.
* gdk/{win32,x11,fb}/gdkinput*.[ch]: s/gdk/_gdk/ for
_gdk_input_gxid_host, _gdk_input_gxid_port, _gdk_input_ignore_core,
gdk_input_devices, _gdk_input_windows, gdk_init_input_core.
* gdk/x11/{gdkevents-x11.,c gdkglobals-x11.c, gdkmain-x11.c}
docs/Changes-2.0.txt: Remove gdk_wm_protocols,
gdk_wm_delete_window functions, gdk_wm_take_focus,
use gdk_atom_intern() instead.
* gdk/linux-fb/{gdkselection-fb.c, gdkmain-fb.c, gdkprivatefb.h}
gdk/win32/{gdkselection-win32.c, gdkmgdkwin32.h, gdkprivate-win32.h}
gdk/x11/{gdkselection-x11.c gdkx.h, gtkprivate-x11.h}
gtk/gtkselection.c
Unexport gdk_selection_property, just use
gdk_atom_intern ("GDK_SELECTION").
* gdk/x11/{gdkprivate-x11.h,gdkdrawable-x11h,gdkgc-x11.c,gdkx.h}:
Unexport gdk_drawable_impl_x11_get_type, gdk_gc_x11_get_type,
GDK_GC_X11 cast macros, GdkGCX11 structures, GdkCursorPrivate,
GdkVisualprivate, gdk_x11_gc_flush.
Make a number of public exports of variables into functions
to increase encapsulation.
* gdk/gdkinternals.h gdk/gdkinput.h gdk/gdkevents.h
gdk/linux-fb/gdkmouse-fb.c: gdk_core_pointer => _gdk_core_pointer,
move to gdkinternals.h. Add gdk_device_get_core_pointer ().
* gdk/gdkprivate.h gdk/gdkpango.c gdk/gdkinternals.h
docs/Changes-2.0.txt: Unexport gdk_parent_root, gdk_error_code,
gdk_error_warnings.
* gdk/x11/{gdkcolormap-x11.c, gdkmain-x11.c, gdkx.h}
docs/Changes-2.0.txt:
s/gdk_screen/_gdk_screen/, add gdk_x11_get_default_screen()
s/gdk_root_window/_gdk_root_window/, add gdk_x11_get_default_root_xwindow()
Add gdk_x11_get_default_xdisplay().
* gdk/gdk.h gdk/gdk.c linux-fb/gdkfb.h linux-fb/gdkglobals-fb.c
win32/gdkwin32.h x11/gdkglobals-x11.c gdk/x11/gdkmain-x11.c
gdk/x11/gdkx.h: gdk/gdk.def: Add gdk_get/set_program_class,
Don't export gdk_progclass, move --class command line
option and handling to common portion of GDK.
Miscellaneous fixes:
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_set_icon_list): Fix
g_return_val_if_fail that should have been g_return_if_fail.
* gdk/gdkinternals.h gdk/gdkprivate.h: Move
gdk_synthesize_window_state() to the semi-public gdkprivate.h.
* gtk/gtkdnd.c (_gtk_drag_source_handle_event): Remove uneeded
X11 dependency.
* gdk/linux-fb/gdkmain-fb.c gdk/win32/gdkmain-win32.c gdk/TODO:
Remove unused gdk_key_repeat_disable/restore.
* linux-fb/gdkglobals-fb.c win32/gdkglobals-win32.c
x11/gdkglobals-x11.c x11/gdkprivate-x11.h gdk/gdk.def:
Remove unused gdk_null_window_warnings variable.
* gdk/Makefile.am (DIST_SUBDIRS) nanox/*: cvs remove nanox;
it can be retrieved from the repository; it is too far
from functional to be worth having people check out;
it would be easier to start from scratch, I suspect.
* gdk/x11/gdkpixmap-x11.c: Fix lvalue usage of GDK_PIXMAP_XID().
* gdk/x11/gdkkeys-x11.c gdk/gdkrgb.c gdk/gdkwindow.c
gdk/x11/gdkpango-x11.c gdk/x11/gdkselection-x11.c:
Fix some accidentally global variables and unused global variables.
* gdk/x11/gdkkeys-x11.c gdk/gdkrgb.c gdk/gdkwindow.c
gdk/x11/gdkpango-x11.c gdk/x11/gdkselection-x11.c:
Fix some accidentally global variables and unused global variables.
Add some space for future expansion to multihead.
* gdk/gdkdrawable.h: Add four reserved function pointers
for future expansion of GdkDrawableClass.
* gtk/gtkwindow.h gtk/gtkinvisible.h: Add reserved pointer
where we can put a GdkScreen * later.
2001-09-07 21:50:20 +00:00
|
|
|
* _gdk_event_queue_find_first:
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @display: a `GdkDisplay`
|
|
|
|
*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* Find the first event on the queue that is not still
|
|
|
|
* being filled in.
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: (nullable): Pointer to the list node for that event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
1999-11-08 20:14:59 +00:00
|
|
|
GList*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_find_first (GdkDisplay *display)
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
GList *tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
GList *pending_motion = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-11 23:04:34 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean paused = display->event_pause_count > 0;
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
tmp_list = g_queue_peek_head_link (&display->queued_events);
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
while (tmp_list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-10-11 06:42:41 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = tmp_list->data;
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((event->flags & GDK_EVENT_PENDING) == 0 &&
|
|
|
|
(!paused || (event->flags & GDK_EVENT_FLUSHED) != 0))
|
2013-09-28 16:06:53 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pending_motion)
|
|
|
|
return pending_motion;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-20 19:51:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((event->event_type == GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY ||
|
|
|
|
(event->event_type == GDK_SCROLL && gdk_scroll_event_get_direction (event) == GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH)) &&
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
(event->flags & GDK_EVENT_FLUSHED) == 0)
|
2013-09-28 16:06:53 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motion = tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
}
|
1999-01-21 06:24:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 00:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
tmp_list = tmp_list->next;
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* _gdk_event_queue_append:
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @display: a `GdkDisplay`
|
|
|
|
* @event: Event to append
|
|
|
|
*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* Appends an event onto the tail of the event queue.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the newly appended list node.
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
GList *
|
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_append (GdkDisplay *display,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
g_queue_push_tail (&display->queued_events, event);
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
return g_queue_peek_tail_link (&display->queued_events);
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-08-14 01:47:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* _gdk_event_queue_remove_link:
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @display: a `GdkDisplay`
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* @node: node to remove
|
2020-08-14 01:47:54 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* Removes a specified list node from the event queue.
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
1999-11-08 20:14:59 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_remove_link (GdkDisplay *display,
|
|
|
|
GList *node)
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
g_queue_unlink (&display->queued_events, node);
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-14 01:47:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* _gdk_event_unqueue:
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* @display: a `GdkDisplay`
|
2020-08-14 01:47:54 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
* Removes and returns the first event from the event
|
|
|
|
* queue that is not still being filled in.
|
2020-08-14 01:47:54 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (nullable): the event
|
2021-05-21 00:45:06 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent*
|
|
|
|
_gdk_event_unqueue (GdkDisplay *display)
|
1999-01-12 23:27:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2002-04-25 22:29:14 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = NULL;
|
|
|
|
GList *tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmp_list = _gdk_event_queue_find_first (display);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (tmp_list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
event = tmp_list->data;
|
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_remove_link (display, tmp_list);
|
|
|
|
g_list_free_1 (tmp_list);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return event;
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the last N events in the event queue are smooth scroll events
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* for the same surface, the same device and the same scroll unit,
|
|
|
|
* combine them into one.
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* We give the remaining event a history with N items, and deltas
|
|
|
|
* that are the sum over the history entries.
