treelistmodel: Don't add items in reverse
Closes#5707
See merge request GNOME/gtk!5744
(cherry picked from commit c5a53f235a)
1718db14 treelistmodel: Don't add items in reverse
cd860beb Add a test for splicing treelistmodel
The test doesn't hold 2 references, it holds only one.
The reason one unref can cause a leak is that some backends - like X11 -
only destroy the surface once the DestroyNotify event from the X server
has come in.
testsuite: Be less verbose in accessor-apis test
Closes#5763
See merge request GNOME/gtk!5851
(cherry picked from commit 03b71a9759)
be5f2250 testsuite: Be less verbose in accessor-apis test
39583e40 testsuite: Allow accessors in interfaces
e47c0760 adjustment: Split out a function
75c47755 adjustment: sanity-check values when setting them
f393f70e listbase: Don't warn on scroll in empty list
In certain scenarios, address the issue where gnome.compile_resources
fails to transmit the present source directory. This is most notably
visible with MSBuild.
The GL renderer was creating sripes for nodes that were scaled in
particular ways, probably due to rounding errors.
This testsuite focuses on one of those stripes to make sure they are
gone.
This test fails if we naively create fullscale
intermediate offscreens. This was fixed in the
previous commits.
This tests the fixes in 22ba6b1f33 (for
cairo) and 3a0152b65f (for GL).
The previous code would include CSS padding/margin/border in the
measurement and that is wrong.
Until commit a96c75ff02 this was not actually visible, but afterwards
listitems were allocated 16px too wide.
Test included
The design patterns using statusbar are no longer popular,
and it is pretty easy to make a statusbar yourself with boxes
and labels, if you need one. The only thing special about
GtkStatusbar was its window resize handle, but that has
been gone for a long time.
The unaligned-offscreen and upside-down-label-3d tests are failing after
upgrading our CI images, seemingly because of some font rendering issue
that is hard to track. Let's use the "failing" testsuite mechanism that
we also use for the reftests.
These tests can be run manually, but are not suitable for use as an
acceptance test, so let's not make frameworks like Debian's autopkgtest
run these when they run ginsttest-runner in the most obvious way.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
There are two possible interpretations of "expected failure": either
the test *must* fail (exactly the inverse of an ordinary test, with
success becoming failure and failure becoming success), or the test
*may* fail (with success intended, but failure possible in some
environments). Autotools had the second interpretation, which seems
more useful in practice, but Meson has the first.
Instead of using should_fail, we can put the tests in one of two new
suites: "flaky" is intended for tests that succeed or fail unpredictably
according to the test environment or chance, while "failing" is for
tests that ought to succeed but currently never do as a result of a
bug or missing functionality. With a sufficiently new version of Meson,
the flaky and failing tests are not run by default, but can be requested
by running a setup that does not exclude them, with a command like:
meson test --setup=x11_unstable --suite=flaky --suite=failing
As a bonus, now that we're setting up setups and their excluded suites
programmatically, the gsk-compare-broadway tests are also excluded by
default when running the test setup for a non-broadway backend.
When running the tests in CI, --suite=gtk overrides the default
exclude_suites, so we have to specify --no-suite=flaky and
--no-suite=failing explicitly.
This arrangement is inspired by GNOME/glib!2987, which was contributed
by Marco Trevisan.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
