Only return one accumulated scroll event per frame.
Compress them by adding up the deltas.
Still missing: a way to capture history, like
we do for motion events.
Fixes: #2800
The api to configure surfaces is now GdkToplevelLayout
and GdkPopupLayout. Unfortunately, there's still quite
a bit of internal use of GdkGeometry that will take some
time to clean up, so move it go gdkinternals.h for now.
The api to configure surfaces is now GdkToplevelLayout
and GdkPopupLayout. Unfortunately, there's still quite
a bit of internal use of GdkGeometry that will take some
time to clean up, so move it go gdkinternals.h for now.
With the removal of `gdk_seat_grab` we do not need to keep the
definitions of `GdkGrabStatus` and `GdkGrabOwnership` public.
Move those definitions to become internal only.
Rearrange a few things, and move some booleans
into the Any struct, by using a bitfield there.
Some more cleanup could be done - the flags field
with its PENDING and FLUSHED members appears
entirely unused. Nobody is setting those flags.
This adds a GDK_DEBUG=default-settings flag which disables reads
from xsettings and Xft resources, and enables this for the testsuite.
This is one less way to get different testresults depending on the
environment. In particular, it was failing the css tests for me
due to getting the wrong font size because i have a different dpi.
Windows/surface's aren't supposed to be explicitly moved by any external
part, so don't provide API for doing so. Usage throughout Gdk is
replaced by the corresponding backend variants.
Root coordinates are going away, so this
api does not make sense anymore. Use
gdk_surface_get_device_position instead.
We still keep this as internal api for
root-coordinate using backends.
We don't need the complicated wrapper system anymore,
since client-side windows are gone. This commit moves
all the vfuncs to GtkSurfaceClass, and changes the
backends to just derive their surface implementation
from GdkSurface.
All the information in it is already contained
in the surface object we pass along, and none
of the backend implementations were using the
attributes at all.
We are not creating such surfaces anymore, and
they were only ever meaningfully implemented
on X11. Drop the concept, and the api for determining
if a surface is input-only.
We still need to keep the vfunc around, since the
fallback implementation of gdk_display_get_monitor_at_surface
uses it. So, a GDK backend must either have root coordinates
or always return a monitor from monitor_at_surface.
We still need to keep the vfunc around, since the
fallback implementation for move_to_rect uses it.
So, a GDK backend must either have root coordinates
or implement move_to_rect.
