gtk2/gdk/gdkframeclockidle.c

808 lines
30 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* GDK - The GIMP Drawing Kit
* Copyright (C) 1995-1997 Peter Mattis, Spencer Kimball and Josh MacDonald
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
/*
* Modified by the GTK+ Team and others 1997-2010. See the AUTHORS
* file for a list of people on the GTK+ Team. See the ChangeLog
* files for a list of changes. These files are distributed with
* GTK+ at ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/.
*/
#include "config.h"
#include "gdkframeclockidleprivate.h"
2021-09-24 19:11:00 +00:00
#include "gdkdebug.h"
#include "gdkframeclockprivate.h"
#include "gdk-private.h"
#include "gdkprofilerprivate.h"
#ifdef G_OS_WIN32
#include <windows.h>
#endif
#define FRAME_INTERVAL 16667 /* microseconds */
typedef enum {
SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_VALID = 0, /* explicit, since we count on zero-init */
SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_FIRST,
SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_DRAWN,
} SmoothDeltaState;
struct _GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate
{
gint64 frame_time; /* The exact time we last ran the clock cycle, or 0 if never */
gint64 smoothed_frame_time_base; /* A grid-aligned version of frame_time (grid size == refresh period), never more than half a grid from frame_time */
gint64 smoothed_frame_time_period; /* The grid size that smoothed_frame_time_base is aligned to */
gint64 smoothed_frame_time_reported; /* Ensures we are always monotonic */
gint64 smoothed_frame_time_phase; /* The offset of the first reported frame time, in the current animation sequence, from the preceding vsync */
gint64 min_next_frame_time; /* We're not synced to vblank, so wait at least until this before next cycle to avoid busy looping */
SmoothDeltaState smooth_phase_state; /* The state of smoothed_frame_time_phase - is it valid, awaiting vsync etc. Thanks to zero-init, the initial value
of smoothed_frame_time_phase is `0`. This is valid, since we didn't get a "frame drawn" event yet. Accordingly,
the initial value of smooth_phase_state is SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_VALID. See the comment in gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle()
for details. */
gint64 sleep_serial;
gint64 freeze_time; /* in microseconds */
guint flush_idle_id;
guint paint_idle_id;
guint freeze_count;
guint updating_count;
GdkFrameClockPhase requested;
GdkFrameClockPhase phase;
guint in_paint_idle : 1;
guint paint_is_thaw : 1;
#ifdef G_OS_WIN32
guint begin_period : 1;
#endif
};
static gboolean gdk_frame_clock_flush_idle (void *data);
static gboolean gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle (void *data);
G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_PRIVATE (GdkFrameClockIdle, gdk_frame_clock_idle, GDK_TYPE_FRAME_CLOCK)
static gint64 sleep_serial;
static gint64 sleep_source_prepare_time;
static GSource *sleep_source;
static gboolean
sleep_source_prepare (GSource *source,
2020-07-24 13:54:49 +00:00
int *timeout)
{
sleep_source_prepare_time = g_source_get_time (source);
*timeout = -1;
return FALSE;
}
static gboolean
sleep_source_check (GSource *source)
{
if (g_source_get_time (source) != sleep_source_prepare_time)
sleep_serial++;
return FALSE;
}
static gboolean
sleep_source_dispatch (GSource *source,
GSourceFunc callback,
gpointer user_data)
{
return TRUE;
}
static GSourceFuncs sleep_source_funcs = {
sleep_source_prepare,
sleep_source_check,
sleep_source_dispatch,
NULL /* finalize */
};
static gint64
get_sleep_serial (void)
{
if (sleep_source == NULL)
{
sleep_source = g_source_new (&sleep_source_funcs, sizeof (GSource));
g_source_set_priority (sleep_source, G_PRIORITY_HIGH);
g_source_attach (sleep_source, NULL);
g_source_unref (sleep_source);
}
return sleep_serial;
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_init (GdkFrameClockIdle *frame_clock_idle)
{
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv;
frame_clock_idle->priv = priv =
gdk_frame_clock_idle_get_instance_private (frame_clock_idle);
priv->freeze_count = 0;
priv->smoothed_frame_time_period = FRAME_INTERVAL;
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_dispose (GObject *object)
{
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (object)->priv;
if (priv->flush_idle_id != 0)
{
g_source_remove (priv->flush_idle_id);
priv->flush_idle_id = 0;
}
if (priv->paint_idle_id != 0)
{
g_source_remove (priv->paint_idle_id);
priv->paint_idle_id = 0;
}
#ifdef G_OS_WIN32
if (priv->begin_period)
{
timeEndPeriod(1);
priv->begin_period = FALSE;
}
#endif
G_OBJECT_CLASS (gdk_frame_clock_idle_parent_class)->dispose (object);
}
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
/* Note: This is never called on first frame, so
* smoothed_frame_time_base != 0 and we have a valid frame_interval. */
