==23282== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8,069 of 13,389
==23282== at 0x4A074CD: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==23282== by 0x39A1C3E2EA: cairo_region_create (cairo-region.c:196)
==23282== by 0x6D9AF3D: recompute_visible_regions_internal (gdkwindow.c:964)
==23282== by 0x6D9B4B8: recompute_visible_regions (gdkwindow.c:1126)
==23282== by 0x6DA3450: gdk_window_hide (gdkwindow.c:5689)
==23282== by 0x6D9CED9: _gdk_window_destroy_hierarchy (gdkwindow.c:2042)
==23282== by 0x6D9D040: gdk_window_destroy (gdkwindow.c:2109)
==23282== by 0x655B5E4: gtk_entry_unrealize (gtkentry.c:3012)
==23282== by 0x7068BF3: g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (gmarshal.c:85)
==23282== by 0x706710B: g_type_class_meta_marshal (gclosure.c:885)
==23282== by 0x7066DF9: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:774)
==23282== by 0x7080585: signal_emit_unlocked_R (gsignal.c:3340)
==23282== by 0x707F619: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:3033)
==23282== by 0x707FB71: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3090)
==23282== by 0x679E243: gtk_widget_unrealize (gtkwidget.c:4458)
==23282== by 0x64E83C7: gtk_bin_forall (gtkbin.c:172)
==23282== by 0x6548BBD: gtk_container_forall (gtkcontainer.c:2014)
==23282== by 0x67A966D: gtk_widget_real_unrealize (gtkwidget.c:10253)
==23282== by 0x672D002: gtk_tool_item_unrealize (gtktoolitem.c:474)
==23282== by 0x7068BF3: g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (gmarshal.c:85)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666552
When an implicit paint is flushed during expose, e.g. because a
non-double buffered widget is painting, make sure to copy the existing
data from the window surface we rendered before flushing back to the
paint surface, instead of using an empty base.
Code was already handling that (and said so in the comment), but only
when no implicit paint was used at all, and not in the case when it's
flushed mid-expose.
gdk_window_get_update_area is supposed to get the area where things
need painting, and remove them from the update areas. However, if
some area is covered by other windows with an alpha background we
can't just expect whatever the app choses to render in the update
area as correct, so we don't actually remove these areas, meaning
they will get correctly rendered when we get to the expose handlers.
gdk_window_move_region doesn't move children, so we can't copy
transparent child window regions with copyarea, so we remove these
from the copy region.
We track the areas that have alpha coverage so that we can
avoid using these as sources when copying window contents.
We also don't remove such areas from the clipping regions so
that they are painted both by parent and child.
This cleans up the expose handling a bit by using the existing
clip regions, and it allows us later to use painters algorithm
to do transparent windows.
This state means that the toplevel window is presented as focused to the user,
i.e with active decorations under an X11 window manager.
If the GDK backend doesn't implement this flag, it will just remain set after
mapping the window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661428
The new file defines GDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS so it can happily
use deprecated APIs.
This commit moves those functions there that use deprecated functions
and currently cause warnings.
With this commit, GDK compiles without deprecation warnings.
Those if() blocks don't have any reason being there, as x and y are not
pointers. If the window is destroyed, just set the out values to zero
and return.
As seen in valgrind:
==3306== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==3306== at 0x624C74F: gdk_window_get_root_coords (gdkwindow.c:6933)
==3306== by 0x5E193C3: gtk_tooltip_show_tooltip (gtktooltip.c:1160)
==3306== by 0x5E19C05: tooltip_popup_timeout (gtktooltip.c:1282)
==3306== by 0x623B102: gdk_threads_dispatch (gdk.c:754)
==3306== by 0x8592F3A: g_timeout_dispatch (gmain.c:3907)
==3306== by 0x859174C: g_main_context_dispatch (gmain.c:2441)
==3306== by 0x8591F47: g_main_context_iterate (gmain.c:3089)
==3306== by 0x8592494: g_main_loop_run (gmain.c:3297)
==3306== by 0x5D2E501: gtk_main (gtkmain.c:1362)
==3306== by 0x5C5652F: gtk_application_run_mainloop
(gtkapplication.c:115)
==3306== by 0x7C47C9D: g_application_run (gapplication.c:1323)
==3306== by 0x447B5F: main (nautilus-main.c:102)
==3306== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==3306== at 0x624D48A: gdk_window_get_device_position
(gdkwindow.c:4952)
For client-side windows, we need to queue a repaint when the background
changes. For native windows, the windowing system does take care of it,
but client-side windows are our own, so we gotta do it manually.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652102
It could be the case that gdk_window_set_cursor() is called on
pointers not yet known to the device tracking code in GdkDisplay,
so update the cursor on all master pointers.
The code actually updating the cursor for the given window has
been refactored out to gdk_window_set_cursor_internal(), used
in gdk_window_set_device_cursor() as well, which makes it handle
root/foreign windows too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649313
This incorrect assignment would cause asynchronous aborts from the X server
(they would occur if for instance, an offscreen GtkTreeView calls
gtk_widget_error_bell()).
GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS was a way to keep some old apps running that did weird
things in gtk2. We should not have to carry this forwards in gtk 3.x.
We do however keep a g_warning() call reminding people of this fact to
ease debugging when they try to port their applications.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644119
constructors which take an object of the same class as its first argument are
mis-detected as method call with "self" argument by the GIR scanner. Using the
new (constructor) annotation from bug 561264, mark some of them as proper
constuctors, so that you can call them with NULL as first argument from
bindings; in particular, this fixes gdk_window_new() and the
gtk_radio_button_new_with*() constructors.
The previous function gdk_drag_get_protocol_for_display() took native
window handles, so it had to be changed. Because it didn't do what it
was named to do (it didn't return a protocol even though it was named
get_protocol) and because it doesn't operate on the display anymore but
on the actual window, it's now called gdk_window_get_drag_protocol().
