This is already done in gdk_event_source_get_filter_window(), and
could lead to wrong event assignment if an event translator happens
to return a window for an event it doesn't handle.
This method can be implemented by event translators so they
return the right window from XGenericEventCookie events, as
ev->xany.window isn't meaningful for these.
GdkEventSource now also uses this to find out the right window
filters to apply.
The XI2 device manager was mistakenly setting the window user_time on
both ButtonPress and ButtonRelease, which meant that processes that
tried to launch another process based on the time of a ButtonPress
event would end up always focus-stealing-preventing the new app.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647275
_gdk_device_get_axis_use() dates back to pre-sealing, when the
xi2 work began, this remaining can be gone with a public
gdk_device_get_axis_use() function already in place.
The metacity theme format allows to use colors from the current
GTK+ theme in window decorations. Since GTK+ now gained support
for dark theme variants, window managers using that theme format
(metacity, mutter, compiz via gtk-window-decorator) should be able
to use colors from the correct variant; so in case a variant is
requested, export it in the _GTK_THEME_VARIANT property on
toplevel windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645354
XSendEvent doesn't currently work with XI2 events, so add code to
translate core events when they have the send_event flag.
(We still don't actually select for core pointer/keyboard events, so
we will only receive send_event events that are sent with a 0
event_mask.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644847
This code is a relic from GTK2 days and should not be necessary anymore,
as code now makes sure to only copy those parts of the window that are
not overlapped by parent windows.
By deleting it we fix potential issues with composited and translucent
windows copying the wrong data.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643416
The monitor change detection code in _gdk_x11_screen_size_changed() and
process_monitors_change() goes to some length to make sure its only emitted
when there is an actual change to the data visible via the GdkScreen monitors
api.
However, commit 662e69ad added some code that always emits "monitors-changed"
in _gdk_x11_screen_size_changed when we have randr13 and get a ConfigureNotify
on the root window (even though we may already have emitted it in the
RRScreenChangesNotify event!).
As far as I can tell this is due to a comment in the bug referenced by the
commit (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601712#c4) where it says:
This version of the patch changes GdkDisplay to emit "monitors-changed" when
the primary monitor changes (see the change in _gdk_x11_screen_size_changed).
And, if you remove this part of the change the signal is not emitted when just
the primary is changed. However, this is not really the right approach. We
should just also check for if the primary changes in process_monitors_change()
to avoid spurious signal emissions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643216
If a level 1 key maps to a key value passed to
gdk_test_simulate_key(), raise the GDK_SHIFT_MASK flag so the reqested
key value is generated. Also add a regression test for this fix.
Previously we weren't installing the device headers when compiling
without XINPUT support. But we would include them from gdkx.h, so
essentially the build was broken.
With this patch the types will exist but not do anything.
The previous function gdk_drag_get_protocol_for_display() took native
window handles, so it had to be changed. Because it didn't do what it
was named to do (it didn't return a protocol even though it was named
get_protocol) and because it doesn't operate on the display anymore but
on the actual window, it's now called gdk_window_get_drag_protocol().
... and all APIs making use of it.
That code like it hasn't been touched in years, Google codesearch
didn't find any users and most importantly it's a horrendous API, so
let's just make it die instead of having to port it over to
non-GdkNativeWindow usage, which would be required for multi-backend
GDK.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2011-January/msg00049.html
