Those won't have ABS_MT_* axes, so won't be reported has having
XITouchClassInfo. Fallback on these to checking whether abs x/y axes are
available. After the Wacom checks, any remaining device with absolute axes
should be touchscreens, and GDK_SOURCE_MOUSE does indeed just make sense on
devices with relative axes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
Otherwise the outer loop control variable is messed up, and we end
up with uninitialized axes if there were any more valuators after
the XIKeyClass one.
This bug was sneakily introduced by fdb9a8e14, many thanks to
Carlos Soriano for helping spot the source of this bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753431
We used to "invalidate" scroll valuators, so the next scroll event could
be used as the base for the next scroll deltas. This has the inconvenience
that it invariably consumes the first event received after enter and,
due to interactions with WM overeager passive button grabs, there's a
possibility we don't scroll at all if we receive interleaved "smooth
scroll" XI_Motion events and XI_Enter events (Normally triggered by regular
scroll wheels in mice).
In order to fix this, and at the expense of some sync-call overhead on
XI_Enter events (one XIQueryDevice call per slave device), query the
current scroll valuator state for all the slaves of the entered pointer,
so we do know beforehand the right base values. If new devices are plugged
while the pointer is on top of the client, the initialized scroll values
will match the valuators'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750994https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750870
And use these for the missing axes if the valuator mask is incomplete.
This used to work fine on tablets because the Wacom driver ensures all
valuators are sent, which is not true if using the evdev driver.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703610
This fixes potential assertions if a GTK+ app gets to receive
a XINotifyPassiveGrab/Ungrab pointer crossing event, currently
triggerable by XIGrabEnter passive grabs.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
Scroll valuators were being just appended again and again, leading
to 1) a growing memory issue anytime a device changed 2) the first
scroll valuators to stay permanent on the application lifetime, as
the first stored valuators would always match.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705203
Passive grabs may take pointer focus out of the application, even though
the pointer didn't leave the window, but those events still trigger resetting
of the scroll axes. This is most visible with compiz, and possibly other
reparenting WMs, where passive grabs happen on the WM-managed window that
is a parent of the application toplevel.
As it is not possible to have scrolling happening on the timespan a passive
grab takes action, it is entirely safe for GTK+ to assume none happened if
it gets a crossing event of that nature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574#c33
This information will be useful in case someone stumbles on a situation
similar to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574, so we can
figure out where do the crossing events come from or go to easily.
It's been reported in several applications that scrolling feels jerky
since commit cc7b3985b3.
Investigation reported that the combination of passive 4-7 button grabs
on the toplevel and the presence of native subwindows might trigger
too often crossing events from the child window to the toplevel and
back as scroll "buttons" trigger the passive grab. Those crossing events
would reset the scroll valuators rendering scrolling from jerky on
touchpads (where there's intermediate smooth events between the emulated
button ones) to ineffective on regular mouse wheels (where the crossing
event would reset the valuators right before the single smooth scroll
event we get is delivered)
So, only reset scroll valuators when the pointer enters the toplevel
(we only care about this when the pointer is on the window after it's
been possibly scrolling somewhere else), and it doesn't come from an
inferior.
The situations where this happened varied though, the native subwindow
could be one created explicitly by the application, or created indirectly
through gdk_window_ensure_native(). The latter was mainly the case for
evolution (through gtk_selection_set_owner()) and any GtkScrolledWindow
under the oxygen-gtk3 theme (through gdk_window_set_composited())
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574
If you set GDK_SCALE=2 in the environment then all windows will be
scaled by 2. Its not an ideal solution as it doesn't handle
multi-monitors at different scales, and only affects gtk apps.
But it is a good starting points and will help a lot on HiDPI
laptops.
Add missing check in gdk_x11_device_manager_xi2_get_window(), returning
NULL if no valid XI2Event* has been found. Calling code seems to be
prepared to handle NULLs coming from this function, so it should be
safe enough (e.g. check gdk_event_source_get_filter_window()).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700465
On crossing events resulting from moving windows (eg. workspace switch),
deviceid equals sourceid, so make those reset scroll valuators on all
slave devices to avoid misleading jumps in scroll events
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690275
If we get a focus event for a X window we don't recognize, just
ignore it and avoid a g-critical when
_gdk_device_manager_core_handle_focus() is called with a NULL window.
GtkPlug directly handles X KeyPress/Release events, instead of using
translation in GDK (which expects XI2 events for XI2). When this
was done, the handling of the group was stubbed out and never replaced.
Export gdk_keymap_x11_group_for_state() and gdk_keymap_x11_is_modifier()
so we can fill out the fields correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675167
Since the event will be ignored anyway after it's translated (slave
devices are disabled), don't let it run in the smooth scroll code path,
as it will burn our caches for the actual event we're interested in.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673644
We want to avoid handling focus events for the private focus window,
otherwise the keyboard grab taken by for example buttons will cause a
spurious FOCUS_OUT/FOCUS_IN on the toplevel.
The code that did this seems to have been lost in the XI2 transition for
GTK3.
This patch reapplies db4a6040af which was
backed out in 18406b7b04 to give
developers a chance to get their X servers fixed. As we want to get this
bugfix in for 3.4, we need to commit it now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657578
XI2 provides us with an increment for each scroll valuator,
and by dividing the delta by the increment, we obtain normalized
values in some abstract 'scroll unit'.
For mouse wheels, the evdev driver reports an increment of -1,
so doing this division fixes the inverted scrolling with wheels
that we've seen recently.
XInput >= 2.1 allows for implementing smooth scrolling,
reporting the different scrolling axes as valuators.
Any change in those will be reported as GdkEventScroll
events with delta_x/y information.
the older kind of scroll events is still handled, and
emulated in devices able to provide smooth scrolling,
setting _gdk_event_set_pointer_emulated() in that case.
Translate XI_TouchBegin/Update/End to GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN/UPDATE/END
events.
At the same time,
set pointer-emulated flags on button events with XIPointerEmulated
and on touch events emulating the pointer.
We want to avoid handling focus events for the private focus window,
otherwise the keyboard grab taken by for example buttons will cause a
spurious FOCUS_OUT/FOCUS_IN on the toplevel.
The code that did this seems to have been lost in the XI2 transition for
GTK3.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657578
Dealing with disabled devices may turn into hierarchy/device
changed events on device IDs with no backing GdkDevice yet,
so protect against that. The device attachment will be handled
correctly when the device is enabled later.
Fixes bug #658379 - Disabled devices still added to list on startup,
spotted by Bastien Nocera. Do not create GdkDevices for disabled
devices on device manager construction, leading to a confusing initial
state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653947
It could happen that a cookie event has been already allocated/freed
in an event filter, as it can't be allocated a second time, all GDK
can do is skipping the event. Spotted by Guillaume Desmottes.