static gint64
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
compute_smooth_frame_time (GdkFrameClock *clock,
gint64 new_frame_time,
gboolean new_frame_time_is_vsync_related,
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
gint64 smoothed_frame_time_base,
gint64 frame_interval)
{
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock)->priv;
int frames_passed;
gint64 new_smoothed_time;
gint64 current_error;
gint64 correction_magnitude;
/* Consecutive frame, assume it is an integer number of frames later, so round to nearest such */
/* NOTE: This is >= 0, because smoothed_frame_time_base is < frame_interval/2 from old_frame_time
* and new_frame_time >= old_frame_time. */
frames_passed = (new_frame_time - smoothed_frame_time_base + frame_interval / 2) / frame_interval;
/* We use an approximately whole number of frames in the future from
* last smoothed frame time. This way we avoid minor jitter in the
* frame times making the animation speed uneven, but still animate
* evenly in case of whole frame skips. */
new_smoothed_time = smoothed_frame_time_base + frames_passed * frame_interval;
/* However, sometimes the smoothed time is too much off from the
* real time. For example, if the first frame clock cycle happened
* not due to a frame rendering but an input event, then
* new_frame_time could happen to be near the middle between two
* frames. If that happens and we then start regularly animating at
* the refresh_rate, then the jitter in the real time may cause us
* to randomly sometimes round up, and sometimes down.
*
* To combat this we converge the smooth time towards the real time
* in a way that is slow when they are near and fast when they are
* far from each other.
*
* This is done by using the square of the error as the correction
* magnitude. I.e. if the error is 0.5 frame, we correct by
* 0.5*0.5=0.25 frame, if the error is 0.25 we correct by 0.125, if
* the error is 0.1, frame we correct by 0.01 frame, etc.
*
* The actual computation is:
* (current_error/frame_interval)*(current_error/frame_interval)*frame_interval
* But this can be simplified as below.
*
* Note: We only do this correction if the new frame is caused by a
* thaw of the frame clock, so that we know the time is actually
* related to the physical vblank. For frameclock cycles triggered
* by other events we always step up in whole frames from the last
* reported time.
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
*/
if (new_frame_time_is_vsync_related)
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
{
current_error = new_smoothed_time - new_frame_time;
correction_magnitude = current_error * current_error / frame_interval; /* Note, this is always > 0 due to the square */
if (current_error > 0)
new_smoothed_time -= correction_magnitude;
else
new_smoothed_time += correction_magnitude;
}
/* Ensure we're always monotonic */
if (new_smoothed_time <= priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported)
new_smoothed_time = priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
return new_smoothed_time;
}
static gint64
gdk_frame_clock_idle_get_frame_time (GdkFrameClock *clock)
{
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock)->priv;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
gint64 now;
gint64 new_smoothed_time;
/* can't change frame time during a paint */
if (priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE &&
priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS &&
(priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT || priv->in_paint_idle))
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
return priv->smoothed_frame_time_base;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
/* Outside a paint, pick something smoothed close to now */
now = g_get_monotonic_time ();
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
/* First time frame, just return something */
if (priv->smoothed_frame_time_base == 0)
{
priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported = now;
return now;
}
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
/* Since time is monotonic this is <= what we will pick for the next cycle, but
more likely than not it will be equal if we're doing a constant animation. */
new_smoothed_time = compute_smooth_frame_time (clock, now, FALSE,
priv->smoothed_frame_time_base,
priv->smoothed_frame_time_period);
priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported = new_smoothed_time;
return new_smoothed_time;
}
#define RUN_FLUSH_IDLE(priv) \
((priv)->freeze_count == 0 && \
((priv)->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS) != 0)
/* The reason why we track updating_count separately here and don't
* just add GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_UPDATE into ->request on every frame
* is so that we can avoid doing one more frame when an animation
* is cancelled.