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_queue_handle_scroll_compression (GdkDisplay *display)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GList *l;
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface = NULL;
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device = NULL;
|
|
|
|
GList *scrolls = NULL;
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
GArray *history = NULL;
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollUnit scroll_unit = GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL;
|
|
|
|
gboolean scroll_unit_defined = FALSE;
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTimeCoord hist;
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l = g_queue_peek_tail_link (&display->queued_events);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (l)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = l->data;
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *scroll_event = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (event->flags & GDK_EVENT_PENDING)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (event->event_type != GDK_SCROLL ||
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_direction (event) != GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (surface != NULL &&
|
|
|
|
surface != event->surface)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (device != NULL &&
|
|
|
|
device != event->device)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (scroll_unit_defined &&
|
|
|
|
scroll_unit != scroll_event->unit)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
surface = event->surface;
|
|
|
|
device = event->device;
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
scroll_unit = scroll_event->unit;
|
|
|
|
scroll_unit_defined = TRUE;
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
scrolls = l;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l = l->prev;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (scrolls && scrolls->next != NULL)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = scrolls->data;
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
GList *next = scrolls->next;
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
double dx, dy;
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean inherited = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!history && ((GdkScrollEvent *)event)->history)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
history = ((GdkScrollEvent *)event)->history;
|
|
|
|
((GdkScrollEvent *)event)->history = NULL;
|
|
|
|
inherited = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!history)
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
history = g_array_new (FALSE, TRUE, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord));
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!inherited)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_deltas (event, &dx, &dy);
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
memset (&hist, 0, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord));
|
|
|
|
hist.time = gdk_event_get_time (event);
|
|
|
|
hist.flags = GDK_AXIS_FLAG_DELTA_X | GDK_AXIS_FLAG_DELTA_Y;
|
|
|
|
hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_X] = dx;
|
|
|
|
hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_Y] = dy;
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
g_array_append_val (history, hist);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (event);
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
g_queue_delete_link (&display->queued_events, scrolls);
|
|
|
|
scrolls = next;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (scrolls && history)
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *old_event, *event;
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
double dx, dy;
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
old_event = scrolls->data;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_deltas (old_event, &dx, &dy);
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset (&hist, 0, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord));
|
|
|
|
hist.time = gdk_event_get_time (old_event);
|
|
|
|
hist.flags = GDK_AXIS_FLAG_DELTA_X | GDK_AXIS_FLAG_DELTA_Y;
|
|
|
|
hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_X] = dx;
|
|
|
|
hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_Y] = dy;
|
|
|
|
g_array_append_val (history, hist);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dx = dy = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < history->len; i++)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTimeCoord *val = &g_array_index (history, GdkTimeCoord, i);
|
|
|
|
dx += val->axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_X];
|
|
|
|
dy += val->axes[GDK_AXIS_DELTA_Y];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
event = gdk_scroll_event_new (surface,
|
|
|
|
device,
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_device_tool (old_event),
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_time (old_event),
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_modifier_state (old_event),
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
dx,
|
|
|
|
dy,
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_is_stop (old_event),
|
|
|
|
scroll_unit);
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
((GdkScrollEvent *)event)->history = history;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
g_queue_delete_link (&display->queued_events, scrolls);
|
|
|
|
g_queue_push_tail (&display->queued_events, event);
|
2020-08-06 23:31:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (old_event);
|
2020-06-08 22:07:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_push_history (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *history_event)
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool;
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTimeCoord hist;
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_assert (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY));
|
|
|
|
g_assert (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (history_event, GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY));
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (G_UNLIKELY (!self->history))
|
|
|
|
self->history = g_array_new (FALSE, TRUE, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (((GdkMotionEvent *)history_event)->history)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GArray *history = ((GdkMotionEvent *)history_event)->history;
|
|
|
|
g_array_append_vals (self->history, history->data, history->len);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tool = gdk_event_get_device_tool (history_event);
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
memset (&hist, 0, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord));
|
|
|
|
hist.time = gdk_event_get_time (history_event);
|
2022-04-05 21:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if (tool)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hist.flags = gdk_device_tool_get_axes (tool);
|
|
|
|
for (i = GDK_AXIS_X; i < GDK_AXIS_LAST; i++)
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_axis (history_event, i, &hist.axes[i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-04-05 21:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* GdkTimeCoord has no dedicated fields to record event position. For plain
|
|
|
|
* pointer events, and for tools which don't report GDK_AXIS_X/GDK_AXIS_Y
|
|
|
|
* on their own, we surface the position using the X and Y input axes.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (!(hist.flags & GDK_AXIS_FLAG_X) || !(hist.flags & GDK_AXIS_FLAG_Y))
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-04-05 21:56:33 +00:00
|
|
|
hist.flags |= GDK_AXIS_FLAG_X | GDK_AXIS_FLAG_Y;
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_position (history_event, &hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_X], &hist.axes[GDK_AXIS_Y]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_array_append_val (self->history, hist);
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
/* If the last N events in the event queue are motion notify
|
|
|
|
* events for the same surface, drop all but the last.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If a button is held down or the device has a tool, then
|
|
|
|
* we give the remaining events a history containing the N-1
|
|
|
|
* dropped events.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_handle_motion_compression (GdkDisplay *display)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GList *tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
GList *pending_motions = NULL;
|
2018-03-20 14:14:10 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkSurface *pending_motion_surface = NULL;
|
2013-02-14 19:51:33 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *pending_motion_device = NULL;
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *last_motion = NULL;
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
tmp_list = g_queue_peek_tail_link (&display->queued_events);
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (tmp_list)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-10-11 06:42:41 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = tmp_list->data;
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (event->flags & GDK_EVENT_PENDING)
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (event->event_type != GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY)
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-20 14:14:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (pending_motion_surface != NULL &&
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motion_surface != event->surface)
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2013-02-14 19:51:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if (pending_motion_device != NULL &&
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motion_device != event->device)
|
2013-02-14 19:51:33 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!last_motion)
|
|
|
|
last_motion = event;
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motion_surface = event->surface;
|
|
|
|
pending_motion_device = event->device;
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motions = tmp_list;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tmp_list = tmp_list->prev;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (pending_motions && pending_motions->next != NULL)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GList *next = pending_motions->next;
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (last_motion != NULL)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((gdk_event_get_modifier_state (last_motion) &
|
|
|
|
(GDK_BUTTON1_MASK | GDK_BUTTON2_MASK | GDK_BUTTON3_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_BUTTON4_MASK | GDK_BUTTON5_MASK)) ||
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_device_tool (last_motion) != NULL)
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_push_history (last_motion, pending_motions->data);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-31 11:37:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 20:07:24 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (pending_motions->data);
|
2019-02-05 15:05:06 +00:00
|
|
|
g_queue_delete_link (&display->queued_events, pending_motions);
|
2012-09-26 14:28:06 +00:00
|
|
|
pending_motions = next;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-11 23:04:34 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
_gdk_event_queue_flush (GdkDisplay *display)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-10-23 21:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
while (TRUE)
|
2013-11-11 23:04:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-10-23 21:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
event = (GdkEvent *)g_queue_pop_head (&display->queued_events);
|
|
|
|
if (!event)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
event->flags |= GDK_EVENT_FLUSHED;
|
2020-10-23 21:03:00 +00:00
|
|
|
_gdk_event_emit (event);
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (event);
|
2013-11-11 23:04:34 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_ref:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Increase the ref count of @event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer full): @event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-02-15 19:22:33 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_ref (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_ref_count_inc (&event->ref_count);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-15 20:40:03 +00:00
|
|
|
return event;
|
2020-02-15 19:22:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_unref:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (transfer full): a `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Decrease the ref count of @event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If the last reference is dropped, the structure is freed.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-02-15 19:22:33 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_unref (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_ref_count_dec (&event->ref_count))
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->finalize (event);
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-10 19:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_pointer_emulated:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns whether this event is an 'emulated' pointer event.
|
2016-05-10 19:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Emulated pointer events typically originate from a touch events.
|
2016-05-10 19:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if this event is emulated
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-12-28 00:37:01 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2016-05-10 19:16:45 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_pointer_emulated (GdkEvent *event)
|
2011-12-28 00:37:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
switch ((int) event->event_type)
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2011-02-28 19:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
case GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN:
|
|
|
|
case GDK_TOUCH_END:
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
case GDK_TOUCH_UPDATE:
|
2011-02-28 19:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
case GDK_TOUCH_CANCEL:
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *tevent = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
2011-01-31 05:43:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return tevent->pointer_emulated;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 21:46:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-10-02 21:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-09-10 10:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_axis:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* @axis_use: the axis use to look for
|
|
|
|
* @value: (out): location to store the value found
|
2013-09-10 10:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extract the axis value for a particular axis use from
|
|
|
|
* an event structure.
|
2013-09-10 10:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-12-15 22:29:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* To find out which axes are used, use [method@Gdk.DeviceTool.get_axes]
|
|
|
|
* on the device tool returned by [method@Gdk.Event.get_device_tool].
|
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the specified axis was found, otherwise %FALSE
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_axis (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
GdkAxisUse axis_use,
|
|
|
|
double *value)
|
2013-09-10 10:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
double *axes;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
guint n_axes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
2013-09-10 10:20:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (axis_use == GDK_AXIS_X || axis_use == GDK_AXIS_Y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
double x, y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!gdk_event_get_position (event, &x, &y))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (axis_use == GDK_AXIS_X && value != NULL)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*value = x;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (axis_use == GDK_AXIS_Y && value != NULL)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*value = y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!gdk_event_get_axes (event, &axes, &n_axes))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*value = axes[axis_use];
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up a
2000-12-16 Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com>
* gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.h, gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up
a gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h header over there.
* gtk/gtktreeview.c: s/SEPERATOR/SEPARATOR/g;
(gtk_tree_view_class_init): specify GTK_TYPE_ADJUSTMENT for signal
args
(gtk_tree_view_init): don't unset GTK_NO_WINDOW, it shouldn't be
set
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): don't gtk_widget_show() buttons
here, do it when we create the buttons later
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): add some g_return_if_fail
(gtk_tree_view_map): paranoia checks that column->button is shown
and unmapped
(gtk_tree_view_size_request): only request visible children.
Move header size calculation in here, for cleanliness, and
to maintain invariants for child widgets if we eventually
let users set different children inside the buttons
(gtk_tree_view_map_buttons): factor out code to map buttons,
since it was being called several times
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_buttons): move_resize the drag
windows instead of just moving them; their height may change
if we allow random widgets in there, or the theme changes.
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate): move button size allocation
above emitting the scroll signals, to ensure a sane state when we
hit user code
(gtk_tree_view_button_release): remove queue_resize after
tree_view_set_size(), set_size() will handle any resize queuing
that's needed
(gtk_tree_view_focus_in): just queue a draw, don't fool with
draw_focus goo
(gtk_tree_view_focus): use gtk_get_current_event() and
gdk_event_get_state()
(gtk_tree_view_deleted): don't queue_resize() after calling set_size()
(gtk_tree_view_build_tree): fix a "if (foo); {}" bug - i.e. remove
semicolon
(gtk_tree_view_create_button): show the button here
(gtk_tree_view_button_clicked): actually emit the clicked signal
on the column
(_gtk_tree_view_set_size): return right away if the size is
unchanged, as a cheesy optimization
(gtk_tree_view_setup_model): rename set_model_realized to
setup_model to match the flag that indicates whether we've
called it
(gtk_tree_view_get_hadjustment): create adjustment if it doesn't
exist, because set_scroll_adjustment does that and it shouldn't
matter what order you call these in
(gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): canonicalize the bool,
for paranoia
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): call
gtk_tree_view_map_buttons() instead of using cut-and-paste code
(gtk_tree_view_append_column): clarify whether the return value
is the count of columns before or after, and do the increment
separately from the return statement so you can tell from the code.
(gtk_tree_view_remove_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_insert_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_get_column): remove g_return_if_fail for columns
outside the existing range, the docs say that outside-range
columns are allowed, so we handle them as documented. (Presumably
this allows a nice loop with column != NULL as test.)
(gtk_tree_view_move_to): document what 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 alignments
mean (left/right/center etc.).
