This change comprises four main parts:
* the creation of the widgets that form the decorations,
* implementation of get_preferred_height/width, and the for_width/for_height
variants,
* taking the decorations into account when allocating,
* and drawing the decorations themselves.
Kristian did the bulk of the original work on this but any bugs are almost
certainly mine through the many refactorings and rebasings.
Update the documentation and users of this function to handle
the future case that that we have some internal decorations to the window and
useable allocation is thus smaller.
By having a separate out parameter there is no need to have an in/out function
and allows for greater robustness.
The current implementation simply returns the allocation provided.
For gtk_text_iter_get_char(), due to the "Returns" at the beginning of
the description, the description was not visible. So the first sentence
has been reworded.
If there are rows that contain only spanning children,
our algorithm was unnecessarily distributing extra space
to the other rows, even if they contain only non-expanding
children.
We improve the behaviour by treating rows containing only
spanning children as expanding.
... instead of taking the last one we find. This is necessary as
attached widgets (mostly menus) can be attached to an invisible widget,
but we still want to invalidate styles for them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695772
When setting new text on the label, the text-changed::delete signal
needs to be emitted before deleting the text (so that atk-bridge can
query the old text) while the text-changed::insert event needs to happen
afterwards (for the same reason). The old code using the notify signal
was only emitted after changing the text.
Converts usage of Avahi API to DBus calls. This change allows
us to remove dependency on avahi-gobject and avoids of possible
circular dependency.
Lists printers if Gtk+ is compiled with CUPS 1.6 or newer.
The cursor theme and size settting code was ifdefed to only
be compiled with the X11 backend, but it didn't check for
running under X at runtime. Fix that.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/695495
Both of them started to make use of round(), a C99 function. So, include
fallback-c89.c to provide a fallback implementation for round() for
compilers that don't have round()
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694339
Change of plans to match the tests from the previous commit.
The state of the underlying dialog is never reflected by GtkFileChooserButton's API,
as the dialog is a transient thing. The file chooser button only updates its state from the dialog,
and reflects the dialog's state, when the dialog has been confirmed and dismissed by the user.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
We used to have numeric names, which are a pain to maintain when new tests are added.
Now we have a real nomenclature (see the comment at the beginning of the open-dialog-cancel-* tests),
which lets us see easily if we have tested all the combinations.
Also, added all the combinations that were missing and removed redundant tests.
Not all the tests pass currently.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
The idea is that the button will only update its state of the selection and current folder
when changes to those are done either by the calling program (with the filechooser's API)
or when the user actually confirms and dismisses the underlying GtkFileChooserDialog.
If the user makes changes to the dialog but has not dismissed it yet, those changes
will not be reflected in the button (as one would expect).
This commit also makes sure the current-folder-changed and selection-changed signals
are emitted at the right times.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
We only emitted that signal when the selection changed through the underlying GtkFileChooserDialog.
To do this when the dialog is not active and the selection is changed by the calling program
(instead of by the user), we need to wait until the GtkFileChooserButton's UI has been updated
via an async callback from GIO. So, we keep track of whether an entry point into the
button's API caused a programmatic change in the selection.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This should let tests complete faster. Also, this will let us test
that the correct signals are actually being emitted.
The tests now fail, as the signals are not being emitted when they
should.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
