The code was written under the assumption that the corners of
the rounded rect are disjoint. If they aren't, there are a few
more cases to consider.
Fixes: #6440
These 2 rectangles used to intersect fine:
0 0 50 50 / 50 0
0 0 50 50 / 0 50
But the computed result was:
0 0 50 50 / 50
which is not a valid rectangle, because the corners overlap.
Make sure such rectangles return NOT_REPRESENTABLE.
The above rectangle has been added to the testsuite.
Add a bunch of inline functions for graphene_rectangle_t.
We use those quite extensively in tight loops so making them as fast as
possible via inlining has massive benefits.
The current render-heavy benchmark I am playing (th paris-30k in node-editor)
went from 49fps to 85fps on my AMD.
Using clear avoids the shader engine (see last commit), so if we can get
pixels out of it, we should.
So we detect the overlap with the rounded corners of the clip region and
emit shaders for those, but then use Clear() for the rest.
With this in place, widget-factory on my integrated Intel TigerLake gets
a 60% performance boost.
The idea is that for a rectangle intersection, each corner of the
result is either entirely part of one original rectangle or it is
an intersection point.
By detecting those 2 cases and treating them differently, we can
simplify the code to compare rounded rectangles.
gsk_rounded_rect_contains_rect was calling
gsk_rounded_rect_contains_point, which potentially
checks all four corners, for a total of up to 16
corner/point checks. But there is no need to do
more than 4 such checks to answer the question.
graphene treats equality for contains() operations as always matching,
so do the same thing.
This is because unlike integer math, floating point cannot do the "as
close as possible to the point, but not reaching it" operation that
integer does by just subtracting 1.
Previously, when borders were too big - ie when a 100x100 rect had only
one 100x100 border, like the black part of ◔ - and then shrinking this
rect by 25px on either side, we'd end up with a 50x50 rect with a 75x75
border, and that's obviously not correct.
This includes a copy of the diff(1) algorithm used by git diff by Davide
Libenzi.
It's used for the common case ofcontainer nodes having only very few
changes for the few nodes of child widgets that changed (like a button
lighting up when hilighted or a spinning spinner).
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
This was showing up quite high on the profiles, and there is
no real reason for copy to normalize, as the source is a
GskRoundedRect which should be normalized already unless
you did something very strange (and then you should have normalized
manually).
This is now tracking the clips added by the clip nodes.
If any particular node can't deal with a clip, it falls back to Cairo
rendering. But if it can, it will render it directly.
