We add the app-menu and menubar public APIs to GtkApplication while
leaving the implementation in GApplication.
The actual implementation will be moved soon.
This feels premature; we do have the fallback situation covered
adaequately with the menubar, and people can do their own creative
solutions with gtk_application_window_get_menu(), so we don't have
to offer a widget for this right now.
The function returns the part of a monitors area that should be
used for positioning popups, menus, etc. The only non-trivial
implementation atm is in the X backend, all the other backends
just return the full monitor area. The X implementation is
currently suboptimal, since it requires roundtrips to collect
the necessary information. It should be changed to monitor
the properties for changes, when XFixes allows to monitor
individual properties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641999
For maximized windows, titlebars cannot be used to reposition or
scale the window, so if an application does not use it to convey
useful information (other than the application name), the screen
space occupied by titlebars could be put to better use.
Add a new window property which requests from the window manager
to hide titlebars when windows are maximized to account for this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665616
If the scale has an origin (it will have one by default), GtkRange will
render the two sides before/after the current value with different style
classes, making it possible for themes to use different colors and
properties for the two areas.
This was possible in GTK 2 with style details, but got lost during the
road to 3.0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665140
The new function provides an API that takes the PangoLayout and index
as input params, this way it handles strong and weak cursors internally
factoring out all code duplicated in the widgets that need to render
cursors.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640317
This is useful to e.g. theme notebook tabs differently according to
their position directly from the CSS sheet.
GtkNotebook support in a separate commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659777
GtkFontButton already has a property named "font-name" which may
conflict / be an ABI break when moving GtkFontButton to implement
GtkFontChooser. Also, this is more in line with how other parts in
gtk (e.g. GtkCellRendererText) call a font string property.
Make the GtkFontChooser API similar to the Gtk{File,Recent,App}Chooser
APIs by introducing GtkFontChooser as an interface, that has a default
implementation in GtkFontChooserWidget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657627
This struct keeps track of an area of text in a CSS file and uses it
when specifying information. Also, the cssprovider keeps track of
sections when parsing a file.
This commit introduces a new setting, gtk-visible-focus, backed
by the Gtk/VisibleFocus X setting. Its three values control how
focus rectangles are displayed.
'always' is equivalent to the traditional GTK+ behaviour of always
rendering focus rectangles.
'never' does what it says, and is intended for keyboardless
situations, e.g. tablets.
'automatic' hides focus rectangles initially, until the user
interacts with the keyboard, at which point focus rectangles
become visible.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649567
This way themes can use GtkComboBox.combobox-entry to match that
specific case, and GtkComboBox.combobox-entry .button to match the
button/arrow side of the widget.
This function can be used to find the GdkDevice wrapping
an XInput2 device ID. For core devices, the Virtual Core
Pointer/Keyboard IDs (2/3) may be used.
This function can be used to find out the XInput2 device ID
behind a GdkDevice, mostly useful when you need to interact
with say Clutter, or raw libXi calls.
The doc build for that is currently broken, and libgail-util is
undergoing reconstructive surgery anyway, currently.
Or maybe it'll turn out to be an amputation...
The function is supposed to bypass the ATK registry. For 2 reasons:
1) We get rid of a lot of boilerplate madness.
2) The registry allows creating multiple accessibles per widget and we
don't.
The old code for registries is still there.
The table was incomplete and out of date. Instead, just
put a list of links in that place, and move all the extra
documentation to the macros. Bug 653785
Inheritance is now done using style property flags, so thereis no ned
anymore to clobber the pspec flags namespace.
Also, there is no need to expose this functionality in the public API
without exposing more of the styleproperty API.
This essentially reverts commit 9bfd3d2eec.
This is a special-purpose button that can be used together with
GPermission objects to control the sensitivity of system settings.
Suitable permission objects can e.g. be obtained from PolicyKit.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626457
