Under circumstances I haven't fully tracked down,
these demos refuse to run, failing to locate their
callbacks. So use the machinery we have, and set up
a GtkBuilderCScope for each of the problematic cases.
If we don't set the alignment then there is a chance that it ends up
commonly on a 4-byte boundary and GResources will have to malloc/memcpy
the static data.
With --set-section-alignment (which takes a byte offset not ^2) available
in objcopy >= 2.33 we ensure that expectation is met.
Our default theme is now Default, not Adwaita, & HighContrastInverse was
renamed to Default-hc. So these checks did not work anymore. Rather than
hard-coding the new names, & possibly running into the same issue again,
we can just look for the convention of appending -dark to the theme name
and/or the Settings:prefer-dark-theme prop. The latter, we can & likely
SHOULD also apply to all themes - not just ours as before. We also check
for the :dark suffix as that means the theme variant - & before checking
GtkSettings check the GTK_THEME env var, just as GtkSettings itself does
- 25 chars sounds about right for the texts we use
- don't use min width so we allow shrinking the widget (large text or
small mobile devices)
- ellipsize the text instead of clipping it.
There were 3 different random numbers set to determine the sidebar width
and all of them were wrong. Remove them.
Instead, propagate the natural width of the listitems.
Since the corresponding source files do not include "config.h", and are
not compiled with `GTK_COMPILATION`, they will generate the wrong symbol
exporting under Windows.
Instead of injecting `-fvisibility=hidden` depending on a compiler check
ourselves, let Meson do it for us.
This also avoids us having to filter `-fvisibility=hidden` when reusing
the common compiler flags.
It turns out that the old behavior of GTK_ALIGN_BASELINE
was actually used in libadwaita, so bring it back, and
introduce a new GtkAlign value for the new behavior.
This makes the question if a listitem can be focused or not an explicit
decision by application developers.
Previously an item could be focused if it was selectable and no child or
grandchild was focusable - so if you put a label and icon into it, the
item was focusable, but if you put a GtkTreeExpander or a GtkButton into
it, the item wasn't. This needs to be decided explicitly now.
Technically this is an API break, because the previous behavior does not
exist anymore.
But I really don't want to make this a tristate (focusable, not
focusable, automatic), because then binding it to other things gets
hard, and because all the other focusable proeprties are booleans, too,
and working with them gets a lot harder.
Related: #3910
