This tests both a sequence being claimed early to be then denied
(and handled deeper in propagation chain), and a sequence being
claimed late in the capture phase (and thus being cancelled deeper
in the propagation chain)
Before this change, a sequence being claimed deep in the event propagation
chain would make the sequence go denied on every ancestor, regardless of
previous state.
To make things more consistent, only deny the sequence if it was previously
claimed, so the behavior is the same for gesture groups within the widget
than for those outside the widget.
The gestures testsuite has been updated to reflect this new behavior.
It might happen that a gesture claims a sequence before any other gesture
in its group even handled a single event from that sequence. In that case,
ensure the state is set accordingly right when the sequence is handled in
those.
The "group" gesture testcase has been updated to observe this behavior.
This test check that resizing the window when expanding
the expander yields the same end result as having the
expander expanded to begin with. The test uses the inhibit
mechanism introduced in the previous commit.
This adds an inhibit api that code from the reftest module
can use to delay the taking of the snapshot. Also refactor
the code in gtk-reftest to use the inhibit mechanism for
its own delaying of the snapshot until after the first
expose.
This reftest makes use of the new feature to add signal handlers.
It adds a libreftest.so module containing all the code for the reftests.
When adding a test named reftest.ui, please keep code contained in a
source file names reftest.c and add that file to Makefile.am.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730833
When connecting signal names, gtk-reftest now allows you to use a colon
in the signal handler name like so:
module:function_name
where module is a module loaded from the same directory (or the .libs
subdirectory for compatibility with uninstalled libtool) as the running
test and the function is resolved in that module. Of course, normal
function names work as before.
This test just checks that all the icon names that GTK uses are present
in the default icon theme.
As icon names are not checked programmatically and we do not want to run
into missing-icon icons in the code, this test seems necessary.
For now, it's just a stub that tests stock icons.
To make the icontheme test run successfully when installed,
we need to use the correct test-framework-provided location,
and we need to install the test theme without stripping its
subdirectory structure.
This test is a bit brittle because it doesn't properly rely on CSS
properties but needs to use widget style properties to turn of extra
sizing from widgets.
It might break in the future when porting widgets to draw properly.