*/
#define RUN_PAINT_IDLE(priv) \
((priv)->freeze_count == 0 && \
(((priv)->requested & ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS) != 0 || \
(priv)->updating_count > 0))
static void
maybe_start_idle (GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle,
gboolean caused_by_thaw)
{
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
if (RUN_FLUSH_IDLE (priv) || RUN_PAINT_IDLE (priv))
{
guint min_interval = 0;
if (priv->min_next_frame_time != 0)
{
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
gint64 now = g_get_monotonic_time ();
gint64 min_interval_us = MAX (priv->min_next_frame_time, now) - now;
min_interval = (min_interval_us + 500) / 1000;
}
if (priv->flush_idle_id == 0 && RUN_FLUSH_IDLE (priv))
{
GSource *source;
priv->flush_idle_id = g_timeout_add_full (GDK_PRIORITY_EVENTS + 1,
min_interval,
gdk_frame_clock_flush_idle,
g_object_ref (clock_idle),
(GDestroyNotify) g_object_unref);
source = g_main_context_find_source_by_id (NULL, priv->flush_idle_id);
g_source_set_static_name (source, "[gtk] gdk_frame_clock_flush_idle");
}
if (!priv->in_paint_idle &&
priv->paint_idle_id == 0 && RUN_PAINT_IDLE (priv))
{
priv->paint_is_thaw = caused_by_thaw;
priv->paint_idle_id = g_timeout_add_full (GDK_PRIORITY_REDRAW,
min_interval,
gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle,
g_object_ref (clock_idle),
(GDestroyNotify) g_object_unref);
gdk_source_set_static_name_by_id (priv->paint_idle_id, "[gtk] gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle");
}
}
}
static void
maybe_stop_idle (GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle)
{
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
if (priv->flush_idle_id != 0 && !RUN_FLUSH_IDLE (priv))
{
g_source_remove (priv->flush_idle_id);
priv->flush_idle_id = 0;
}
if (priv->paint_idle_id != 0 && !RUN_PAINT_IDLE (priv))
{
g_source_remove (priv->paint_idle_id);
priv->paint_idle_id = 0;
}
}
static gboolean
gdk_frame_clock_flush_idle (void *data)
{
GdkFrameClock *clock = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK (data);
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
priv->flush_idle_id = 0;
if (priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE)
return FALSE;
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS;
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_flush_events (clock);
if ((priv->requested & ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS) != 0 ||
priv->updating_count > 0)
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT;
else
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE;
g_clear_handle_id (&priv->paint_idle_id, g_source_remove);
gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle (data);
return FALSE;
}
/*
* Returns the positive remainder.
*
* As an example, lets consider (-5) % 16:
*
* (-5) % 16 = (0 * 16) + (-5) = -5
*
* If we only want positive remainders, we can instead calculate
*
* (-5) % 16 = (1 * 16) + (-5) = 11
*
* The built-in `%` operator returns the former, positive_modulo() returns the latter.
*/
static int
positive_modulo (int i, int n)
{
return (i % n + n) % n;
}
static gboolean
gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle (void *data)
{
GdkFrameClock *clock = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK (data);
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
gboolean skip_to_resume_events;
GdkFrameTimings *timings = NULL;
gint64 before G_GNUC_UNUSED;
before = GDK_PROFILER_CURRENT_TIME;
priv->paint_idle_id = 0;
priv->in_paint_idle = TRUE;
priv->min_next_frame_time = 0;
skip_to_resume_events =
(priv->requested & ~(GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS | GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_RESUME_EVENTS)) == 0 &&
priv->updating_count == 0;
if (priv->phase > GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT)
{
timings = gdk_frame_clock_get_current_timings (clock);
}
if (!skip_to_resume_events)
{
switch (priv->phase)
{
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_FLUSH_EVENTS:
break;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE:
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT:
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
gint64 frame_interval = FRAME_INTERVAL;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
GdkFrameTimings *prev_timings = gdk_frame_clock_get_current_timings (clock);
if (prev_timings && prev_timings->refresh_interval)
frame_interval = prev_timings->refresh_interval;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
priv->frame_time = g_get_monotonic_time ();
/*
* The first clock cycle of an animation might have been triggered by some external event. An external
* event can be an input event, an expired timer, data arriving over the network etc. This can happen at
* any time, so the cycle could have been scheduled at some random time rather then immediately after a
* frame completion. The offset between the start of the first animation cycle and the preceding vsync is
* called the "phase" of the clock cycle start time (not to be confused with the phase of the frame
* clock).
