mirror of
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk.git
synced 2024-11-10 10:50:10 +00:00
221 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
221 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
README for gtk+/perf
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
This is a framework for testing performance in GTK+. For GTK+, being
|
|
performant does not only mean "paint widgets fast". It also means
|
|
things like the time needed to set up widgets, to map and draw a
|
|
window for the first time, and emitting/propagating signals.
|
|
|
|
The following is accurate as of 2006/Jun/14.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Background
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
A widget's lifetime looks more or less like this:
|
|
|
|
1. Instantiation
|
|
2. Size request
|
|
3. Size allocate
|
|
5. Realize
|
|
4. Map
|
|
5. Expose
|
|
6. Destroy
|
|
|
|
Some of these stages are particularly interesting:
|
|
|
|
- Instantiation means creating the widget. This may be as simple as a
|
|
few malloc()s and setting some fields. It could also be a
|
|
complicated operation if the widget needs to contact an external
|
|
server to create itself, or if it needs to read data files.
|
|
|
|
- Size requisition is when GTK+ asks the widget, "how big do you want
|
|
to be on the screen"? This can be an expensive operation. The
|
|
widget has to measure its text, measure its icons (and thus load its
|
|
icons), and generally run through its internal layout code.
|
|
|
|
- Realization is when the widget creates its GDK resources, like its
|
|
GdkWindow and graphics contexts it may need. This could be
|
|
expensive if the widget needs to load data files for cursors or
|
|
backgrounds.
|
|
|
|
- Expose is when the widget gets repainted. This will happen many
|
|
times throughout the lifetime of the widget: every time you drag a
|
|
window on top of it, every time its data changes and it needs to
|
|
redraw, every time it gets resized.
|
|
|
|
GtkWidgetProfiler is a mechanism to let you get individual timings for
|
|
each of the stages in the lifetime of a widget. It also lets you run
|
|
some stages many times in a sequence, so that you can run a real
|
|
profiler and get an adequate number of samples. For example,
|
|
GtkWidgetProfiler lets you say "repaint this widget 1000 times".
|
|
|
|
Why is this not as simple as doing
|
|
|
|
start_timer ();
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
|
|
gtk_widget_queue_draw (widget);
|
|
while (gtk_events_pending ())
|
|
gtk_main_iteration ();
|
|
}
|
|
stop_timer ();
|
|
|
|
Huh?
|
|
|
|
Because X is an asynchronous window system. So, when you send the
|
|
"paint" commands, your program will regain control but it will take
|
|
some time for the X server to actually process those commands.
|
|
GtkWidgetProfiler has special code to wait for the X server and give
|
|
you accurate timings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the framework
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Right now the framework is very simple; it just has utility functions
|
|
to time widget creation, mapping, exposure, and destruction. To run
|
|
such a test, you use the GtkWidgetProfiler object in
|
|
gtkwidgetprofiler.h.
|
|
|
|
The gtk_widget_profiler_profile_boot() function will emit the
|
|
"create-widget" signal so that you can create your widget for
|
|
testing. It will then take timings for the widget, and emit the
|
|
"report" signal as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
The "create-widget" signal:
|
|
|
|
The handler has this form:
|
|
|
|
GtkWidget *create_widget_callback (GtkWidgetProfiler *profiler,
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
You need to create a widget in your handler, and return it. Do not
|
|
show the widget; the profiler will do that by itself at the right
|
|
time, and will actually complain if you show the widget.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The "report" signal:
|
|
|
|
This function will get called when the profiler wants to report that
|
|
it finished timing an important stage in the lifecycle of your
|
|
widget. The handler has this form:
|
|
|
|
void report_callback (GtkWidgetProfiler *profiler,
|
|
GtkWidgetProfilerReport report,
|
|
GtkWidget *widget,
|
|
gdouble elapsed,
|
|
gpointer user_data);
|
|
|
|
The "report" argument tells you what happened to your widget:
|
|
|
|
GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_CREATE. A timer gets started right
|
|
before the profiler emits the "create-widget" signal,, and it gets
|
|
stopped when your callback returns with the new widget. This
|
|
measures the time it takes to set up your widget, but not show it.
|
|
|
|
GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_MAP. A timer gets started right before
|
|
the profiler calls gtk_widget_show_all() on your widget, and it
|
|
gets stopped when the the widget has been mapped.
|
|
|
|
GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_EXPOSE. A timer gets started right before
|
|
the profiler starts waiting for GTK+ and the X server to finish
|
|
painting your widget, and it gets stopped when the widget is fully
|
|
painted to the screen.
|
|
|
|
GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_DESTROY. A timer gets started right
|
|
before the profiler calls gtk_widget_destroy() on your widget, and
|
|
it gets stopped when gtk_widget_destroy() returns.
|
|
|
|
As a very basic example of using GtkWidgetProfiler is this:
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
#include <gtk/gtk.h>
|
|
#include "gtkwidgetprofiler.h"
|
|
|
|
static GtkWidget *
|
|
create_widget_cb (GtkWidgetProfiler *profiler, gpointer data)
|
|
{
|
|
GtkWidget *window;
|
|
|
|
window = gtk_window_new (GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
|
|
/* ... fill the window with widgets, and don't show them ... */
|
|
|
|
return window;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
report_cb (GtkWidgetProfiler *profiler, GtkWidgetProfilerReport report, GtkWidget *widget, gdouble elapsed, gpointer data)
|
|
{
|
|
const char *type;
|
|
|
|
switch (report) {
|
|
case GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_CREATE:
|
|
type = "widget creation";
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_MAP:
|
|
type = "widget map";
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_EXPOSE:
|
|
type = "widget expose";
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_DESTROY:
|
|
type = "widget destruction";
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
g_assert_not_reached ();
|
|
type = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fprintf (stderr, "%s: %g sec\n", type, elapsed);
|
|
|
|
if (report == GTK_WIDGET_PROFILER_REPORT_DESTROY)
|
|
fputs ("\n", stderr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
main (int argc, char **argv)
|
|
{
|
|
GtkWidgetProfiler *profiler;
|
|
|
|
gtk_init (&argc, &argv);
|
|
|
|
profiler = gtk_widget_profiler_new ();
|
|
g_signal_connect (profiler, "create-widget",
|
|
G_CALLBACK (create_widget_cb), NULL);
|
|
g_signal_connect (profiler, "report",
|
|
G_CALLBACK (report_cb), NULL);
|
|
|
|
gtk_widget_profiler_set_num_iterations (profiler, 100);
|
|
gtk_widget_profiler_profile_boot (profiler);
|
|
|
|
gtk_widget_profiler_profile_expose (profiler);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Getting meaningful results
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Getting times for widget creation/mapping/exposing/destruction is
|
|
interesting, but how do you actually find the places that need
|
|
optimizing?
|
|
|
|
Why, you run the tests under a profiler, of course.
|
|
|
|
FIXME: document how to do this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedback
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
Please mail your feedback to Federico Mena-Quintero <federico@novell.com>.
|
|
This performance framework is a work in progress.
|