This one exhaustively tests reusing the same model as a child model for
many nodes.
This tracks that multiple items-changed signals emitted at the same time
(or multiple handlers for one such signal) doesn't put the treelistmodel
in an inconsistent state while it is handling all of them.
I'm not sure this (ab)use of treelistmodel should be officially
supported, but it works today, so let's test it to see if we can keep it
working.
In constrast to our other tests, these use
textures that are big enough to force slicing
with setting GSK_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE, which we
will use in the following commits to improve
test coverage.
That way, we can return the item even after the row is removed. This is
particularly relevant in ListItemFactory::unbind callbacks because they
often use gtk_tree_list_row_get_item() and user code never tracks
changes to this property.
A side effect of this is that the item will survive until the row gets
destroyed, but that's what users expect anyway, so we can live with it.
Related: #5646
In certain scenarios, address the issue where gnome.compile_resources
fails to transmit the present source directory. This is most notably
visible with MSBuild.
The GL renderer was creating sripes for nodes that were scaled in
particular ways, probably due to rounding errors.
This testsuite focuses on one of those stripes to make sure they are
gone.
This test fails if we naively create fullscale
intermediate offscreens. This was fixed in the
previous commits.
This tests the fixes in 22ba6b1f33 (for
cairo) and 3a0152b65f (for GL).
The previous code would include CSS padding/margin/border in the
measurement and that is wrong.
Until commit a96c75ff02 this was not actually visible, but afterwards
listitems were allocated 16px too wide.
Test included
The design patterns using statusbar are no longer popular,
and it is pretty easy to make a statusbar yourself with boxes
and labels, if you need one. The only thing special about
GtkStatusbar was its window resize handle, but that has
been gone for a long time.
The unaligned-offscreen and upside-down-label-3d tests are failing after
upgrading our CI images, seemingly because of some font rendering issue
that is hard to track. Let's use the "failing" testsuite mechanism that
we also use for the reftests.
These tests can be run manually, but are not suitable for use as an
acceptance test, so let's not make frameworks like Debian's autopkgtest
run these when they run ginsttest-runner in the most obvious way.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
There are two possible interpretations of "expected failure": either
the test *must* fail (exactly the inverse of an ordinary test, with
success becoming failure and failure becoming success), or the test
*may* fail (with success intended, but failure possible in some
environments). Autotools had the second interpretation, which seems
more useful in practice, but Meson has the first.
Instead of using should_fail, we can put the tests in one of two new
suites: "flaky" is intended for tests that succeed or fail unpredictably
according to the test environment or chance, while "failing" is for
tests that ought to succeed but currently never do as a result of a
bug or missing functionality. With a sufficiently new version of Meson,
the flaky and failing tests are not run by default, but can be requested
by running a setup that does not exclude them, with a command like:
meson test --setup=x11_unstable --suite=flaky --suite=failing
As a bonus, now that we're setting up setups and their excluded suites
programmatically, the gsk-compare-broadway tests are also excluded by
default when running the test setup for a non-broadway backend.
When running the tests in CI, --suite=gtk overrides the default
exclude_suites, so we have to specify --no-suite=flaky and
--no-suite=failing explicitly.
This arrangement is inspired by GNOME/glib!2987, which was contributed
by Marco Trevisan.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