*
* In this first clock cycle, the "smooth" frame time is simply the time when the cycle was started. This
* could be followed by several cycles which are not vsync-related. As long as we don't get a "frame
* drawn" signal from the compositor, the clock cycles will occur every about frame_interval. Once we do
* get a "frame drawn" signal, from this point on the frame clock cycles will start shortly after the
* corresponding vsync signals, again every about frame_interval. The first vsync-related clock cycle
* might occur less than a refresh interval away from the last non-vsync-related cycle. See the diagram
* below for details. So while the cadence stays the same - a frame clock cycle every about frame_interval
* - the phase of the cycles start time has changed.
*
* Since we might have already reported the frame time to the application in the previous clock cycles, we
* have to adjust future reported frame times. We want the first vsync-related smooth time to be separated
* by exactly 1 frame_interval from the previous one, in order to maintain the regularity of the reported
* frame times. To achieve that, from this point on we add the phase of the first clock cycle start time to
* the smooth time. In order to compute that phase, accounting for possible skipped frames (e.g. due to
* compositor stalls), we want the following to be true:
*
* first_vsync_smooth_time = last_non_vsync_smooth_time + frame_interval * (1 + frames_skipped)
*
* We can assign the following known/desired values to the above equation:
*
* last_non_vsync_smooth_time = smoothed_frame_time_base
* first_vsync_smooth_time = frame_time + smoothed_frame_time_phase
*
* That leads us to the following, from which we can extract smoothed_frame_time_phase:
*
* frame_time + smoothed_frame_time_phase = smoothed_frame_time_base +
* frame_interval * (1 + frames_skipped)
*
* In the following diagram, '|' mark a vsync, '*' mark the start of a clock cycle, '+' is the adjusted
* frame time, '!' marks the reception of "frame drawn" events from the compositor. Note that the clock
* cycle cadence changed after the first vsync-related cycle. This cadence is kept even if we don't
* receive a 'frame drawn' signal in a subsequent frame, since then we schedule the clock at intervals of
* refresh_interval.
*
* vsync | | | | | |...
* frame drawn | | |! |! | |...
* cycle start | * | * |* |* |* |...
* adjusted times | * | * | + | + | + |...
* phase ^------^
*/
if (priv->smooth_phase_state == SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_FIRST)
{
/* First animation cycle - usually unrelated to vsync */
priv->smoothed_frame_time_base = 0;
priv->smoothed_frame_time_phase = 0;
priv->smooth_phase_state = SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_DRAWN;
}
else if (priv->smooth_phase_state == SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_DRAWN &&
priv->paint_is_thaw)
{
/* First vsync-related animation cycle, we can now compute the phase. We want the phase to satisfy
0 <= phase < frame_interval */
priv->smoothed_frame_time_phase =
positive_modulo (priv->smoothed_frame_time_base - priv->frame_time,
frame_interval);
priv->smooth_phase_state = SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_VALID;
}
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
if (priv->smoothed_frame_time_base == 0)
{
/* First frame ever, or first cycle in a new animation sequence. Ensure monotonicity */
priv->smoothed_frame_time_base = MAX (priv->frame_time, priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported);
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
}
else
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
{
/* compute_smooth_frame_time() ensures monotonicity */
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
priv->smoothed_frame_time_base =
compute_smooth_frame_time (clock, priv->frame_time + priv->smoothed_frame_time_phase,
priv->paint_is_thaw,
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
priv->smoothed_frame_time_base,
priv->smoothed_frame_time_period);
}
priv->smoothed_frame_time_period = frame_interval;
priv->smoothed_frame_time_reported = priv->smoothed_frame_time_base;
_gdk_frame_clock_begin_frame (clock);
/* Note "current" is different now so timings != prev_timings */
timings = gdk_frame_clock_get_current_timings (clock);
timings->frame_time = priv->frame_time;
