This test check that resizing the window when expanding
the expander yields the same end result as having the
expander expanded to begin with. The test uses the inhibit
mechanism introduced in the previous commit.
This adds an inhibit api that code from the reftest module
can use to delay the taking of the snapshot. Also refactor
the code in gtk-reftest to use the inhibit mechanism for
its own delaying of the snapshot until after the first
expose.
This reftest makes use of the new feature to add signal handlers.
It adds a libreftest.so module containing all the code for the reftests.
When adding a test named reftest.ui, please keep code contained in a
source file names reftest.c and add that file to Makefile.am.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730833
When connecting signal names, gtk-reftest now allows you to use a colon
in the signal handler name like so:
module:function_name
where module is a module loaded from the same directory (or the .libs
subdirectory for compatibility with uninstalled libtool) as the running
test and the function is resolved in that module. Of course, normal
function names work as before.
This test just checks that all the icon names that GTK uses are present
in the default icon theme.
As icon names are not checked programmatically and we do not want to run
into missing-icon icons in the code, this test seems necessary.
For now, it's just a stub that tests stock icons.
To make the icontheme test run successfully when installed,
we need to use the correct test-framework-provided location,
and we need to install the test theme without stripping its
subdirectory structure.
This test is a bit brittle because it doesn't properly rely on CSS
properties but needs to use widget style properties to turn of extra
sizing from widgets.
It might break in the future when porting widgets to draw properly.
Quoting the spec:
If the cascaded value of a property is the unset keyword,
then if it is an inherited property, this is treated as
inherit, and if it is not, this is treated as initial.
Spec in question:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-cascade/
Also use unset in the reset-to-defaults.css we use to reset css in
reftests.
Added GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_PROPERTY and GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_SIGNAL
error codes
ObjectInfo: Use a GType instead of a char * for the class name.
PropertyInfo: Use a GParamSpec instead of a char * for the property name.
SignalInfo: Use signal id and detail quark instead of a detailed signal name string.
This not only save us a few malloc in each case but lets us simplify the code
and report unknown properties and signals as a parsing error instead of just
printing a warning.
Binding an object sensitive property with a check button active property will look like this:
<object class="GtkButton" id="button">
<property name="sensitive" bind-source="checkbutton" bind-property="active"/>
</object>
This is based on the original work done by Denis Washington for his GSoC project
This closes Bug 654417 "[GSoC] Add <binding> element to GtkBuilder syntax"
- As the tests show, some of the functions have a strange and
inconsistent behavior for corner cases.
- Rename test_full_buffer() -> test_search_full_buffer() because
textiter.c is used for other GtkTextIter unit tests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727908
In the unlikely case that there is another GPL released in the future
it would be best if we link directly to the 3.0 version of the
license description instead of the alias to the latest
version.
It seems that alternate implementations of GtkFileChooserWidget
never materialized. The split between GtkFileChooserWidget and
GtkFileChooserDefault is awkward. The immediate problem is that
it makes it difficult to document the keybinding signals. So it
makes sense to drop the abstraction and just have one thing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723157
The color chooser test is constantly running into the
problem that the custom color setting is not empty.
Avoid that by using the memory settings backend.
It would be nicer if we could have the tests specify what environment
their expected output was created in, then we could test multiple
scenarios. For now, just fix the setting to avoid test failures.
Stop trying to deal with "theoretical possibilities".
We can't possibly continue to be a faithful GActionGroup implementation
across dispose because dispose has a side effect of removing everyone's
signal handlers.
The code that we ran after the dispose chainup to do all of the fancy
signal emulation was therefore dead. The test that aimed to verify this
was buggy itself due to an uninitialised variable, so really, it never
worked at all.
We keep the re-ordering of the chainup from the original commit to avoid having
trouble with GtkActionMuxer and keep the checks in place that will prevent an
outright segfault in the case that someone else tries to use the interface
post-dispose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722189
