The test ensures that offscreens render to the same pixel grid as the
actual image, and they are not offset by fractions of a pixel.
The Cairo renderer fails here because Cairo's clipping code rounds pixel
values wrong.
Testcase included
The code was writing invalid memory, so this might not have always
crashed, but I did my best to write the test so it causes a SEGV.
Also included is a fix for the testsuite where the expected result was
wrong.
The replayed node/images weren't saved.
I wanted to check that an optimization is done when replaying a test,
but without a saved node file, I couldn't.
It is not material to this test, and it causes some hard to
understand problem with fontconfigs use of mmap, leading to
a sporadic segfaults in pangos fontconfig thread.
This test fails on my system currently, since rawhide libpng appears
to have changed the encoding of pngs so that the texture nodes no
longer match the reference. This will be a problem as long as our
ci systems have an older libpng, so disable this test for now.
These 2 rectangles used to intersect fine:
0 0 50 50 / 50 0
0 0 50 50 / 0 50
But the computed result was:
0 0 50 50 / 50
which is not a valid rectangle, because the corners overlap.
Make sure such rectangles return NOT_REPRESENTABLE.
The above rectangle has been added to the testsuite.
There are some tests that generate large images.
However, if we mask that image, we might have to generate offscreens
both for the source and for the mask.
And if we do that, it can take a long time. And especially on CI with
software rendering, that can quickly become noticable and result in
timeouts.
This test tests that shadows that are offset to outside the clip region
but where the blur goes back into the clip region get correctly drawn
and not optimized away.
To view what the test actually draws, remove at least the color-matrix
- it's only used so the blurring algorithm doesn't cause different
results - and maybe also the clip node.
The test existed in git but wasn't hooked up. So let's do that by:
1. Adding it to the build
2. Adapting it a bit so rounding errors really don't trigger (as the
original commit claimed they shouldn't).
3. Re-renaming it because this was actually about 3d gradients
The actual gradient line is covered by blocks, so there are no
artifacts. But if a renderer screws this up, the blue/red will seep
through these blocks.
Mask nodes are transparent outside of the intersection of source and
mask, unless the mask ode is inverted alpha.
Set the bounds accordingly.
Tests have been updated accordingly.
This test tests multiple things:
1. That huge contents are properly clipped by repeat nodes, even if the
repeat happens in the visible part
2. That repeating only horizontally or only vertically is done quickly
via offscreens when lots of repeating is done
Test that if the child is a texture that extends the child bounds, that
extension does not get repeated when rendering.
This can easily happen when the child is not drawn as an offscreen, but
instead the texture cache is consulted and no check for matching size is
done.
When we test repeat nodes, make sure we round the size of the original
node up to an integer.
The reference image for the node is a rounded up, so when we generate a
new reference image we cannot deal with anything else.
Fixes huge-width test with --repeat.
Instead of using "-3d" to exclude Cairo rendering, use "-no$renderer" to
allow excluding any renderer.
And because we use contains() for the check, we can exclude multiple
renderers by naming the test sth like "test-nogl-nocairo.node"
This is the result of experimenting with corner cases when blurring.
The result is a test that tests when the child of a blur node is
clipped out but the blurred child is not, the blurred parts are still
visible.
This immediately broke the cairo renderer, so the fix is included.
These are 2x2 combinations that:
1. Use a texture child node vs a color child node
This should force an offscreen vs straight up use a texture.
2. Switch opacity and color-matrix
Either put the color matrix into the opacity node or put the opacity
into the color matrix.
This is worth testing because renderers often combine opacity into the
color matrix to avoid offscreens.
And they do that because applications often create faded out symbolic
images, which end up as a combination of these nodes.