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_all): only queue a draw if we're mapped
(gtk_tree_view_expand_row): add docs
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_row): add docs
* gtk/gtktreeviewcolumn.c (gtk_tree_view_column_clicked): new
function to emit the clicked signal on a column
* gdk/gdkevents.c (gdk_event_get_state): new function, to get the
state of an event
(gdk_event_get_time): don't treat GDK_SCROLL
as a button event, remove default case from switch so gcc
will whine if we don't explicitly handle all event types
* gtk/gtktreeselection.h: added some FIXME
* gtk/gtktreeprivate.h (struct _GtkTreeViewPrivate): rename
"columns" to "n_columns" and "column" to "columns" for clarity
2000-12-17 23:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_event_triggers_context_menu:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`, currently only button events are meaningful values
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns whether a `GdkEvent` should trigger a context menu,
|
|
|
|
* according to platform conventions.
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* The right mouse button typically triggers context menus.
|
2024-07-29 18:07:13 +00:00
|
|
|
* On macOS, Control+left mouse button also triggers.
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* This function should always be used instead of simply checking for
|
2024-07-29 18:07:13 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* ```c
|
|
|
|
* event->button == GDK_BUTTON_SECONDARY
|
|
|
|
* ```
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the event should trigger a context menu.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up a
2000-12-16 Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com>
* gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.h, gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up
a gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h header over there.
* gtk/gtktreeview.c: s/SEPERATOR/SEPARATOR/g;
(gtk_tree_view_class_init): specify GTK_TYPE_ADJUSTMENT for signal
args
(gtk_tree_view_init): don't unset GTK_NO_WINDOW, it shouldn't be
set
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): don't gtk_widget_show() buttons
here, do it when we create the buttons later
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): add some g_return_if_fail
(gtk_tree_view_map): paranoia checks that column->button is shown
and unmapped
(gtk_tree_view_size_request): only request visible children.
Move header size calculation in here, for cleanliness, and
to maintain invariants for child widgets if we eventually
let users set different children inside the buttons
(gtk_tree_view_map_buttons): factor out code to map buttons,
since it was being called several times
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_buttons): move_resize the drag
windows instead of just moving them; their height may change
if we allow random widgets in there, or the theme changes.
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate): move button size allocation
above emitting the scroll signals, to ensure a sane state when we
hit user code
(gtk_tree_view_button_release): remove queue_resize after
tree_view_set_size(), set_size() will handle any resize queuing
that's needed
(gtk_tree_view_focus_in): just queue a draw, don't fool with
draw_focus goo
(gtk_tree_view_focus): use gtk_get_current_event() and
gdk_event_get_state()
(gtk_tree_view_deleted): don't queue_resize() after calling set_size()
(gtk_tree_view_build_tree): fix a "if (foo); {}" bug - i.e. remove
semicolon
(gtk_tree_view_create_button): show the button here
(gtk_tree_view_button_clicked): actually emit the clicked signal
on the column
(_gtk_tree_view_set_size): return right away if the size is
unchanged, as a cheesy optimization
(gtk_tree_view_setup_model): rename set_model_realized to
setup_model to match the flag that indicates whether we've
called it
(gtk_tree_view_get_hadjustment): create adjustment if it doesn't
exist, because set_scroll_adjustment does that and it shouldn't
matter what order you call these in
(gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): canonicalize the bool,
for paranoia
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): call
gtk_tree_view_map_buttons() instead of using cut-and-paste code
(gtk_tree_view_append_column): clarify whether the return value
is the count of columns before or after, and do the increment
separately from the return statement so you can tell from the code.
(gtk_tree_view_remove_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_insert_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_get_column): remove g_return_if_fail for columns
outside the existing range, the docs say that outside-range
columns are allowed, so we handle them as documented. (Presumably
this allows a nice loop with column != NULL as test.)
(gtk_tree_view_move_to): document what 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 alignments
mean (left/right/center etc.).
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_all): only queue a draw if we're mapped
(gtk_tree_view_expand_row): add docs
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_row): add docs
* gtk/gtktreeviewcolumn.c (gtk_tree_view_column_clicked): new
function to emit the clicked signal on a column
* gdk/gdkevents.c (gdk_event_get_state): new function, to get the
state of an event
(gdk_event_get_time): don't treat GDK_SCROLL
as a button event, remove default case from switch so gcc
will whine if we don't explicitly handle all event types
* gtk/gtktreeselection.h: added some FIXME
* gtk/gtktreeprivate.h (struct _GtkTreeViewPrivate): rename
"columns" to "n_columns" and "column" to "columns" for clarity
2000-12-17 23:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_triggers_context_menu (GdkEvent *event)
|
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up a
2000-12-16 Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com>
* gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.h, gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up
a gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h header over there.
* gtk/gtktreeview.c: s/SEPERATOR/SEPARATOR/g;
(gtk_tree_view_class_init): specify GTK_TYPE_ADJUSTMENT for signal
args
(gtk_tree_view_init): don't unset GTK_NO_WINDOW, it shouldn't be
set
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): don't gtk_widget_show() buttons
here, do it when we create the buttons later
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): add some g_return_if_fail
(gtk_tree_view_map): paranoia checks that column->button is shown
and unmapped
(gtk_tree_view_size_request): only request visible children.
Move header size calculation in here, for cleanliness, and
to maintain invariants for child widgets if we eventually
let users set different children inside the buttons
(gtk_tree_view_map_buttons): factor out code to map buttons,
since it was being called several times
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_buttons): move_resize the drag
windows instead of just moving them; their height may change
if we allow random widgets in there, or the theme changes.
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate): move button size allocation
above emitting the scroll signals, to ensure a sane state when we
hit user code
(gtk_tree_view_button_release): remove queue_resize after
tree_view_set_size(), set_size() will handle any resize queuing
that's needed
(gtk_tree_view_focus_in): just queue a draw, don't fool with
draw_focus goo
(gtk_tree_view_focus): use gtk_get_current_event() and
gdk_event_get_state()
(gtk_tree_view_deleted): don't queue_resize() after calling set_size()
(gtk_tree_view_build_tree): fix a "if (foo); {}" bug - i.e. remove
semicolon
(gtk_tree_view_create_button): show the button here
(gtk_tree_view_button_clicked): actually emit the clicked signal
on the column
(_gtk_tree_view_set_size): return right away if the size is
unchanged, as a cheesy optimization
(gtk_tree_view_setup_model): rename set_model_realized to
setup_model to match the flag that indicates whether we've
called it
(gtk_tree_view_get_hadjustment): create adjustment if it doesn't
exist, because set_scroll_adjustment does that and it shouldn't
matter what order you call these in
(gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): canonicalize the bool,
for paranoia
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): call
gtk_tree_view_map_buttons() instead of using cut-and-paste code
(gtk_tree_view_append_column): clarify whether the return value
is the count of columns before or after, and do the increment
separately from the return statement so you can tell from the code.
(gtk_tree_view_remove_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_insert_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_get_column): remove g_return_if_fail for columns
outside the existing range, the docs say that outside-range
columns are allowed, so we handle them as documented. (Presumably
this allows a nice loop with column != NULL as test.)
(gtk_tree_view_move_to): document what 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 alignments
mean (left/right/center etc.).
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_all): only queue a draw if we're mapped
(gtk_tree_view_expand_row): add docs
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_row): add docs
* gtk/gtktreeviewcolumn.c (gtk_tree_view_column_clicked): new
function to emit the clicked signal on a column
* gdk/gdkevents.c (gdk_event_get_state): new function, to get the
state of an event
(gdk_event_get_time): don't treat GDK_SCROLL
as a button event, remove default case from switch so gcc
will whine if we don't explicitly handle all event types
* gtk/gtktreeselection.h: added some FIXME
* gtk/gtktreeprivate.h (struct _GtkTreeViewPrivate): rename
"columns" to "n_columns" and "column" to "columns" for clarity
2000-12-17 23:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (event != NULL, FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (event->event_type == GDK_BUTTON_PRESS)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *bevent = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_SURFACE (event->surface), FALSE);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (bevent->button == GDK_BUTTON_SECONDARY &&
|
|
|
|
! (bevent->state & (GDK_BUTTON1_MASK | GDK_BUTTON2_MASK)))
|
2000-12-18 19:12:35 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2024-07-29 17:59:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __APPLE__
|
|
|
|
if (bevent->button == GDK_BUTTON_PRIMARY &&
|
|
|
|
(bevent->state & GDK_CONTROL_MASK) &&
|
|
|
|
! (bevent->state & (GDK_BUTTON1_MASK | GDK_BUTTON2_MASK)))
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up a
2000-12-16 Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com>
* gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.h, gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up
a gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h header over there.
* gtk/gtktreeview.c: s/SEPERATOR/SEPARATOR/g;
(gtk_tree_view_class_init): specify GTK_TYPE_ADJUSTMENT for signal
args
(gtk_tree_view_init): don't unset GTK_NO_WINDOW, it shouldn't be
set
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): don't gtk_widget_show() buttons
here, do it when we create the buttons later
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): add some g_return_if_fail
(gtk_tree_view_map): paranoia checks that column->button is shown
and unmapped
(gtk_tree_view_size_request): only request visible children.
Move header size calculation in here, for cleanliness, and
to maintain invariants for child widgets if we eventually
let users set different children inside the buttons
(gtk_tree_view_map_buttons): factor out code to map buttons,
since it was being called several times
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_buttons): move_resize the drag
windows instead of just moving them; their height may change
if we allow random widgets in there, or the theme changes.
