Move bdfcursor.c from libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.

2002-02-28  Tor Lillqvist  <tml@iki.fi>

	* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
	libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.

	* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
	bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
	X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
This commit is contained in:
Tor Lillqvist 2002-02-28 00:49:36 +00:00 committed by Tor Lillqvist
parent 7ea17ce7fd
commit 3244b86dd6
9 changed files with 65 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2002-02-28 Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
* gdk/win32/Makefile.am: Move bdfcursor.c from
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES to EXTRA_DIST.
* gdk/win32/gdkgc-win32.c (gdk_win32_colormap_color_pack): In the
bitmap case, use just the LSB of the pixel value. Does this match
X11 semantics? Or should it be pixel!=0?
Wed Feb 27 19:16:50 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* gdk/x11/gdkwindow-x11.c (gdk_window_new):

View File

@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libgdk-win32.la
SUBDIRS=rc
EXTRA_DIST = \
bdfcursor.c \
makefile.mingw \
makefile.msc \
libie55uuid.la \
libwntab32x.la
libgdk_win32_la_SOURCES = \
bdfcursor.c \
xcursors.h \
gdkcolor-win32.c \
gdkcursor-win32.c \

View File

@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ _gdk_win32_colormap_color (GdkColormap *colormap,
guchar r, g, b;
if (colormap == NULL)
return DIBINDEX (pixel);
return DIBINDEX (pixel & 1);
colormap_private = GDK_WIN32_COLORMAP_DATA (colormap);