We move our menus.ui file into Gtk's namespace so that it will get
picked up. Accordingly, we no longer have to do any of the work for
ourselves...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
Move bloatpad to ./examples/bp/ so that we can start treating it as more of a
"normal" app instead of just jamming everything into a single .c file.
We don't use the name "bloatpad" for the directory in order not to
create 'git pull' pain with the probably-already-existing executable of
the same name.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
Cook up some silly cases to test out the hidden-when='' attribute.
- make sure hidden-when='action-missing' shows/hides items based on
actions being created and destroyed
- make sure hidden-when='action-disabled' shows/hides items based on
actions being enabled and disabled
- make sure hidden-when='action-missing' doesn't hide items when the
action is merely disabled
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688421
Notifications can only be associated with application actions,
but clear is a window action. Introduce a "clear-all" action
that forwards to clear on all windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721633
Make the sunny example useful by giving it a header bar
with app menu fallback. To test this under gnome-shell,
set APP_MENU_FALLBACK=1 in the environment.
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
Using an offset from the struct means you can have children in
both the public and private (via G_PRIVATE_OFFSET) parts of the
instance. It also matches the new private macros nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702563
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
Setting up the icon and desktop file is a pretty central part
of making an application work, so we should do it for our example.
The fact that the examples are uninstalled makes this a little
more complicated.
I disconnected signals in dispose() to avoid a visible-tab
change notification during destruction, but this is clunky.
Instead, make the notify::visible-tab signal handler bail out
early when called during destruction.
Add a new example to the getting started part of the docs. The focus
of this example is on 'new stuff': GtkApplication, templates, settings,
gmenu, gaction, GtkStack, GtkHeaderBar, GtkSearchBar, GtkRevealer,
GtkListBox, GtkMenuButton, etc.
It is being developed in several steps. Each step is put in a separate
directory below examples/: application1, ..., application8. This is a
little repetitive, but lets us use the code of all examples in the
documentation.