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate): move button size allocation
above emitting the scroll signals, to ensure a sane state when we
hit user code
(gtk_tree_view_button_release): remove queue_resize after
tree_view_set_size(), set_size() will handle any resize queuing
that's needed
(gtk_tree_view_focus_in): just queue a draw, don't fool with
draw_focus goo
(gtk_tree_view_focus): use gtk_get_current_event() and
gdk_event_get_state()
(gtk_tree_view_deleted): don't queue_resize() after calling set_size()
(gtk_tree_view_build_tree): fix a "if (foo); {}" bug - i.e. remove
semicolon
(gtk_tree_view_create_button): show the button here
(gtk_tree_view_button_clicked): actually emit the clicked signal
on the column
(_gtk_tree_view_set_size): return right away if the size is
unchanged, as a cheesy optimization
(gtk_tree_view_setup_model): rename set_model_realized to
setup_model to match the flag that indicates whether we've
called it
(gtk_tree_view_get_hadjustment): create adjustment if it doesn't
exist, because set_scroll_adjustment does that and it shouldn't
matter what order you call these in
(gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): canonicalize the bool,
for paranoia
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): call
gtk_tree_view_map_buttons() instead of using cut-and-paste code
(gtk_tree_view_append_column): clarify whether the return value
is the count of columns before or after, and do the increment
separately from the return statement so you can tell from the code.
(gtk_tree_view_remove_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_insert_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_get_column): remove g_return_if_fail for columns
outside the existing range, the docs say that outside-range
columns are allowed, so we handle them as documented. (Presumably
this allows a nice loop with column != NULL as test.)
(gtk_tree_view_move_to): document what 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 alignments
mean (left/right/center etc.).
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_all): only queue a draw if we're mapped
(gtk_tree_view_expand_row): add docs
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_row): add docs
* gtk/gtktreeviewcolumn.c (gtk_tree_view_column_clicked): new
function to emit the clicked signal on a column
* gdk/gdkevents.c (gdk_event_get_state): new function, to get the
state of an event
(gdk_event_get_time): don't treat GDK_SCROLL
as a button event, remove default case from switch so gcc
will whine if we don't explicitly handle all event types
* gtk/gtktreeselection.h: added some FIXME
* gtk/gtktreeprivate.h (struct _GtkTreeViewPrivate): rename
"columns" to "n_columns" and "column" to "columns" for clarity
2000-12-17 23:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2000-12-18 19:12:35 +00:00
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up a
2000-12-16 Havoc Pennington <hp@pobox.com>
* gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.h, gtk/gdk-pixbuf-loader.c:
Port to GObject, can go back in gdk-pixbuf after setting up
a gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h header over there.
* gtk/gtktreeview.c: s/SEPERATOR/SEPARATOR/g;
(gtk_tree_view_class_init): specify GTK_TYPE_ADJUSTMENT for signal
args
(gtk_tree_view_init): don't unset GTK_NO_WINDOW, it shouldn't be
set
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): don't gtk_widget_show() buttons
here, do it when we create the buttons later
(gtk_tree_view_realize_buttons): add some g_return_if_fail
(gtk_tree_view_map): paranoia checks that column->button is shown
and unmapped
(gtk_tree_view_size_request): only request visible children.
Move header size calculation in here, for cleanliness, and
to maintain invariants for child widgets if we eventually
let users set different children inside the buttons
(gtk_tree_view_map_buttons): factor out code to map buttons,
since it was being called several times
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_buttons): move_resize the drag
windows instead of just moving them; their height may change
if we allow random widgets in there, or the theme changes.
(gtk_tree_view_size_allocate): move button size allocation
above emitting the scroll signals, to ensure a sane state when we
hit user code
(gtk_tree_view_button_release): remove queue_resize after
tree_view_set_size(), set_size() will handle any resize queuing
that's needed
(gtk_tree_view_focus_in): just queue a draw, don't fool with
draw_focus goo
(gtk_tree_view_focus): use gtk_get_current_event() and
gdk_event_get_state()
(gtk_tree_view_deleted): don't queue_resize() after calling set_size()
(gtk_tree_view_build_tree): fix a "if (foo); {}" bug - i.e. remove
semicolon
(gtk_tree_view_create_button): show the button here
(gtk_tree_view_button_clicked): actually emit the clicked signal
on the column
(_gtk_tree_view_set_size): return right away if the size is
unchanged, as a cheesy optimization
(gtk_tree_view_setup_model): rename set_model_realized to
setup_model to match the flag that indicates whether we've
called it
(gtk_tree_view_get_hadjustment): create adjustment if it doesn't
exist, because set_scroll_adjustment does that and it shouldn't
matter what order you call these in
(gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): canonicalize the bool,
for paranoia
(gtk_tree_view_set_headers_visible): call
gtk_tree_view_map_buttons() instead of using cut-and-paste code
(gtk_tree_view_append_column): clarify whether the return value
is the count of columns before or after, and do the increment
separately from the return statement so you can tell from the code.
(gtk_tree_view_remove_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_insert_column): ditto
(gtk_tree_view_get_column): remove g_return_if_fail for columns
outside the existing range, the docs say that outside-range
columns are allowed, so we handle them as documented. (Presumably
this allows a nice loop with column != NULL as test.)
(gtk_tree_view_move_to): document what 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 alignments
mean (left/right/center etc.).
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_all): only queue a draw if we're mapped
(gtk_tree_view_expand_row): add docs
(gtk_tree_view_collapse_row): add docs
* gtk/gtktreeviewcolumn.c (gtk_tree_view_column_clicked): new
function to emit the clicked signal on a column
* gdk/gdkevents.c (gdk_event_get_state): new function, to get the
state of an event
(gdk_event_get_time): don't treat GDK_SCROLL
as a button event, remove default case from switch so gcc
will whine if we don't explicitly handle all event types
* gtk/gtktreeselection.h: added some FIXME
* gtk/gtktreeprivate.h (struct _GtkTreeViewPrivate): rename
"columns" to "n_columns" and "column" to "columns" for clarity
2000-12-17 23:50:00 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_events_get_axis_distances (GdkEvent *event1,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event2,
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double *x_distance,
|
|
|
|
double *y_distance,
|
|
|
|
double *distance)
|
2001-06-28 22:49:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double x1, x2, y1, y2;
|
|
|
|
double xd, yd;
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!gdk_event_get_position (event1, &x1, &y1) ||
|
|
|
|
!gdk_event_get_position (event2, &x2, &y2))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
2001-06-28 22:49:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
xd = x2 - x1;
|
|
|
|
yd = y2 - y1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (x_distance)
|
|
|
|
*x_distance = xd;
|
2001-06-28 22:49:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (y_distance)
|
|
|
|
*y_distance = yd;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (distance)
|
|
|
|
*distance = sqrt ((xd * xd) + (yd * yd));
|
2001-06-28 22:49:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2001-06-28 22:49:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_events_get_distance:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event1: first `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
* @event2: second `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* @distance: (out): return location for the distance
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the distance between the event locations.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This assumes that both events have X/Y information.
|
|
|
|
* If not, this function returns %FALSE.
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the distance could be calculated.
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_events_get_distance (GdkEvent *event1,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event2,
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double *distance)
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return gdk_events_get_axis_distances (event1, event2,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
distance);
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_events_get_angle:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event1: first `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
* @event2: second `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* @angle: (out): return location for the relative angle between both events
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the relative angle from @event1 to @event2.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The relative angle is the angle between the X axis and the line
|
|
|
|
* through both events' positions. The rotation direction for positive
|
|
|
|
* angles is from the positive X axis towards the positive Y axis.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This assumes that both events have X/Y information.
|
|
|
|
* If not, this function returns %FALSE.
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the angle could be calculated.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_events_get_angle (GdkEvent *event1,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event2,
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double *angle)
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double x_distance, y_distance, distance;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!gdk_events_get_axis_distances (event1, event2,
|
|
|
|
&x_distance, &y_distance,
|
|
|
|
&distance))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (angle)
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*angle = atan2 (x_distance, y_distance);
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Invert angle */
|
|
|
|
*angle = (2 * G_PI) - *angle;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Shift it 90° */
|
|
|
|
*angle += G_PI / 2;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/* And constraint it to 0°-360° */
|
|
|
|
*angle = fmod (*angle, 2 * G_PI);
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-21 12:07:11 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_events_get_center:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event1: first `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
* @event2: second `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* @x: (out): return location for the X coordinate of the center
|
|
|
|
* @y: (out): return location for the Y coordinate of the center
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the point halfway between the events' positions.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This assumes that both events have X/Y information.
|
|
|
|
* If not, this function returns %FALSE.
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the center could be calculated.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_events_get_center (GdkEvent *event1,
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event2,
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-24 20:32:16 +00:00
|
|
|
double x1, x2, y1, y2;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!gdk_event_get_position (event1, &x1, &y1) ||
|
|
|
|
!gdk_event_get_position (event2, &x2, &y2))
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (x)
|
|
|
|
*x = (x2 + x1) / 2;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (y)
|
|
|
|
*y = (y2 + y1) / 2;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_sequence_copy (GdkEventSequence *sequence)
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
return sequence;
|
2011-08-28 19:26:47 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_sequence_free (GdkEventSequence *sequence)
|
2012-01-23 22:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Nothing to free here */
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-01-23 22:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_BOXED_TYPE (GdkEventSequence, gdk_event_sequence,
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_sequence_copy,
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_sequence_free)
|
2012-01-23 22:37:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-21 00:14:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_axes:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* @axes: (transfer none) (out) (array length=n_axes): the array of values for all axes
|
|
|
|
* @n_axes: (out): the length of array
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts all axis values from an event.
