Added some UI items, and an explanatory comment at the top of the file.

Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000  Owen Taylor  <otaylor@redhat.com>

	* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
	comment at the top of the file.
This commit is contained in:
Owen Taylor 2000-02-25 16:17:10 +00:00 committed by Owen Taylor
parent b128983b58
commit 713b36cedb
8 changed files with 96 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Fri Feb 25 11:12:00 2000 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com>
* TODO.xml: Added some UI items, and an explanatory
comment at the top of the file.
Thu Feb 24 09:07:28 2000 Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org>
* TODO.xml: some updates, added abunch of new entries.

View File

@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
<!-- This is used to generate the online TODO list for GTK+ using
the script docs/make-todo. Whenever a change to this file is
committed to CVS,the file is run through make-todo and the online
version updated. If you modify this file, you should check for
parse errors by running:
$ docs/make-todo > /dev/null
before committing, or you may screw up the online version -->
<todo>
<section>
<title>GDK</title>
@ -285,6 +293,58 @@
<contact>gtk-devel-list@redhat.com</contact>
</entry>
<entry size="small" status="0%" target="1.4">
<title>Improve Radio/Checkbutton Look</title>
<description>
<p>
The default look for the radio and checkbuttons is both
unattractive and not friendly to the user . Motif did not
get this one right, and we should not keep on following the
Motif look. The right thing here is probably to copy the
Windows appearance for these controls fairly closely. This
will fit in with well with the rest of the GTK+ look.
</p>
</description>
<contact>gtk-devel-list@redhat.com</contact>
</entry>
<entry size="small" status="0%" target="1.4">
<title>Improve Submenu Navigation</title>
<description>
<p>
Navigating through a deep menu tree in GTK+ is currently
quite tricky, because as soon as one leaves a menu item,
the submenu disappears. The way that the Macintosh is
reputed to handle this is that to pop down the current
submenu, you have to leave the triangle defined by the
upper left hand corner of the menu item and right
side of the submenu.
</p>
</description>
<contact>gtk-devel-list@redhat.com</contact>
</entry>
<entry size="small" status="0%" target="1.4 ?">
<title>Improve Spinbutton Look</title>
<description>
<p>
Spinbuttons currently appear to have lumpy boundaries,
because sides of the arrows aren't at an angle that
meshes well with the pixel grid. However, fixing this
would require making the spinbuttons narrower and
harder to hit. This points out a general problem with
the spinbutton (and the arrows on the scrollbars) - the
target area for clicks actually the bounding box of the
arrows, but the user thinks that they must click on the
arrows themselves. It would probably be more friendly
to use a square button with an arrow drawn on top instead
of a arrow-shaped button, the approach taken by most other
windowing systems.
</p>
</description>
<contact>gtk-devel-list@redhat.com</contact>
</entry>
<entry size="big" status="90%" target="1.4">
<title>Supply horizontable/vertical wrapping boxes</title>
<description>