frame-clock: New approach in smoothing frame clock In commit c6901a8b, the frame clock reported time was changed from simply reporting the time we ran the frame clock cycle to reporting a smoothed value that increased by the frame interval each time it was called. However, this change caused some problems, such as: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1415 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1416 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1482 I think a lot of this is caused by the fact that we just overwrote the old frame time with the smoothed, monotonous timestamp, breaking some things that relied on knowing the actual time something happened. This is a new approach to doing the smoothing that is more explicit. The "frame_time" we store is the actual time we ran the update cycle, and then we separately compute and store the derived smoothed time and its period, allowing us to easily return a smoothed time at any time by rounding the time difference to an integer number of frames. The initial frame_time can be somewhat arbitrary, as it depends on the first cycle which is not driven by the frame clock. But follow-up cycles are typically tied to the the compositor sending the drawn signal. It may happen that the initial frame is exactly in the middle between two frames where jitter causes us to randomly round in different directions when rounding to nearest frame. To fix this we additionally do a quadratic convergence towards the "real" time, during presentation driven clock cycles (i.e. when the frame times are small).
2020-05-18 13:48:03 +00:00
timings->smoothed_frame_time = priv->smoothed_frame_time_base;
timings->slept_before = priv->sleep_serial != get_sleep_serial ();
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT;
/* We always emit ::before-paint and ::after-paint if
* any of the intermediate phases are requested and
* they don't get repeated if you freeze/thaw while
* in them.
*/
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_BEFORE_PAINT;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_before_paint (clock);
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_UPDATE;
}
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_UPDATE:
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
if ((priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_UPDATE) != 0 ||
priv->updating_count > 0)
{
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_UPDATE;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_update (clock);
}
}
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT:
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
int iter;
#ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG
if (GDK_DEBUG_CHECK (FRAMES))
{
if (priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT &&
(priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT))
timings->layout_start_time = g_get_monotonic_time ();
}
#endif
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT;
/* We loop in the layout phase, because we don't want to progress
* into the paint phase with invalid size allocations. This may
* happen in some situation like races between user window
* resizes and natural size changes.
*/
iter = 0;
while ((priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT) &&
priv->freeze_count == 0 && iter++ < 4)
{
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_LAYOUT;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_layout (clock);
}
if (iter == 5)
g_warning ("gdk-frame-clock: layout continuously requested, giving up after 4 tries");
}
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT:
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
#ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG
if (GDK_DEBUG_CHECK (FRAMES))
{
if (priv->phase != GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT &&
(priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT))
timings->paint_start_time = g_get_monotonic_time ();
}
#endif
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT;
if (priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT)
{
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_PAINT;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_paint (clock);
}
}
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_AFTER_PAINT:
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_AFTER_PAINT;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_after_paint (clock);
/* the ::after-paint phase doesn't get repeated on freeze/thaw,
*/
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE;
}
#ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG
if (GDK_DEBUG_CHECK (FRAMES))
timings->frame_end_time = g_get_monotonic_time ();
#endif /* G_ENABLE_DEBUG */
G_GNUC_FALLTHROUGH;
case GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_RESUME_EVENTS:
default:
;
}
}
if (priv->requested & GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_RESUME_EVENTS)
{
priv->requested &= ~GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_RESUME_EVENTS;
_gdk_frame_clock_emit_resume_events (clock);
}
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE;
priv->in_paint_idle = FALSE;
/* If there is throttling in the backend layer, then we'll do another
* update as soon as the backend unthrottles (if there is work to do),
* otherwise we need to figure when the next frame should be.
*/
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
/*
* If we don't receive "frame drawn" events, smooth_cycle_start will simply be advanced in constant increments of
* the refresh interval. That way we get absolute target times for the next cycles, which should prevent skewing
* in the scheduling of the frame clock.