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-12-15 22:29:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* To find out which axes are used, use [method@Gdk.DeviceTool.get_axes]
|
|
|
|
* on the device tool returned by [method@Gdk.Event.get_device_tool].
|
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE on success, otherwise %FALSE
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_axes (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes)
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-05-08 13:53:41 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean ret;
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-08 13:53:41 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->get_axes (event, axes, n_axes);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (*axes == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-17 15:32:31 +00:00
|
|
|
double *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_dup_axes (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
double *axes;
|
|
|
|
guint n_axes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (gdk_event_get_axes (event, &axes, &n_axes))
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-02-04 19:16:02 +00:00
|
|
|
double *axes_copy = g_memdup2 (axes, n_axes * sizeof (double));
|
2020-12-17 15:32:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return axes_copy;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_event_type:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Retrieves the type of the event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: a `GdkEvent`Type
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkEventType
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_event_type (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return event->event_type;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_surface:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the surface associated with an event.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2022-01-01 16:03:10 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none) (nullable): The `GdkSurface` associated with the event
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_surface (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return event->surface;
|
2000-07-03 19:00:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-22 23:14:53 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_seat:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
2020-06-22 23:14:53 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns the seat that originated the event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (nullable) (transfer none): a `GdkSeat`.
|
2020-06-22 23:14:53 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkSeat *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_seat (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return event->device ? gdk_device_get_seat (event->device) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_device:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`.
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the device of an event.
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (nullable) (transfer none): a `GdkDevice`
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_device (GdkEvent *event)
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return event->device;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_device_tool:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns a `GdkDeviceTool` representing the tool that
|
|
|
|
* caused the event.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* If the was not generated by a device that supports
|
|
|
|
* different tools (such as a tablet), this function will
|
|
|
|
* return %NULL.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Note: the `GdkDeviceTool` will be constant during
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* the application lifetime, if settings must be stored
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* persistently across runs, see [method@Gdk.DeviceTool.get_serial].
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-21 00:45:06 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none) (nullable): The current device tool
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_device_tool (GdkEvent *event)
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->get_tool (event);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_time:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the timestamp of @event.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Not all events have timestamps. In that case, this function
|
|
|
|
* returns %GDK_CURRENT_TIME.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: timestamp field from @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
guint32
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_time (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), GDK_CURRENT_TIME);
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return event->time;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_display:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Retrieves the display associated to the @event.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-05-20 03:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none) (nullable): a `GdkDisplay`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkDisplay *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_display (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (event->surface)
|
|
|
|
return gdk_surface_get_display (event->surface);
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2011-09-27 13:37:28 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_event_sequence:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
|
|
|
*
|
2022-11-18 03:24:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns the event sequence to which the event belongs.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Related touch events are connected in a sequence. Other
|
|
|
|
* events typically don't have event sequence information.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none): the event sequence that the event belongs to
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_event_sequence (GdkEvent *event)
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->get_sequence (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_modifier_state:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns the modifier state field of an event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the modifier state of @event
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_modifier_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->get_state (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_position:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @x: (out): location to put event surface x coordinate
|
|
|
|
* @y: (out): location to put event surface y coordinate
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extract the event surface relative x/y coordinates from an event.
|
2023-03-25 19:06:19 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This position is in [surface coordinates](coordinates.html).
|
2024-05-25 17:21:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: whether the positions were set
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return GDK_EVENT_GET_CLASS (event)->get_position (event, x, y);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkButtonEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkButtonEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* An event related to a button on a pointer device.
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->tool);
|
|
|
|
g_clear_pointer (&self->axes, g_free);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_tool (GdkEvent *event)
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->tool;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_axes (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes)
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *source_device = gdk_event_get_device (event);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (source_device == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*axes = self->axes;
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*n_axes = GDK_AXIS_LAST;
|
2010-05-25 22:38:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2007-02-06 14:53:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_button_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkButtonEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_position,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_tool,
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_axes,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkButtonEvent, gdk_button_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_button_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_BUTTON_PRESS)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE))
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
guint button,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
double *axes)
|
2002-10-02 21:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_BUTTON_PRESS ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
2002-10-02 21:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->tool = tool != NULL ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->axes = axes;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->button = button;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
2002-10-02 21:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2002-10-02 21:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_button_event_get_button:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkButtonEvent): a button event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extract the button number from a button event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the button of @event
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_button_event_get_button (GdkEvent *event)
|
2011-03-01 07:36:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkButtonEvent *self = (GdkButtonEvent *) event;
|
2011-03-01 07:36:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_BUTTON_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE), 0);
|
2011-02-28 19:53:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->button;
|
2011-03-01 07:36:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
1998-12-15 13:54:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkKeyEvent */
|
2014-05-20 12:07:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkKeyEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a key-based device.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_free (self->compose_sequence);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
2013-08-13 23:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
2013-08-13 23:06:48 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-11-26 18:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_key_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkKeyEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_finalize,
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkKeyEvent, gdk_key_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_key_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_KEY_PRESS)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_KEY_RELEASE))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_new:
|
|
|
|
* @type: the event type, either %GDK_KEY_PRESS or %GDK_KEY_RELEASE
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @surface: the surface of the event
|
|
|
|
* @device: the device related to the event
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @time: the event's timestamp
|
|
|
|
* @keycode: the keycode of the event
|
|
|
|
* @state: the modifiers state
|
|
|
|
* @is_modifier: whether the event is a modifiers only event
|
|
|
|
* @translated: the translated key data for the given @state
|
|
|
|
* @no_lock: the translated key data without the given @state
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
* @compose_sequence: (transfer none) (nullable):
|
|
|
|
* The compose sequence string, either partial or only the
|
|
|
|
* final composed string, if that can be determined at event
|
|
|
|
* creation time. Used by selected IM modules.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Creates a new `GdkKeyEvent`.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer full) (type GdkKeyEvent): the newly created `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
guint keycode,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
gboolean is_modifier,
|
|
|
|
GdkTranslatedKey *translated,
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTranslatedKey *no_lock,
|
|
|
|
char *compose_sequence)
|
2015-11-26 18:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_KEY_PRESS ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_KEY_RELEASE, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *event = (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2015-11-26 18:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->keycode = keycode;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->key_is_modifier = is_modifier;
|
|
|
|
self->translated[0] = *translated;
|
|
|
|
self->translated[1] = *no_lock;
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
self->compose_sequence = g_strdup (compose_sequence);
|
2015-12-16 18:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return event;
|
2015-11-26 18:53:09 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-01-06 13:52:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-22 11:35:58 +00:00
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_translated_key:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
* @no_lock: whether the translated key should take the event
|
|
|
|
* state into account
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the translated key from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none): the translated key
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkTranslatedKey *
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_translated_key (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
gboolean no_lock)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (no_lock)
|
|
|
|
return &(self->translated[1]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return &(self->translated[0]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-24 11:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_compose_sequence:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the compose sequence string from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none): the compose sequence string
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
char *
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_compose_sequence (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->compose_sequence;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_keyval:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the keyval from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the keyval of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_keyval (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), 0);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->translated[0].keyval;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_keycode:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the keycode from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the keycode of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_keycode (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), 0);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->keycode;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_level:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the shift level from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the shift level of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_level (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->translated[0].level;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_layout:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the layout from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the layout of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_layout (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->translated[0].layout;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_consumed_modifiers:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the consumed modifiers from a key event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the consumed modifiers or @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_consumed_modifiers (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->translated[0].consumed;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_is_modifier:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts whether the key event is for a modifier key.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the @event is for a modifier key
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_is_modifier (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->key_is_modifier;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-15 19:23:00 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
keyval_in_group (GdkKeymap *keymap,
|
|
|
|
guint keyval,
|
|
|
|
int group)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeymapKey *keys;
|
|
|
|
guint n_keys;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gdk_keymap_get_cached_entries_for_keyval (keymap, keyval, &keys, &n_keys);
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < n_keys; i++)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (keys[i].group == group)
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_matches:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @keyval: the keyval to match
|
|
|
|
* @modifiers: the modifiers to match
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Matches a key event against a keyval and modifiers.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This is typically used to trigger keyboard shortcuts such as Ctrl-C.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Partial matches are possible where the combination matches
|
|
|
|
* if the currently active group is ignored.
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that we ignore Caps Lock for matching.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: a `GdkKeyMatch` value describing whether @event matches
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyMatch
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_matches (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
guint keyval,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType modifiers)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
2020-04-30 04:33:06 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkKeymap *keymap;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
guint keycode;
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state;
|
|
|
|
guint ev_keyval;
|
|
|
|
int layout;
|
|
|
|
int level;
|
gdkevents: Don't ignore modifiers that are not currently active
The X11 backend can mark modifiers like Shift as consumed even if they
aren't actually active, which seems to be something to do with making
shortcuts like `<Control><Shift>plus` and `<Control>plus` work as
intended regardless of whether the plus symbol is obtained by pressing
Shift and a key (like `+/=` on American, British or French keyboards)
or not (like `*/+` on German keyboards).
However, this can go badly wrong when the modifier is *not* pressed.
For example, terminals normally have separate bindings for `<Control>c`
(send SIGINT) and `<Control><Shift>c` (copy). If we disregard the
consumed modifiers completely, when the X11 backend marks Shift as
consumed, pressing Ctrl+c would send SIGINT *and* copy to the clipboard,
which is not what was intended.
By masking out the members of `consumed` that are not in `state`, we
get the same interpretation for X11 and Wayland, and ensure that
keyboard shortcuts that explicitly mention Shift can only be triggered
while holding Shift. It continues to be possible to trigger keyboard
shortcuts that do not explicitly mention Shift (such as `<Control>plus`)
while holding Shift, if the backend reports Shift as having been
consumed in order to generate the plus keysym.
Resolves: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5095
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1016927
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
2022-09-17 17:53:00 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkModifierType ignored_modifiers;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkModifierType shift_group_mask;
|
|
|
|
gboolean group_mod_is_accel_mod = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
const GdkModifierType mask = GDK_CONTROL_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_SHIFT_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_ALT_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_SUPER_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_HYPER_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_META_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), GDK_KEY_MATCH_NONE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), GDK_KEY_MATCH_NONE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keycode = self->keycode;
|
|
|
|
state = self->state & ~GDK_LOCK_MASK;
|
|
|
|
ev_keyval = self->translated[1].keyval;
|
|
|
|
layout = self->translated[1].layout;
|
|
|
|
level = self->translated[1].level;
|
gdkevents: Don't ignore modifiers that are not currently active
The X11 backend can mark modifiers like Shift as consumed even if they
aren't actually active, which seems to be something to do with making
shortcuts like `<Control><Shift>plus` and `<Control>plus` work as
intended regardless of whether the plus symbol is obtained by pressing
Shift and a key (like `+/=` on American, British or French keyboards)
or not (like `*/+` on German keyboards).
