Benjamin Otte ccdc3ee406 selector: Make :not() selectors not radical ... :not() selectors cannot be radical because the bloomfilter only knows if a value is set in any of the nodes, but cannot determine the opposite (if a value is not set in at least one node), but that would be required for:not() selectors. However, this is very unlikely to happen in the real world, so it's not worth optimizing. Unfortunately, change tracking could know this, so by excluding the :not() selectors from radical changes, the change tracking will now pick them up. If that turns out to be a performance problem, we need to add a special category for radical not filters, so change tracking and bloom filters can deal with them. The testcase demonstrating the problem in widget-factory has been extrated and added.		2020-01-28 02:17:03 +01:00
..
change	selector: Make :not() selectors not radical	2020-01-28 02:17:03 +01:00
nodes	node tests: Update expected output	2020-01-17 23:47:34 -05:00
parser	testsuite: Improve diff_with_file() function	2020-01-28 02:17:03 +01:00
style	selector: Make :not() selectors not radical	2020-01-28 02:17:03 +01:00
api.c	cssprovider: Return void, not TRUE	2016-10-17 17:41:03 +02:00
api.test.in	Test suite cosmetics	2017-10-18 17:30:20 +02:00
data.c	css: Add gtk_css_data_url_parse()	2019-05-12 17:27:01 +02:00
meson.build	testsuite: Update mark names	2020-01-23 23:48:43 -05:00