*
* Once we do receive "frame drawn" events, smooth_cycle_start will track the vsync, and do so in a more stable
* way compared to frame_time. If we then no longer receive "frame drawn" events, smooth_cycle_start will again be
* simply advanced in increments of the refresh interval, but this time we are in sync with the vsync. If we start
* receiving "frame drawn" events shortly after losing them, then we should still be in sync.
*/
gint64 smooth_cycle_start = priv->smoothed_frame_time_base - priv->smoothed_frame_time_phase;
priv->min_next_frame_time = smooth_cycle_start + priv->smoothed_frame_time_period;
maybe_start_idle (clock_idle, FALSE);
}
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
priv->sleep_serial = get_sleep_serial ();
gdk_profiler_end_mark (before, "frameclock cycle", NULL);
return FALSE;
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_request_phase (GdkFrameClock *clock,
GdkFrameClockPhase phase)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
priv->requested |= phase;
maybe_start_idle (clock_idle, FALSE);
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_begin_updating (GdkFrameClock *clock)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
#ifdef G_OS_WIN32
/* We need a higher resolution timer while doing animations */
if (priv->updating_count == 0 && !priv->begin_period)
{
timeBeginPeriod(1);
priv->begin_period = TRUE;
}
#endif
if (priv->updating_count == 0)
{
priv->smooth_phase_state = SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_AWAIT_FIRST;
}
priv->updating_count++;
maybe_start_idle (clock_idle, FALSE);
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_end_updating (GdkFrameClock *clock)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
g_return_if_fail (priv->updating_count > 0);
priv->updating_count--;
maybe_stop_idle (clock_idle);
if (priv->updating_count == 0)
{
priv->smooth_phase_state = SMOOTH_PHASE_STATE_VALID;
}
#ifdef G_OS_WIN32
if (priv->updating_count == 0 && priv->begin_period)
{
timeEndPeriod(1);
priv->begin_period = FALSE;
}
#endif
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_freeze (GdkFrameClock *clock)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
2019-05-16 20:50:31 +00:00
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
if (GDK_PROFILER_IS_RUNNING)
2019-05-16 20:50:31 +00:00
priv->freeze_time = g_get_monotonic_time ();
}
priv->freeze_count++;
maybe_stop_idle (clock_idle);
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_thaw (GdkFrameClock *clock)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock_idle = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE (clock);
GdkFrameClockIdlePrivate *priv = clock_idle->priv;
g_return_if_fail (priv->freeze_count > 0);
priv->freeze_count--;
if (priv->freeze_count == 0)
{
maybe_start_idle (clock_idle, TRUE);
/* If nothing is requested so we didn't start an idle, we need
* to skip to the end of the state chain, since the idle won't
* run and do it for us.
*/
if (priv->paint_idle_id == 0)
priv->phase = GDK_FRAME_CLOCK_PHASE_NONE;
priv->sleep_serial = get_sleep_serial ();
2019-05-16 20:50:31 +00:00
if (GDK_PROFILER_IS_RUNNING)
2019-05-16 20:50:31 +00:00
{
if (priv->freeze_time != 0)
{
gdk_profiler_end_mark (priv->freeze_time * 1000, "frameclock frozen", NULL);
2019-05-16 20:50:31 +00:00
priv->freeze_time = 0;
}
}
}
}
static void
gdk_frame_clock_idle_class_init (GdkFrameClockIdleClass *klass)
{
GObjectClass *gobject_class = (GObjectClass*) klass;
GdkFrameClockClass *frame_clock_class = (GdkFrameClockClass *)klass;
gobject_class->dispose = gdk_frame_clock_idle_dispose;
frame_clock_class->get_frame_time = gdk_frame_clock_idle_get_frame_time;
frame_clock_class->request_phase = gdk_frame_clock_idle_request_phase;
frame_clock_class->begin_updating = gdk_frame_clock_idle_begin_updating;
frame_clock_class->end_updating = gdk_frame_clock_idle_end_updating;
frame_clock_class->freeze = gdk_frame_clock_idle_freeze;
frame_clock_class->thaw = gdk_frame_clock_idle_thaw;
}
GdkFrameClock *
_gdk_frame_clock_idle_new (void)
{
GdkFrameClockIdle *clock;
clock = g_object_new (GDK_TYPE_FRAME_CLOCK_IDLE, NULL);
return GDK_FRAME_CLOCK (clock);
}