However, this can go badly wrong when the modifier is *not* pressed.
For example, terminals normally have separate bindings for `<Control>c`
(send SIGINT) and `<Control><Shift>c` (copy). If we disregard the
consumed modifiers completely, when the X11 backend marks Shift as
consumed, pressing Ctrl+c would send SIGINT *and* copy to the clipboard,
which is not what was intended.
By masking out the members of `consumed` that are not in `state`, we
get the same interpretation for X11 and Wayland, and ensure that
keyboard shortcuts that explicitly mention Shift can only be triggered
while holding Shift. It continues to be possible to trigger keyboard
shortcuts that do not explicitly mention Shift (such as `<Control>plus`)
while holding Shift, if the backend reports Shift as having been
consumed in order to generate the plus keysym.
Resolves: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5095
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1016927
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
2022-09-17 17:53:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If a modifier is currently active (e.g. Shift is pressed) and was marked
|
|
|
|
* as consumed, we ignore it for the purposes of matching shortcuts.
|
|
|
|
* For example, when Ctrl+Shift+[plus/equals key] is translated into
|
|
|
|
* Ctrl+plus on a keyboard where Shift+equals is the plus sign, we want
|
|
|
|
* shortcuts for either <Control><Shift>plus or <Control>plus to match.
|
|
|
|
* (See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100439)
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If a modifier is *not* currently active, the X11 backend can sometimes
|
|
|
|
* mark it as consumed where the Wayland and Windows backends do not.
|
|
|
|
* In this case, we still want to pay attention to its state.
|
|
|
|
* For example, when Ctrl+x is translated into Ctrl+x, we only want to
|
|
|
|
* trigger shortcuts for <Control>x, not for <Control><Shift>x.
|
|
|
|
* (See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5095)
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ignored_modifiers = (self->translated[1].consumed & state);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* if the group-toggling modifier is part of the default accel mod
|
|
|
|
* mask, and it is active, disable it for matching
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* FIXME: get shift group mask from backends
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
shift_group_mask = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mask & shift_group_mask)
|
|
|
|
group_mod_is_accel_mod = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
|
gdkevents: Don't ignore modifiers that are not currently active
The X11 backend can mark modifiers like Shift as consumed even if they
aren't actually active, which seems to be something to do with making
shortcuts like `<Control><Shift>plus` and `<Control>plus` work as
intended regardless of whether the plus symbol is obtained by pressing
Shift and a key (like `+/=` on American, British or French keyboards)
or not (like `*/+` on German keyboards).
However, this can go badly wrong when the modifier is *not* pressed.
For example, terminals normally have separate bindings for `<Control>c`
(send SIGINT) and `<Control><Shift>c` (copy). If we disregard the
consumed modifiers completely, when the X11 backend marks Shift as
consumed, pressing Ctrl+c would send SIGINT *and* copy to the clipboard,
which is not what was intended.
By masking out the members of `consumed` that are not in `state`, we
get the same interpretation for X11 and Wayland, and ensure that
keyboard shortcuts that explicitly mention Shift can only be triggered
while holding Shift. It continues to be possible to trigger keyboard
shortcuts that do not explicitly mention Shift (such as `<Control>plus`)
while holding Shift, if the backend reports Shift as having been
consumed in order to generate the plus keysym.
Resolves: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5095
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1016927
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
2022-09-17 17:53:00 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((modifiers & ~ignored_modifiers & mask) == (state & ~ignored_modifiers & mask))
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* modifier match */
|
|
|
|
GdkKeymapKey *keys;
|
2020-04-30 04:33:06 +00:00
|
|
|
guint n_keys;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
guint key;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Shift gets consumed and applied for the event,
|
|
|
|
* so apply it to our keyval to match
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
key = keyval;
|
|
|
|
if (modifiers & GDK_SHIFT_MASK)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (key == GDK_KEY_Tab)
|
|
|
|
key = GDK_KEY_ISO_Left_Tab;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
key = gdk_keyval_to_upper (key);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ev_keyval == key && /* exact match */
|
|
|
|
(!group_mod_is_accel_mod ||
|
|
|
|
(state & shift_group_mask) == (modifiers & shift_group_mask)))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return GDK_KEY_MATCH_EXACT;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 04:33:06 +00:00
|
|
|
keymap = gdk_display_get_keymap (gdk_event_get_display (event));
|
|
|
|
gdk_keymap_get_cached_entries_for_keyval (keymap, keyval, &keys, &n_keys);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n_keys; i++)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (keys[i].keycode == keycode &&
|
|
|
|
keys[i].level == level &&
|
|
|
|
/* Only match for group if it's an accel mod */
|
2021-03-15 19:23:00 +00:00
|
|
|
(keys[i].group == layout ||
|
|
|
|
(!group_mod_is_accel_mod && !keyval_in_group (keymap, keyval, layout))))
|
|
|
|
return GDK_KEY_MATCH_PARTIAL;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return GDK_KEY_MATCH_NONE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_key_event_get_match:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkKeyEvent): a key `GdkEvent`
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @keyval: (out): return location for a keyval
|
|
|
|
* @modifiers: (out): return location for modifiers
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Gets a keyval and modifier combination that will match
|
|
|
|
* the event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* See [method@Gdk.KeyEvent.matches].
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE on success
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_key_event_get_match (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
guint *keyval,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType *modifiers)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkKeyEvent *self = (GdkKeyEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
guint key;
|
|
|
|
guint accel_key;
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType accel_mods;
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType consumed_modifiers;
|
|
|
|
const GdkModifierType mask = GDK_CONTROL_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_SHIFT_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_ALT_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_SUPER_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_HYPER_MASK |
|
|
|
|
GDK_META_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_KEY_RELEASE), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accel_key = self->translated[1].keyval;
|
|
|
|
accel_mods = self->state;
|
|
|
|
consumed_modifiers = self->translated[1].consumed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (accel_key == GDK_KEY_Sys_Req &&
|
|
|
|
(accel_mods & GDK_ALT_MASK) != 0)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* HACK: we don't want to use SysRq as a keybinding (but we do
|
|
|
|
* want Alt+Print), so we avoid translation from Alt+Print to SysRq
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
*keyval = GDK_KEY_Print;
|
|
|
|
*modifiers = accel_mods & mask;
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
key = gdk_keyval_to_lower (accel_key);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (key == GDK_KEY_ISO_Left_Tab)
|
|
|
|
key = GDK_KEY_Tab;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accel_mods &= mask & ~consumed_modifiers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (accel_key != key)
|
|
|
|
accel_mods |= GDK_SHIFT_MASK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*keyval = key;
|
|
|
|
*modifiers = accel_mods;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkTouchEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkTouchEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a touch-based device.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_clear_pointer (&self->axes, g_free);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_sequence (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->sequence;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_axes (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *source_device = gdk_event_get_device (event);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (source_device == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*axes = self->axes;
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*n_axes = GDK_AXIS_LAST;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_touch_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkTouchEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_position,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_sequence,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_axes,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkTouchEvent, gdk_touch_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_touch_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCH_END)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCH_UPDATE)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCH_CANCEL))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *sequence,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
double *axes,
|
|
|
|
gboolean emulating)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_TOUCH_END ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_TOUCH_UPDATE ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_TOUCH_CANCEL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->sequence = sequence;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->axes = axes;
|
|
|
|
self->touch_emulating = emulating;
|
|
|
|
self->pointer_emulated = emulating;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_touch_event_get_emulating_pointer:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchEvent): a touch event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts whether a touch event is emulating a pointer event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if @event is emulating
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_touch_event_get_emulating_pointer (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchEvent *self = (GdkTouchEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCH_UPDATE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCH_END) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCH_CANCEL), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->touch_emulating;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkCrossingEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkCrossingEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event caused by a pointing device moving between surfaces.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->child_surface);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (self)->finalize (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_crossing_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkCrossingEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_position,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkCrossingEvent, gdk_crossing_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_crossing_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_ENTER_NOTIFY)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_LEAVE_NOTIFY))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingMode mode,
|
|
|
|
GdkNotifyType detail)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_ENTER_NOTIFY ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_LEAVE_NOTIFY, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
self->detail = detail;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_crossing_event_get_mode:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkCrossingEvent): a crossing event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the crossing mode from a crossing event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the mode of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingMode
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_mode (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_ENTER_NOTIFY) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_LEAVE_NOTIFY), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->mode;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_crossing_event_get_focus:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkCrossingEvent): a crossing event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Checks if the @event surface is the focus surface.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the surface is the focus surface
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_focus (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_ENTER_NOTIFY) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_LEAVE_NOTIFY), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->focus;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_crossing_event_get_detail:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkCrossingEvent): a crossing event
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the notify detail from a crossing event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the notify detail of @event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkNotifyType
|
|
|
|
gdk_crossing_event_get_detail (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkCrossingEvent *self = (GdkCrossingEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_ENTER_NOTIFY) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_LEAVE_NOTIFY), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->detail;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkDeleteEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkDeleteEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to closing a top-level surface.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_delete_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkDeleteEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkDeleteEvent, gdk_delete_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_delete_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_DELETE))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_delete_event_new (GdkSurface *surface)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
return gdk_event_alloc (GDK_DELETE, surface, NULL, GDK_CURRENT_TIME);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkFocusEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkFocusEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* An event related to a keyboard focus change.
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_focus_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkFocusEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkFocusEvent, gdk_focus_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_focus_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_FOCUS_CHANGE))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_focus_event_new (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
gboolean focus_in)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkFocusEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_FOCUS_CHANGE, surface, device, GDK_CURRENT_TIME);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->focus_in = focus_in;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_focus_event_get_in:
|
2020-06-01 09:49:33 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkFocusEvent): a focus change event
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts whether this event is about focus entering or
|
|
|
|
* leaving the surface.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE of the focus is entering
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_focus_event_get_in (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkFocusEvent *self = (GdkFocusEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_FOCUS_CHANGE), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->focus_in;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkScrollEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkScrollEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a scrolling motion.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->tool);
|
2020-06-09 00:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
if (self->history)
|
|
|
|
g_array_free (self->history, TRUE);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (self)->finalize (event);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_tool (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->tool;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_scroll_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkScrollEvent),
|
2020-06-01 09:49:33 +00:00
|
|
|
NULL,
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_state,
|
2020-06-01 09:49:33 +00:00
|
|
|
NULL,
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_tool,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkScrollEvent, gdk_scroll_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_scroll_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_SCROLL))
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_new (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
double delta_x,
|
|
|
|
double delta_y,
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
gboolean is_stop,
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollUnit unit)
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_SCROLL, surface, device, time);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->tool = tool != NULL ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->direction = GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH;
|
|
|
|
self->delta_x = delta_x;
|
|
|
|
self->delta_y = delta_y;
|
|
|
|
self->is_stop = is_stop;
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
self->unit = unit;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_new_discrete (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
2022-05-06 11:50:23 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollDirection direction)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_SCROLL, surface, device, time);
|
2021-09-20 17:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
double delta_x = 0, delta_y = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (direction)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case GDK_SCROLL_UP:
|
|
|
|
delta_y = -1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GDK_SCROLL_DOWN:
|
|
|
|
delta_y = 1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GDK_SCROLL_LEFT:
|
|
|
|
delta_x = -1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GDK_SCROLL_RIGHT:
|
|
|
|
delta_x = 1;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH:
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
g_assert_not_reached ();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->tool = tool != NULL ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->direction = direction;
|
2021-09-20 17:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
self->delta_x = delta_x;
|
|
|
|
self->delta_y = delta_y;
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
self->unit = GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2015-01-06 13:52:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-20 17:59:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/*< private >
|
|
|
|
* gtk_scroll_event_new_value120:
|
|
|
|
* @surface: the `GdkSurface` of the event
|
|
|
|
* @device: the `GdkDevice` of the event
|
|
|
|
* @tool: (nullable): the tool that generated to event
|
|
|
|
* @time: the event serial
|
|
|
|
* @state: Flags to indicate the state of modifier keys and mouse buttons
|
|
|
|
* in events.
|
|
|
|
* @direction: scroll direction.
|
|
|
|
* @delta_x: delta on the X axis in the 120.0 scale
|
|
|
|
* @delta_x: delta on the Y axis in the 120.0 scale
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Creates a new discrete GdkScrollEvent for high resolution mouse wheels.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Both axes send data in fractions of 120 where each multiple of 120
|
|
|
|
* amounts to one logical scroll event. Fractions of 120 indicate a wheel
|
|
|
|
* movement less than one detent.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the newly created scroll event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_new_value120 (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollDirection direction,
|
|
|
|
double delta_x,
|
|
|
|
double delta_y)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_SCROLL, surface, device, time);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->tool = tool != NULL ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->direction = direction;
|
|
|
|
self->delta_x = delta_x / 120.0;
|
|
|
|
self->delta_y = delta_y / 120.0;
|
|
|
|
self->unit = GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-21 13:30:58 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_scroll_event_get_direction:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkScrollEvent): a scroll event
|
2016-04-21 13:30:58 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the direction of a scroll event.
|
2016-04-21 13:30:58 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: the scroll direction of @event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollDirection
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_direction (GdkEvent *event)
|
2016-04-21 13:30:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_SCROLL), 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->direction;
|
2016-04-21 13:30:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-04 11:41:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-26 15:30:50 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_scroll_event_get_deltas:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkScrollEvent): a scroll event
|
|
|
|
* @delta_x: (out): return location for x scroll delta
|
|
|
|
* @delta_y: (out): return location for y scroll delta
|
2017-12-26 15:30:50 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the scroll deltas of a scroll event.
|
2017-12-26 15:30:50 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* The deltas will be zero unless the scroll direction
|
|
|
|
* is %GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH.
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* For the representation unit of these deltas, see
|
|
|
|
* [method@Gdk.ScrollEvent.get_unit].
|
2017-12-26 15:30:50 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_deltas (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *delta_x,
|
|
|
|
double *delta_y)
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event));
|
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_SCROLL));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*delta_x = self->delta_x;
|
|
|
|
*delta_y = self->delta_y;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-21 12:07:11 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_scroll_event_is_stop:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkScrollEvent): a scroll event
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Check whether a scroll event is a stop scroll event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Scroll sequences with smooth scroll information may provide
|
|
|
|
* a stop scroll event once the interaction with the device finishes,
|
|
|
|
* e.g. by lifting a finger. This stop scroll event is the signal
|
|
|
|
* that a widget may trigger kinetic scrolling based on the current
|
|
|
|
* velocity.
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Stop scroll events always have a delta of 0/0.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the event is a scroll stop event
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_is_stop (GdkEvent *event)
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_SCROLL), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->is_stop;
|
2017-08-26 02:50:52 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-21 15:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_scroll_event_get_unit:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkScrollEvent): a scroll event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the scroll delta unit of a scroll event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The unit will always be %GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL if the scroll direction is not
|
|
|
|
* %GDK_SCROLL_SMOOTH.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the scroll unit.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Since: 4.8
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollUnit
|
|
|
|
gdk_scroll_event_get_unit (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_SCROLL),
|
|
|
|
GDK_SCROLL_UNIT_WHEEL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->unit;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkTouchpadEvent */
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkTouchpadEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* An event related to a gesture on a touchpad device.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Unlike touchscreens, where the windowing system sends basic
|
|
|
|
* sequences of begin, update, end events, and leaves gesture
|
|
|
|
* recognition to the clients, touchpad gestures are typically
|
|
|
|
* processed by the system, resulting in these events.
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_sequence (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->sequence;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_touchpad_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkTouchpadEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_position,
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_sequence,
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkTouchpadEvent, gdk_touchpad_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_touchpad_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCHPAD_SWIPE)
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_TOUCHPAD_HOLD))
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_new_swipe (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *sequence,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadGesturePhase phase,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
int n_fingers,
|
|
|
|
double dx,
|
|
|
|
double dy)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_BEGIN ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_END ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_UPDATE ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_CANCEL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_TOUCHPAD_SWIPE, surface, device, time);
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
self->sequence = sequence;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->phase = phase;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->dx = dx;
|
|
|
|
self->dy = dy;
|
|
|
|
self->n_fingers = n_fingers;
|
2020-02-19 03:43:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_new_pinch (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *sequence,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadGesturePhase phase,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
int n_fingers,
|
|
|
|
double dx,
|
|
|
|
double dy,
|
|
|
|
double scale,
|
|
|
|
double angle_delta)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_BEGIN ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_END ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_UPDATE ||
|
|
|
|
phase == GDK_TOUCHPAD_GESTURE_PHASE_CANCEL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH, surface, device, time);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-12-16 01:11:51 +00:00
|
|
|
self->sequence = sequence;
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->phase = phase;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->dx = dx;
|
|
|
|
self->dy = dy;
|
|
|
|
self->n_fingers = n_fingers;
|
|
|
|
self->scale = scale;
|
|
|
|
self->angle_delta = angle_delta;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2017-08-26 14:50:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_new_hold (GdkSurface *surface,
|
2022-08-05 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEventSequence *sequence,
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadGesturePhase phase,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
int n_fingers)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_TOUCHPAD_HOLD, surface, device, time);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->phase = phase;
|
2022-08-05 09:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
self->sequence = sequence;
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->n_fingers = n_fingers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-21 12:07:11 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_touchpad_event_get_gesture_phase:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchpadEvent): a touchpad event
|
2017-12-26 15:59:38 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the touchpad gesture phase from a touchpad event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: the gesture phase of @event
|
2017-09-21 12:07:11 +00:00
|
|
|
**/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadGesturePhase
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_gesture_phase (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH) ||
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_SWIPE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_HOLD), 0);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->phase;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_touchpad_event_get_n_fingers:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchpadEvent): a touchpad event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the number of fingers from a touchpad event.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: the number of fingers for @event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
guint
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_n_fingers (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH) ||
|
2021-06-27 09:49:24 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_SWIPE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_HOLD), 0);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->n_fingers;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_touchpad_event_get_deltas:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchpadEvent): a touchpad event
|
|
|
|
* @dx: (out): return location for x
|
|
|
|
* @dy: (out): return location for y
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts delta information from a touchpad event.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_deltas (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *dx,
|
|
|
|
double *dy)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event));
|
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_SWIPE));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*dx = self->dx;
|
|
|
|
*dy = self->dy;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_touchpad_event_get_pinch_angle_delta:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchpadEvent): a touchpad pinch event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the angle delta from a touchpad pinch event.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: the angle delta of @event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
double
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_pinch_angle_delta (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0.0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH), 0.0);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->angle_delta;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_touchpad_event_get_pinch_scale:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkTouchpadEvent): a touchpad pinch event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the scale from a touchpad pinch event.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: the scale of @event
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
double
|
|
|
|
gdk_touchpad_event_get_pinch_scale (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTouchpadEvent *self = (GdkTouchpadEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0.0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_TOUCHPAD_PINCH), 0.0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->scale;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkPadEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkPadEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a pad-based device.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_pad_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkPadEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkPadEvent, gdk_pad_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_pad_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PAD_BUTTON_PRESS)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PAD_BUTTON_RELEASE)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PAD_RING)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PAD_STRIP)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PAD_GROUP_MODE))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_new_ring (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
guint group,
|
|
|
|
guint index,
|
|
|
|
guint mode,
|
|
|
|
double value)
|
2020-04-05 18:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_PAD_RING, surface, device, time);
|
2020-04-05 18:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
self->group = group;
|
|
|
|
self->index = index;
|
|
|
|
self->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
self->value = value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-04-05 18:40:55 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_new_strip (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
guint group,
|
|
|
|
guint index,
|
|
|
|
guint mode,
|
|
|
|
double value)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_PAD_STRIP, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->group = group;
|
|
|
|
self->index = index;
|
|
|
|
self->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
self->value = value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_new_button (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
guint group,
|
|
|
|
guint button,
|
|
|
|
guint mode)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_PAD_BUTTON_PRESS ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_PAD_BUTTON_RELEASE, NULL);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->group = group;
|
|
|
|
self->button = button;
|
|
|
|
self->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_new_group_mode (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
guint group,
|
|
|
|
guint mode)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_PAD_GROUP_MODE, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->group = group;
|
|
|
|
self->mode = mode;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_pad_event_get_button:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkPadEvent): a pad button event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts information about the pressed button from
|
|
|
|
* a pad event.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: the button of @event
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
guint
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_get_button (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = (GdkPadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), 0);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_BUTTON_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_BUTTON_RELEASE), 0);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->button;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_pad_event_get_axis_value:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkPadEvent): a pad strip or ring event
|
|
|
|
* @index: (out): Return location for the axis index
|
|
|
|
* @value: (out): Return location for the axis value
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts the information from a pad strip or ring event.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_get_axis_value (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
guint *index,
|
|
|
|
double *value)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = (GdkPadEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event));
|
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_RING) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_STRIP));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*index = self->index;
|
|
|
|
*value = self->value;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_pad_event_get_group_mode:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkPadEvent): a pad event
|
|
|
|
* @group: (out): return location for the group
|
|
|
|
* @mode: (out): return location for the mode
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Extracts group and mode information from a pad event.
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
gdk_pad_event_get_group_mode (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
guint *group,
|
|
|
|
guint *mode)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkPadEvent *self = (GdkPadEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event));
|
|
|
|
g_return_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_GROUP_MODE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_BUTTON_PRESS) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_BUTTON_RELEASE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_RING) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_PAD_STRIP));
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*group = self->group;
|
|
|
|
*mode = self->mode;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkMotionEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkMotionEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a pointer or touch device motion.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->tool);
|
|
|
|
g_clear_pointer (&self->axes, g_free);
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
if (self->history)
|
|
|
|
g_array_free (self->history, TRUE);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkModifierType
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_state (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->state;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_tool (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->tool;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_axes (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double **axes,
|
|
|
|
guint *n_axes)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDevice *source_device = gdk_event_get_device (event);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (source_device == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*axes = self->axes;
|
2020-07-28 17:38:24 +00:00
|
|
|
*n_axes = GDK_AXIS_LAST;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_motion_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkMotionEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_state,
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_position,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_tool,
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_get_axes,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkMotionEvent, gdk_motion_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_motion_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_motion_event_new (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
GdkModifierType state,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y,
|
|
|
|
double *axes)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->tool = tool ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
self->axes = axes;
|
|
|
|
self->state = state;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_event_get_history:
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: a motion or scroll event
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
* @out_n_coords: (out): Return location for the length of the returned array
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Retrieves the history of the device that @event is for, as a list of
|
|
|
|
* time and coordinates.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* The history includes positions that are not delivered as separate events
|
|
|
|
* to the application because they occurred in the same frame as @event.
|
2020-06-09 17:59:26 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that only motion and scroll events record history, and motion
|
2021-12-15 05:24:05 +00:00
|
|
|
* events do it only if one of the mouse buttons is down, or the device
|
|
|
|
* has a tool.
|
2020-06-09 17:59:26 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2020-05-06 18:28:33 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer container) (array length=out_n_coords) (nullable): an
|
|
|
|
* array of time and coordinates
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkTimeCoord *
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_event_get_history (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
guint *out_n_coords)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-06-09 18:13:22 +00:00
|
|
|
GArray *history;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
2020-06-09 17:40:26 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_SCROLL), NULL);
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (out_n_coords != NULL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 18:13:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_MOTION_NOTIFY))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkMotionEvent *self = (GdkMotionEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
history = self->history;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkScrollEvent *self = (GdkScrollEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
history = self->history;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (history && history->len > 0)
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkTimeCoord *result;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 18:13:22 +00:00
|
|
|
*out_n_coords = history->len;
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-09 18:13:22 +00:00
|
|
|
result = g_malloc (sizeof (GdkTimeCoord) * history->len);
|
|
|
|
memcpy (result, history->data, sizeof (GdkTimeCoord) * history->len);
|
2020-04-25 15:50:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*out_n_coords = 0;
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkProximityEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkProximityEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to the proximity of a tool to a device.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_proximity_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkProximityEvent *self = (GdkProximityEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->tool);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkDeviceTool *
|
|
|
|
gdk_proximity_event_get_tool (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkProximityEvent *self = (GdkProximityEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->tool;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_proximity_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkProximityEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_proximity_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_proximity_event_get_tool,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkProximityEvent, gdk_proximity_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_proximity_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PROXIMITY_IN)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_PROXIMITY_OUT))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_proximity_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDeviceTool *tool,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkProximityEvent *self;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_PROXIMITY_IN ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_PROXIMITY_OUT, NULL);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->tool = tool ? g_object_ref (tool) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkDNDEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkDNDEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to drag and drop operations.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_finalize (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDNDEvent *self = (GdkDNDEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_clear_object (&self->drop);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_SUPER (event)->finalize (event);
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_get_position (GdkEvent *event,
|
|
|
|
double *x,
|
|
|
|
double *y)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDNDEvent *self = (GdkDNDEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
*x = self->x;
|
|
|
|
*y = self->y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static GdkEventSequence *
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_get_sequence (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDNDEvent *self = (GdkDNDEvent *) event;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEventSequence *) self->drop;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_dnd_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkDNDEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_finalize,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_get_position,
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_get_sequence,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkDNDEvent, gdk_dnd_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_dnd_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_DRAG_ENTER)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_DRAG_MOTION)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_DRAG_LEAVE)
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_DROP_START))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_new (GdkEventType type,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkDrop *drop,
|
|
|
|
guint32 time,
|
|
|
|
double x,
|
|
|
|
double y)
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkDNDEvent *self;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (type == GDK_DRAG_ENTER ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_DRAG_MOTION ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_DRAG_LEAVE ||
|
|
|
|
type == GDK_DROP_START, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
self = gdk_event_alloc (type, surface, device, time);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->drop = drop != NULL ? g_object_ref (drop) : NULL;
|
|
|
|
self->x = x;
|
|
|
|
self->y = y;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_dnd_event_get_drop:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkDNDEvent): a DND event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-02-21 05:13:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Gets the `GdkDrop` object from a DND event.
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none) (nullable): the drop
|
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
GdkDrop *
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_dnd_event_get_drop (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
GdkDNDEvent *self = (GdkDNDEvent *) event;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_DRAG_ENTER) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_DRAG_MOTION) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_DRAG_LEAVE) ||
|
|
|
|
GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_DROP_START), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return self->drop;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
|
|
|
/* {{{ GdkGrabBrokenEvent */
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-16 14:40:12 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* GdkGrabBrokenEvent:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* An event related to a broken windowing system grab.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static const GdkEventTypeInfo gdk_grab_broken_event_info = {
|
|
|
|
sizeof (GdkGrabBrokenEvent),
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
NULL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GDK_DEFINE_EVENT_TYPE (GdkGrabBrokenEvent, gdk_grab_broken_event,
|
|
|
|
&gdk_grab_broken_event_info,
|
|
|
|
GDK_EVENT_TYPE_SLOT (GDK_GRAB_BROKEN))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GdkEvent *
|
|
|
|
gdk_grab_broken_event_new (GdkSurface *surface,
|
|
|
|
GdkDevice *device,
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *grab_surface,
|
|
|
|
gboolean implicit)
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-07-28 22:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkGrabBrokenEvent *self = gdk_event_alloc (GDK_GRAB_BROKEN, surface, device, GDK_CURRENT_TIME);
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self->grab_surface = grab_surface;
|
|
|
|
self->implicit = implicit;
|
|
|
|
self->keyboard = gdk_device_get_source (device) == GDK_SOURCE_KEYBOARD;
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (GdkEvent *) self;
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-14 13:09:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* gdk_grab_broken_event_get_grab_surface:
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkGrabBrokenEvent): a grab broken event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Extracts the grab surface from a grab broken event.
|
|
|
|
*
|
2020-02-26 10:23:01 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: (transfer none): the grab surface of @event
|
2020-02-18 03:11:56 +00:00
|
|
|
**/
|
|
|
|
GdkSurface *
|
|
|
|
gdk_grab_broken_event_get_grab_surface (GdkEvent *event)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkGrabBrokenEvent *self = (GdkGrabBrokenEvent *) event;
|
2020-04-04 21:51:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), NULL);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_GRAB_BROKEN), NULL);
|
2020-04-04 21:51:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->grab_surface;
|
2020-04-04 21:51:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* gdk_grab_broken_event_get_implicit:
|
|
|
|
* @event: (type GdkGrabBrokenEvent): a grab broken event
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Checks whether the grab broken event is for an implicit grab.
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
* Returns: %TRUE if the an implicit grab was broken
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
gdk_grab_broken_event_get_implicit (GdkEvent *event)
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
GdkGrabBrokenEvent *self = (GdkGrabBrokenEvent *) event;
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT (event), FALSE);
|
|
|
|
g_return_val_if_fail (GDK_IS_EVENT_TYPE (event, GDK_GRAB_BROKEN), FALSE);
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return self->implicit;
|
2020-04-05 00:02:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Restructure the GdkEvent type hierarchy
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
2020-04-16 16:23:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* }}} */
|
2023-02-08 03:31:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* vim:set foldmethod=marker expandtab: */
|